Please don't speculate about Mosey, or involve her in your discussion of Marty. Please respect her right to privacy.
Are any mentions of Monique forbidden?
What are the guidelines?
After all, the lawsuit was legally hers.
Please don't speculate about Mosey, or involve her in your discussion of Marty. Please respect her right to privacy.
Folks, to avoid MU's...... ahhh..... confusion: AASC means "ADVANCED-Anti-Scientology-Cult" which has nothing to do with the AASR, standing for "Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry", which can be seen as a cult too.Good gawd, write like a normal person. ASC & AASC? That's fucking Martyology. Just be normal.Which cult? Scientology? ASC? Or AASC (Anti-Anti-Scientology-Cult)
Folks, to avoid MU's...... ahhh..... confusion: AASC means "ADVANCED-Anti-Scientology-Cult" which has nothing to do with the AASR, standing for "Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry", which can be seen as a cult too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Rite
Marty has gone off the deep end with this attack on Chris Shelton.
https://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2016/09/19/how-gullible-can-one-get/
There are some words in there which involve libel, especially the line, "In either event, it demonstrates that Shelton at best is not playing with a full deck." Methinks Marty views himself too much as knowledgeable in legal matters, and forgets that he no longer has the cover of the church.
Or does he?
That is interesting. To my knowledge, Chris Shelton has never commented on Marty Rathbun. I suspect he probably won't. He is a little to classy for that.
Chris Shelton is a very gentle skeptic, and one for whom I have a great deal of respect. He is quite popular on youtube (and growing) and I suspect he has quite an impact on Scientologists and ex Scientologists.
That he is an enemy of the COfS and has not said anything about Marty Rathbun does not speak well for Marty's motives.
I think his last video was all about Marty.
I didn't watch it though, I guess I will now
Thanks for the reminder Marty! LOL
That is interesting. To my knowledge, Chris Shelton has never commented on Marty Rathbun. I suspect he probably won't. He is a little to classy for that.
Chris Shelton is a very gentle skeptic, and one for whom I have a great deal of respect. He is quite popular on youtube (and growing) and I suspect he has quite an impact on Scientologists and ex Scientologists.
That he is an enemy of the COfS and has not said anything about Marty Rathbun does not speak well for Marty's motives.
It came to my attention that some fellow gave a youtube lecture about what he called a conflict between Tony Ortega and me. When I went to the video I saw a man calling himself Chris Shelton ‘critical thinker at large.’ It would be difficult to imagine more inflated airs of self-absorbed arrogance than this fellow manages to put on; nor a mind as infected with hive-mentality.
Mr. Shelton claims in the video not to know anything about what went down behind the scenes in the terminations of Monique Rathbun’s lawyers and lawsuit – delivered with a tongue-in-cheek smirk. But, he comes to the authoritative conclusion that I have somehow overreacted to Ortega’s four-month campaign smearing my wife and me over the issue. He concludes it is a function of the damaged former Scientologist mind – a syndrome he claims to be an expert in.
This is the opening two paragraphs, which I felt, made it so that I didn't need to read further. He offers his summary in the first paragraph.
I was amused by this: "inflated airs of self-absorbed arrogance than this fellow manages to put on; nor a mind as infected with hive-mentality." Because do you know how rude Chris was in the video? He said: "a tongue-in-cheek smirk."
The style that he wrote it in, is very hostile and provoking. It makes me feel like he's trying to instill an opinion in the reader. I don't know how to say it other than he's coming off like he's an Opinion Leader. He has his little camp, and he's making it clear how they feel ;-) Of course I mean how Marty feels.
That is interesting. To my knowledge, Chris Shelton has never commented on Marty Rathbun. I suspect he probably won't. He is a little to classy for that.
Chris Shelton is a very gentle skeptic, and one for whom I have a great deal of respect. He is quite popular on youtube (and growing) and I suspect he has quite an impact on Scientologists and ex Scientologists.
That he is an enemy of the COfS and has not said anything about Marty Rathbun does not speak well for Marty's motives.
I wonder what odds the bookmakers had on Chris Shelton being Marty's next object of attack. I had money on Mike Rinder (I'm sure it's coming).
Please Marty, let Chris be and say something about medical matters. The Purif would be a good place to start. I'll give you a profanity laced logic-spanking that will really be worth reacting to, just for the comedy value of seeing you dig a hole like a demented beagle on a beach.
Sounds like a plan Ems. I wish you luck with it - the problem with arguing with demented loons like VM and the Oracle - even by proxy - is that you run the risk of sounding like them.
As for Marty - well he came to FB and started at rock bottom and has continued to tunnel downwards ever since. As he has nothing to offer to the whole Scientology debate I am surprised he has not gone off to make himself a career in management at McDonalds. He could have been French Fry I/C by now.
Hope you are doing well Ems, have not heard from you in a long while - I get more messages from Kev and he is about as communicative as any wombat in the outback...