What's new

#3 Person Crippling Scientology - Marty Rathbun

guanoloco

As-Wased
I'm curious who #2 will be, I think DM will claim the #1 spot.:yes:

I'm thinking all 4'6" of him will be #2...

...and for the #1 spot?

Well...those teeth...those dubious deeds...those marvelous claims...travels to Venus and the Van Allen belt - did I mention Heaven? How about Heaven twice?

The good old doctor of philosophy, that nuclear physicist, L. Ron Hubbard, PHD., aka Mystic's Tulpa.

Once one finds out the actual factual about Hu666ard things get repulsive fast - kinda negative ARC, that.
 
Last edited:

Smilla

Ordinary Human
Helluva, after 25 years, and all Marty got was a shack, while his compadre got the whole cake...I think that one day he woke up and realized his mistake...LOL! After all that time!

What do I believe in? I believe in what I see that it works, be the Tech, Buddhism, plain old logic from my greatgrandmother...you name...I am ecclectic...LOL.

I thank you for the admiration flow and I assure you that it is corresponded, I admire you and most here as well...

Always glad to have you posting here. Congratulations on your eclectic approach!
 

Smilla

Ordinary Human
I was talking about the real truth....not Rathbun's truth.
Once people start really talking it is amazing what can happen. :coolwink:

The truth for a Scientologist is either:

A. What they are told from above.

or if they are above:

B. Whatever is convenient.


 

HelluvaHoax!

Platinum Meritorious Sponsor with bells on
The truth for a Scientologist is either:

A. What they are told from above.

or if they are above:

B. Whatever is convenient.




Okay, I've had quite enough of your nonsense!

You--You--You are Double-Declared!

(ps: love your post even though your eternity is now messed up)
 
And, in truth, I don't at all CARE, not in the slightest, "who is who in ScnWorld".

That is about as important to me as what happened on some "soap opera" yesterday afternoon. Realize that the last time I saw or heard ANY soap opera was in the late sixties when my mom used to watch them while ironing clothes!

Can anyone say "insignificant"?

Yes, G. And that is a sensible attitude to have. But then again, unlike others on the board you aren't prone to ventures in adversarial factionalism. :)


Mark A. Baker
 

HelluvaHoax!

Platinum Meritorious Sponsor with bells on
Yes, G. And that is a sensible attitude to have. But then again, unlike others on the board you aren't prone to ventures in adversarial factionalism. :)Mark A. Baker


Doesn't Ron's Guru Guide suggest that you include a free complimentary glossary when you are making up ridiculously ambiguous, faux-scholarly sounding pseudo-scientific shit?

Your HWCS certificate has been renewed for another year at no charge.


Hubbard Word-Clown Specialist
 

Gadfly

Crusader
Yes, G. And that is a sensible attitude to have. But then again, unlike others on the board you aren't prone to ventures in adversarial factionalism. :)

Mark A. Baker

Doesn't Ron's Guru Guide suggest that you include a free complimentary glossary when you are making up ridiculously ambiguous, faux-scholarly sounding pseudo-scientific shit?

Your HWCS certificate has been renewed for another year at no charge.


Hubbard Word-Clown Specialist

I got what Mark meant, and his comment does relate to certain observable events and dramatic "outbursts" on this board. :confused2:

But, I am sure that might be unpopular to say out loud. :nervous: :unsure:
 

Auditor's Toad

Clear as Mud
I got what Mark meant, and his comment does relate to certain observable events and dramatic "outbursts" on this board. :confused2:

But, I am sure that might be unpopular to say out loud. :nervous: :unsure:

Why yes.....any and all emotions displayed violate a boatload of Hubbard's Policies, so, I can see where some call for, and expect compliance with, all posters being little emotionless robots.

This shit gets really funny ! Good catch !

.......

And no wonder that I am wondering why the fuck I keep posting here - sometimes this joint is more scientological than a fucking org.

In any event, be kind to one another.
 

Gadfly

Crusader
Why yes.....any and all emotions displayed violate a boatload of Hubbard's Policies, so, I can see where some call for, and expect compliance with, all posters being little emotionless robots.

This shit gets really funny ! Good catch !

.......

And no wonder that I am wondering why the fuck I keep posting here - sometimes this joint is more scientological than a fucking org.

In any event, be kind to one another.

Wasn't talking about "emotions".

Anyway, Toady, what is THAT on your new avatar's nose??????? :confused2: :omg: :omg:

Sort of reminds me of Dan Akroyd's character from the movie, Nothing But Trouble:

[video=youtube;6IMdPYEaod0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IMdPYEaod0[/video]

Watch the clip to the very end, where the nose CHANGES into "something" else (at about the 30 second mark). It was never "subliminal" to me, and I noticed it the first time I saw the movie. My son did too (he was about 12 years old at the time).

Compare with:

image.php


I liked the one-eyed toad MUCH better!!!!!!
 
Last edited:

guanoloco

As-Wased
Why yes.....any and all emotions displayed violate a boatload of Hubbard's Policies, so, I can see where some call for, and expect compliance with, all posters being little emotionless robots.

This shit gets really funny ! Good catch !

.......

And no wonder that I am wondering why the fuck I keep posting here - sometimes this joint is more scientological than a fucking org.

In any event, be kind to one another.

Well, Toady, I am ARC-broken to no end...so badly that I almost flew into an emotional venture of adversarial factionalism...

Why?

Because I dearly loved the cycloptic toad avatar and not the Harry Potter thingamabob.
 
Why yes.....any and all emotions displayed violate a boatload of Hubbard's Policies, ...

For someone who has supposedly 'left it all behind', you really do give the impression of being more than a bit fixated on what hubbard had to say.

You might want to take a closer look at that as well as a few of your other assumptions. :whistling:


Mark A. Baker
 
For someone who has supposedly 'left it all behind', you really do give the impression of being more than a bit fixated on what hubbard had to say.

You might want to take a closer look at that as well as a few of your other assumptions. :whistling:


Mark A. Baker

You might want to take a look at why you need to write posts like that Mark. (Whistling)
 
Top