F.Bullbait
Oh, a wise guy,eh?
Prove it, prove it, prove it ... nag, nag nag...
The bottom line is that there are some things that cannot be proven. In the same way, they cannot be disproven either. The existence of God, is one example. Given that God is, by definition, beyond, outside of, above, the physical universe, you can't use physical universe tools to "see" God. Assuming that definition, the existence of "God" cannot be proved or disproved.It isn't just "communicating about something". What you do is a bit different. I paraphrase:
Mimsey: A is true.
Someone: I don't think A is true.Mimsey: A is true, here is a link, here is an anecdote, here is another link, A is true!Someone: Um... none of that proves that A is true.Mimsey: NO! A is true! Here are three more links, here I repeat my anecdote. A is true!Someone: Mimsey, all that still isn't proof.Mimsey: A is true. Why don't you listen to me! A is true. Why don't you read what I wrote!
It is perfectly fine that you believe what you believe ... and it is perfectly fine that others don't believe as you do. Accept that and move on.
The bottom line is that there are some things that cannot be proven. In the same way, they cannot be disproven either. The existence of God, is one example. Given that God is, by definition, beyond, outside of, above, the physical universe, you can't use physical universe tools to "see" God. Assuming that definition, the existence of "God" cannot be proved or disproved.
So why argue about it?
The same goes for all that "paranormal" stuff. Why argue about it?
Have you ever listened to his videos?Outside of the Scientology bubble - outside of Scientology orgs, promo and literature - can anyone locate an account by Ingo Swann where he credits Scientology for the return of his natural paranormal abilities?
Swann studied many subjects having to do with the paranormal, etc., and he discusses them, except Scientology, or so it seems.
I've definitely not examined all of his writings, or listened to all of his available recorded lectures, where he - possibly - was questioned, maybe, about Scientology? But I've never come across it.
Doesn't it seem odd that there's one version of Ingo Swann when he was in Scientology and amongst Scientologists, and another version of Ingo Swann when he's outside Scientology, a version where he never mentions Scientology?
Are any of you Scientology sympathizers at least a wee bit curious about that?
Have you ever listened to his videos?
Have you ever listened to his videos?
Don't know why there would be a need to be a connection. Could be he study Scientology to see if it could expand upon what ever he was doing already. His remote viewing didn't necessarily come from doing Scientology. Scientology may just be an experiment of his to see if there was anything it could add.
Yes, some of them, not this one until just now.
Ingo is in good form.
Didn't notice any mention of Scientology (did I miss it?) but I did notice he used the words, "Matter, Energy, Space, and Time," and "Mental Image Picture."
CLAIMS, claims.. and all such BS. Thanks Veda, do you know what year that is from?
1973.CLAIMS, claims.. and all such BS. Thanks Veda, do you know what year that is from?
Clear 2170 Veda, someone dear to your heart I believe. And almost next to her name, Robin's. Now isn't it amazing that after carrying this R6 bank around for all these millions of years that they should both 'go clear' on practically the same day!1973.
Below is from a couple of years earlier than that.
The assembly line was cookin.
(The graph of numbers of Clears began to almost flat line around 1976. It didn't take long for Hubbard to "discover Dianetic Clear.")
Where are they now?
Clear 2170 Veda, someone dear to your heart I believe. And almost next to her name, Robin's. Now isn't it amazing that after carrying this R6 bank around for all these millions of years that they should both 'go clear' on practically the same day!
Clear 2226 Henning Heldt! Wasn't he involved in the Snow White program?1973.
Below is from a couple of years earlier than that.
The assembly line was cookin.
(The graph of numbers of Clears began to almost flat line around 1976. It didn't take long for Hubbard to "discover Dianetic Clear.")
Where are they now?
I know 13 of them and a couple I have heard of but not met - I can't recall my clear # anymore, but I went clear around that time - it was in 1970. Mimsey1973.
Below is from a couple of years earlier than that.
The assembly line was cookin.
(The graph of numbers of Clears began to almost flat line around 1976. It didn't take long for Hubbard to "discover Dianetic Clear.")
Where are they now?
Beginning or end of 1970?I know 13 of them and a couple I have heard of but not met - I can't recall my clear # anymore, but I went clear around that time - it was in 1970. Mimsey
I met her at NYO HGC waiting for her power. I also knew Robin and Janet - I never met Mike. I met them again in LA a year or so later. They are great people.Clear 2170 Veda, someone dear to your heart I believe. And almost next to her name, Robin's. Now isn't it amazing that after carrying this R6 bank around for all these millions of years that they should both 'go clear' on practically the same day!
Spring. I did the solo course and R6EW at ASHO on Temple and CC - OT3 at AOLA down on Westlake.Beginning or end of 1970?
Spring. I did the solo course and R6EW at ASHO on Temple and CC - OT3 at AOLA down on Westlake.
Mimsey