I instantly thought of the McDonalds sign. "Over 1 billion served". A good number when calculating over the past 64 years the number of times Scientologists and their enemies have been served law suits and subpoenas. So I started to do a shoop of it...
I got as far as changing the McDonalds sign to "McRonalds" and then was suddenly interrupted by an urgent cycle so I didn't complete it. (I had to go into a different room because I thought there might be something good on TV) lolololol.
Zero Clears and growingsemantics.
over 1 billion served vs
how many satisfied?
Every single time? One was served?
somebody once said, you can't please everybody all the time.
Zero Clears and growing
actually,
the amount of "clears" is growing,
as they are clearing out of scientology, as evident by the numbers of people speaking out now.
Scientology has an extremely high success rate at creating ex-Scientologistsactually,
the amount of "clears" is growing,
as they are clearing out of scientology, as evident by the numbers of people speaking out now.
Scientology has an extremely high success rate at creating is ex-Scientologists
The greatest good for the 9th $cientology dynamics!
J. Gordon Milton was on the $$$$$$payroll$$$$$$ of OSA INT to give religiosity credibility to the Church.
Religious scholars and experts were routinely hired for $$$$ in case they were needed to testify
*eccelsiastically* on the *religion* of Scientology.
Heck, for $25,000 many Scholars are willing to write a good thesis on how Religious a Religion is.
Hired professionals are always a part of Office of Special Affairs budget.
There is an interesting essay on James R. Lewis, another scholar who reversed his opinion of Scientology meeting with J. Gordon Melton here ~~
http://leavingscientology.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/an-open-letter-from-james-r-lewis/
I've read Dead Agent packs that consisted of outrageous nonsense asserted by Melton as an "expert witness" for Scientology Inc.
Please don't derail this thread with your dopey admiration for someone who has contributed to hurting good people.
Okay, guys, here is Part 2 in my series on What is Wrong with Scientology, i.e. how it is ensuring it's own destruction. Comments and feedback welcome. I know sound is not awesome and that is my next learning curve and I swear I'll have it fixed by my next video (or at least bumped up in quality).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOH0ur9zvUc
It's my plan to have these coming out every 7 days until done. There should be about 4-5 parts to this series as currently planned.
Okay, guys, here is Part 2 in my series on What is Wrong with Scientology, i.e. how it is ensuring it's own destruction. Comments and feedback welcome. I know sound is not awesome and that is my next learning curve and I swear I'll have it fixed by my next video (or at least bumped up in quality).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOH0ur9zvUc
It's my plan to have these coming out every 7 days until done. There should be about 4-5 parts to this series as currently planned.
Hey guys, here is Part 3, just published today. I am particularly happy with this one. As I was researching the quotes and putting it together, it really hit me just how purposeful the whole Suppresive Person doctrine was and how craftily he worded the policies to mind bend Scientologists around the idea of enemies to the church who deserve whatever harsh treatment anyone wants to dish out to them. The whole thing was definitely no accident.
[video=youtube;3nApJb5gEy8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nApJb5gEy8[/video]
Hey guys, here is Part 3, just published today. I am particularly happy with this one. As I was researching the quotes and putting it together, it really hit me just how purposeful the whole Suppresive Person doctrine was and how craftily he worded the policies to mind bend Scientologists around the idea of enemies to the church who deserve whatever harsh treatment anyone wants to dish out to them. The whole thing was definitely no accident.
[video=youtube;3nApJb5gEy8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nApJb5gEy8[/video]