Jim Logan
Veda, you should be reading what Vinay has read. To wit, the Veda. Alan's sign off is accurate as well, what is? For some the realization that LRH was in fact in the time stream, subject to the very principles he was working at delineating, or that he 'touched his own pee-pee' is disconcerting and throws them into a tailspin where they then discount or discredit an entire subject. What do they do about Einstein's out-2D, or Newton's alchemy and Masonry? Does that mean balls don't drop or mass can't be converted to energy? Jeepers creepers.I am with Jim in this discussion.
I find some critics are unable to separate Scientology form its misapplication, and just want to condemn all of it.
LRH himself was not above misapplying Scientology.
.
Here's one to mull over. For the basis of argument, assume that the axioms of as-isness, alter-is and so on are the premise. In order to gain persistence, or maybe say 'smash one's name into history', then one would seriously alter-is and foster not-is, of the identity of L. Ron Hubbard. So, lie, lie, lie, about that identity. What do you get? It's persisting so hard for some that they can't shake it. Then look at the phenomena of electromagnetics and how you gain a difference of potential and extrapolate those ideas up into 'what you resist you become' and there may be a diabolical subterfuge on LRH's part to actually foster hatred of him so you would become him....holy cow! LRH created this message board!!
For anyone intelligently considering these subjects and willing to go through what it really takes then there are joys aplenty. Personally, I'm having an outrageous blast. I'd love to see lots of you guys in the same, 'different responses' type freedom. However you get there, it's sooo much fun. Jim