Type4_PTS
Diamond Invictus SP
And what many critics don't realize is LRH Jr is not a highly reliable source
He's LRH's son. Why is he not a highly reliable source?
And what many critics don't realize is LRH Jr is not a highly reliable source
For what reason do you believe he's not a highly reliable source?And what many critics don't realize is LRH Jr is not a highly reliable source
In your above post you said...YEAH!!!
Damn Fukkin' Right other people do some pretty hotshit spiritual things!
I like hanging out with them in the Haight.
And...
I was never into calling people wogs nor did I swing with the "Homo Novis" concept
But...
(sharpen the points on your darts Pitsy; here comes another Birdsong's Best (TM) Dartboard)
One of the reasons so many people have done so many intense spiritual things is because, as I said in my book; "L Ron Hubbard is arguably the most influential philosopher of the Twentieth Century"
Because he was too close
You must be at least ten feet away from a Strativarius to hear the true richness of it's sound
From Earth the planet Venus is eye candy of the first degree; it's a rather different sight when viewed from the surface
By this logic you would also be an unreliable source of info with regards to Hubbard.Because he was too close
You must be at least ten feet away from a Strativarius to hear the true richness of it's sound
From Earth the planet Venus is eye candy of the first degree; it's a rather different sight when viewed from the surface
Well hell, from now on every time you talk about time spent by children in a chain locker not having any lasting effect on them, I'm going to ask you WHY you know that to be true.Questions which start with "why" aren't going to get definitive answers
Why?
HOW THE FUCK SHOULD I KNOW WHY?
I did say "one of the reasons" not "the reason"In your above post you said...
"One of the reasons so many people have done so many intense spiritual things is because, as I said in my book; "L Ron Hubbard is arguably the most influential philosopher of the Twentieth Century"
LRH is the reason so many people have done so many intense spiritual things? Are you kidding me?
Because there's no testimony to the contrary and children are well known to be very resilient and the chain locker is only conclusively child abuse because the presence of the capstan makes it "Reckless Endangerment" and it is otherwise borderline child abuseWell hell, from now on every time you talk about time spent by children in a chain locker not having any lasting effect on them, I'm going to ask you WHY you know that to be true.
I don't think you've been reading my posts PitsyBy this logic you would also be an unreliable source of info with regards to Hubbard.
You also are in violation of that 10 foot rule, given your nose is shoved far up into a part of his anatomy where the sun don't shine.
What a complete load of old bollocks! (Shakespeare - Twelfth Night)I did say "one of the reasons" not "the reason"
Before there was Hugh Hefner, Jack Kerouac, Lenny Bruce, Ken Kesey, Tim Leary, et al
There was The Beast himself L Ron Hubbard pulling the plow that turned the earth that all the wild Sixties grew their seeds in
Invalidate it up one side and down the other it is HUBBARD that is the single premier figure in spawning the philosophical fireworks of the second half of the Twentieth Century.
Which is not to say his effect on the course of human history is all that significant when compared to Louis "Satchmo" Armstrong mind you...
OK, so you claim that LRH confessed and repented in his "Admissions" (written in the 1940s).I am a Christian and lawfully ordained member of clergy. I find confession and repentance of the transgression in "The Admissions".
Good enough for me. Private confession is entirely adequate. There can scarcely be any requirement for public confession to a vicious angry mob intent on destroying both the confessor and his work
But you are certainly true to your role as Devil's Advocate Pitsy
Rock on bro' !
I don't get to choose between those two and the reason is I have never lived another person's life.Because there's no testimony to the contrary and children are well known to be very resilient and the chain locker is only conclusively child abuse because the presence of the capstan makes it "Reckless Endangerment" and it is otherwise borderline child abuse
From the age of five to the age of eleven Charles Bukowski had a father who three times a week took him into the family bathroom made him drop trou and bend over and then delivered eight, ten maybe fourteen damn hard stinging whacks with heavy leather belt
You get to choose between two childhoods George; one where the worst that happens is you spend two days in the chain locker, one where you get your hindquarters smacked hard three times a week for six years
Which one you gonna take?
You think Hugh Hefner, Lenny Bruce and Tim Leary have to do with reasons why people did intense spiritual things?I did say "one of the reasons" not "the reason"
Before there was Hugh Hefner, Jack Kerouac, Lenny Bruce, Ken Kesey, Tim Leary, et al
There was The Beast himself L Ron Hubbard pulling the plow that turned the earth that all the wild Sixties grew their seeds in
Invalidate it up one side and down the other it is HUBBARD that is the single premier figure in spawning the philosophical fireworks of the second half of the Twentieth Century.
Which is not to say his effect on the course of human history is all that significant when compared to Louis "Satchmo" Armstrong mind you...
I did say "one of the reasons" not "the reason"
Before there was Hugh Hefner, Jack Kerouac, Lenny Bruce, Ken Kesey, Tim Leary, et al
There was The Beast himself L Ron Hubbard pulling the plow that turned the earth that all the wild Sixties grew their seeds in
Invalidate it up one side and down the other it is HUBBARD that is the single premier figure in spawning the philosophical fireworks of the second half of the Twentieth Century.
Which is not to say his effect on the course of human history is all that significant when compared to Louis "Satchmo" Armstrong mind you...
Try the latter one.....he's had more experience with LRH tech than the first one.I don't think you've been reading my posts Pitsy
I'm not his servant much less his sycophant. I have stated several times He may perhaps have been truly an evil man and that I feared him as much as respected him
I do know from examining his work WITH SCIENTIFIC RIGOR that he developed techniques which can in fact permanently eliminate somatics and EII; though not with the ballyhooed 100% promised but in some people some of the time and by far enough people often enough to be of very great interest and value
And I'm not a source of info about him anyway, I'm someone who examines information; a very difficult task...
Take Gordon Bell for instance...
Ran into Scientology in Texas in 1957 and hustlebutt off to FCDC to work with Hubbard then followed him to Saint Hill
He got me to join staff at FCDC in 1972 and I knew him for years when he was the most ardent of Hubbardites.
Then on this board he was surely among the most virulent of those who denounced Ron and his work
Which Gordon should i consider reliable Pitsy?
I said "arguably the most influential philosopher"You think Hugh Hefner, Lenny Bruce and Tim Leary have to do with reasons why people did intense spiritual things?
Am I reading you right when you seem to say that Louis Armstrong had a more significant effect on the course of human history than LRH (the most important philosopher in the Twentieth Century, according to you)?