This complaint comes up from time to time here on ESMB and I don't agree with it.
Yes, it is true that any posting that could remotely be considered positive about Hubbard or Scientology is often attacked by a few people. But that is not representative of the general tone of ESMB responses. Why paint ESMB with the broad brush based on a few responses?
Disagreeing with a positive statement about Scientology or responding with negative information does not constitute "intolerance". Disagreement and discussion is what forums such as ESMB are for.
In general, people who recount some positive experiences in Scientology are met with tolerance but often with, as was said before, clear warnings that Scientology is not all "good experiences" but is, in fact, quite harmful. That also is not intolerance but merely good intentions for the safety of others.
And last, if you, or anyone, wants to write about how wonderful Scientology or Hubbard is, it would be best not to declare this testimonial in front of those who have, some of them, been quite damaged by Scientology. It won't be well received. That also is not intolerance. It would be your bad choice of forum for that message.
Bill
I tend to enjoy a lot of your posts criticizing Scn theories, etc. But I will say this re some others:
In the past I've been slammed and excoriated by a few here and on OCMB for being perceived as not having the right stance on this Scio stuff. On OCMB when I attempted to be relatively pacific, stating that I'd not post wins or testimonials cuz it's not appropriate on a critical forum, I got slammed FOR THAT. And here, I had a cpl ppl - one currently suspended and a cpl no longer with us accusing me of so many odd odd things.
So this lead me to one inescapable conclusion:
There are different motives and positions amongst antitekkies, not just one.
There are critical exes like you or TAJ or even some never been in ones are like that, who want to do exactly what they say they want- to say how they feel and what they observed. Straightforward, honest, fair albeit blunt, occasionally harsh but decent ppl who just want to discuss it.
There are also people who are looking for someone at whom to vent their spleen, and who are looking to blame someone for their pain, even if they have to lie and misrepresent. These sorts have no truck with freedom of viewpoint or speech and behave much like an RTC staffer on a rampage with a junior or at a lower Org while on a mission.
You actually mean what you say and aren't looking to get a scapegoat. Can't say the same for les autres.