You went to the smear sites ... of course. And you found lots of stuff that agrees with your beliefs. Of course. But you didn't go to the "evil denier sites" I provided links to. You want to "discuss evidence" without reading any sites that might have, you know, evidence. You expect me, or anyone, to explain things in a few simple sentences where experts have written extensive papers refuting the alarmist creed. If you really want facts, you might start here: Four Reasons Alarmists Are Wrong on Climate Change And here is a nice list of articles refuting some alarmist claims one by one: Category Archives: Climate Change And, of course, those "evil denier sites" I mentioned before. Then we'd have something to discuss. EDIT: And, if you detect I'm a little annoyed, it's because I hate hypocrisy. You say "I am always interested in facts" and say you want to "discuss evidence" but categorically refuse to even look at skeptic sites.