This post is not meant to offend those who use the tech and get benefits from it. It is my viewpoint, take it or leave it.
When I was in Scientology, way back when, one of the things that jarred the “shiny happy people” facade was that thing of “no case on post!”. I cannot tell you how many people (ex-Scientologists) have said that was a totally wrong indication for them.
Indeed. If you can “make it go right” to have “no case on post”, then why the f#@k do you need Scientology?
Conversely, the Org staff environment is such an insane one, it *creates* case.
Here’s the kicker. Why on EARTH (teegeack), if you have in your hands the spiritual technology that will solve all mankind’s problems, not USE it on your own staff? Surely, by handling their case every now and then, when needed, you would have totally superpowered staff? I mean, if you drive a car, you don’t expect it to keep going – you maintain and service it, keep it in good condition, if you expect it to perform well.
I concluded that that proved that Scientology is a Con. If they did actually use Hubbard’s tech on their staff, it would show that it doesn’t work. Hence: “no case on post”, and if anything goes wrong, the burden of responsibility is on the staff member who obviously let “case on post happen.”
Neat.
- jodie