What's new

The Little Thread Which Grew - the Apollo '73 to Everything But

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I dropped out of shamanism. That doesn't mean I stopped understanding it. Just like I still understand Scientology. Existentialists can be Christians (Kierkegaard, Gabriel Marcel). I have been stating I dropped out of shamanism since the start. I never stated my beliefs other than to say I was Christian and existentialist. I don't see where I contradicted myself? Specifics?

I gave the contradictory quotes, Maria, where you stated you were both an agnostic and a Christian and I asked the specific question twice. Will you please answer it?

Do you believe in the Trinity of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit and that Jesus is the Saviour and Messiah? This is the basic belief of Christians. In other words, only Christians believe this, and you are not part of the belief system if you do not believe this.

It's very simple. I do not understand why this question confuses you. This is the third time I've asked it.

Nor have you explained how you can be both a Christian and an agnostic?
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I just wrote a blog post today on the question of fixing. I agree that beings cannot be 'fixed'. Thank you for saying it, as repeated from that book even though you yourself may not agree. I find that anything New Age is a waste of my personal time but I also get that others like it and so I won't bash anyone for that. I agree with what you said, let's not get bogged in minutiae....Yay, we can have fun together and let some stuff sort of ride by....like the way houses pass while looking from a car window....whole philosophies and disagreements can just pass too.


While I agree for the major part,

I disagree on beings cannot be fixed.

For we fix ourselves all the time thru observation, learning, experimenting, etc.

When one gets caught in a fixed idea system like scientology, or religion, we are stuck.

But, thinking outside the box leads to new ideas.

People every day fix themselves. They touch a hot plate, and go Fuk, bad move, and learn. Of course Hubbard turned this into an engram, secondary or lock. LOL
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I gave the contradictory quotes, Maria, where you stated you were both an agnostic and a Christian and I asked the specific question twice. Will you please answer it?

Do you believe in the Trinity of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit and that Jesus is the Saviour and Messiah? This is the basic belief of Christians. In other words, only Christians believe this, and you are not part of the belief system if you do not believe this.

It's very simple. I do not understand why this question confuses you. This is the third time I've asked it.

Nor have you explained how you can be both a Christian and an agnostic?

I see you marked "disagree" in answer.

So how is it that as a Christian, you are completely unaware of what Christianity is about and what Christians believe and don't share the beliefs?

Hmmm. Looking forward to seeing you explain that one after all your bragging on and on about superior education and knowledge of religions.

Yes, I am challenging you. No, I am not attacking you.

You are changing with the wind. That is the problem. I challenge you to give a coherent answer. IMHO, you have no idea WTF you actually believe. That's okay, but if so, have some humility and work on stabilizing your own beliefs before being overly concerned about others being wrong about their various spiritual interests and beliefs. Personal humility is an integral part of Christianity.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I see you marked "disagree" in answer.

So how is it that as a Christian, you are completely unaware of what Christianity is about and what Christians believe and don't share the beliefs?

Hmmm. Looking forward to seeing you explain that one after all your bragging on and on about superior education and knowledge of religions.

Yes, I am challenging you. No, I am not attacking you.

You are changing with the wind. That is the problem. I challenge you to give a coherent answer. IMHO, you have no idea WTF you actually believe. That's okay, but if so, have some humility and work on stabilizing your own beliefs before being overly concerned about others being wrong about their various spiritual interests and beliefs.

I have never explained what I understand of being a Christian so why do you say I am completely unaware of what it is about?? I don't think Christianity is about 'knowledge' or philosophy. If that helps.

Where did I change with the wind? I have no contradicted anything? Unless you can find exact places I did so? Which I don't think so. Also, I did share that I was a Christian. But this is an ex-scn blog. I am respectful of that.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I have never explained what I understand of being a Christian so why do you say I am completely unaware of what it is about?? I don't think Christianity is about 'knowledge' or philosophy. If that helps.

Where did I change with the wind? I have no contradicted anything? Unless you can find exact places I did so? Which I don't think so. Also, I did share that I was a Christian. But this is an ex-scn blog. I am respectful of that.

You still are not answering the question, but evading it. I've answered you. If you're just typing to fill the space, forget it. I'm not writing you another post just to repeat myself.

You do not decide what Christians believe. It's not a personal choice to say, "I don't believe the same as Christians, but I want to call myself one with beliefs that oppose it." That's hypocrisy.

The religion was already formed a couple of thousand of years ago. You either share in the beliefs or you do not. It's not rocket science, Maria. If you have your own brand of religion that doesn't believe in Jesus, good on ya. Christians believe in Jesus. There isn't room for the "I have a philosophy that doesn't believe in the Trinity or Jesus and choose Christianity with a belief system that conflicts with it."

You're either a Christian or you're not, and now you're playing games with words. Google is your friend. If you had no idea what Christianity was about when you "joined" it, then look it up.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

You still are not answering the question, but evading it. I've answered you. If you're just typing to fill the space, forget it. I'm not writing you another post just to repeat myself.

You do not decide what Christians believe. It's not a personal choice to say, "I don't believe the same as Christians, but I want to call myself one with beliefs that oppose it." That's hypocrisy.

The religion was already formed a couple of thousand of years ago. You either share in the beliefs or you do not. It's not rocket science, Maria. If you have your own brand of religion that doesn't believe in Jesus, good on ya. Christians believe in Jesus. There isn't room for the "I have a philosophy that doesn't believe in the Trinity or Jesus and choose Christianity with a belief system that conflicts with it."

You're either a Christian or you're not, and now you're playing games with words. Google is your friend. If you had no idea what Christianity was about when you "joined" it, then look it up.

I never said I decided! That quote was not by me.

Thanks for putting words in my mouth!
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

What do you mean the quote wasn't yours?

I quoted you saying "I guess I am agnostic" with your ID and link to quote.

I quoted you saying you chose Christianity with the link to the blog you claimed you wrote. I quoted you saying you are an existentialist, also with link. I could find lots of other quotes on all the different religions you are, but I don't care enough to bother. The point was the contradictory statements. Those three things were your direct quotes. Are you denying that?

So if it wasn't you I quoted, how many people are using your ID here that you can't keep track of what was written?

Do you have some misunderstanding on grammar and don't understand that quotes are also used to set off a phrase or for other things than quoting a person ? :duh:

Didn't you just say that you had lots of education on philosophy and religion? What about grammar?

Or is this another person again?
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I gave the contradictory quotes, Maria, where you stated you were both an agnostic and a Christian and I asked the specific question twice. Will you please answer it?

Do you believe in the Trinity of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit and that Jesus is the Saviour and Messiah? This is the basic belief of Christians. In other words, only Christians believe this, and you are not part of the belief system if you do not believe this.

It's very simple. I do not understand why this question confuses you. This is the third time I've asked it.

Nor have you explained how you can be both a Christian and an agnostic?

Shiela, God knows (sort of a play on words), I am no expert on Christianity. But isn't it true that the Catholics and many branches of Protestants don't share the same beliefs on some very fundamental parts of Christianity. Catholics believe in the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost. Protestant theology is that there is only one God, Jesus is the Son of God but he is not equated with being God. Another very fundamental difference has to do with who goes to heaven. I believe and PLEASE correct me if I am wrong, that Catholics and Protestants differ on this point, one Church insists that just accepting Christ as one's Savior is sufficient to guarantee that one makes it to Heaven while the other division of the Church believes that it is good works during one's life plus doing good works which get one into heaven and not just faith in Christ alone is sufficient to secure your eternity in Heaven.

My point is that people do not have to be in lockstep with every facet of Christianity in order to become a Christian!!

Shiela, let me ask you what one religion puts the most emphasis on Love? You look at Islam and Judaism and they don't really put much emphasis on loving one's neighbor as oneself. The big Eastern religions such as Buddhism and Hinduism may lean in this direction, especially Buddhism because if I am not mistaken, until recently, Hindu's believed in a caste system and certainly people were not taught to love the various castes below them. I don't believe that Buddha puts a big emphasis on love. \Buddhists may love others as themselves more for the reason of improving their Karma, again correct me if I am wrong. Other than some New Age types of religions which were big in the 60's, not too many religions promote Love.

Of course Scientology is the absolute worst religion in this regard. Love is looked at as being Woggy and it is connected with producing lower stats, there is no place in Scientology for someone to love others or even himself. Whatever love is present in a scientologist must be directed at LRH or DM!

The one large worldwide religion which has been around for a long time and does promote the concept of love is Christianity. Jesus taught to his followers to love oneself and to love thy neighbor as thyself. If a person is looking for a religion which at its core embraces the subject of Love then, almost by default it is likely that they will gravitate to Christianity. What's not to like about Jesus, he promoted love, he was a stirring speaker, a great philosopher and had a charisma about him that attracted large numbers of people to him. He says he is the Son of God and he will take responsibility for all your sins and all the other trappings of the Christian religion. Imagine a person looking for a religion which holds love as one of mankind's greatest values, it was founded by a great being who has many things about him which are easily admired. Wouldn't it make sense if such a person chose to practice the Christian faith under these circumstances, even if the do not subscribe to all of the claims and rituals of Christianity?
Lakey
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I gave the contradictory quotes, Maria, where you stated you were both an agnostic and a Christian and I asked the specific question twice. Will you please answer it?

Do you believe in the Trinity of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit and that Jesus is the Saviour and Messiah? This is the basic belief of Christians. In other words, only Christians believe this, and you are not part of the belief system if you do not believe this.

It's very simple. I do not understand why this question confuses you. This is the third time I've asked it.

Nor have you explained how you can be both a Christian and an agnostic?
i said I was agnostic about meditation. The word agnostic is not limited to the religious meaning. I am a faith alone christian and I believe the things you said. I thought that I was clear but now it feels I am being sec-checked. It feels quite hateful actually. To be agnostic about chocolate would mean to be able to have or not have it. I made that comment about meditation. Please reread it and please leave me alone as I feel harassed and find your reactions to be unkind and not an example of anything Christian. It would have been much more tactful to pm me as this line of interrogation is really not the way this thread is oriented. It's not a thread about why I am lying about being a Christian.

Lakey sorry your thread is derailed by me onto these themes which were not part of the general drift of the thread. I am out of town for a day or two and will check in Saturday or Sunday. ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Shiela, God knows (sort of a play on words), I am no expert on Christianity. But isn't it true that the Catholics and many branches of Protestants don't share the same beliefs on some very fundamental parts of Christianity. Catholics believe in the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost. Protestant theology is that there is only one God, Jesus is the Son of God but he is not equated with being God. Another very fundamental difference has to do with who goes to heaven. I believe and PLEASE correct me if I am wrong, that Catholics and Protestants differ on this point, one Church insists that just accepting Christ as one's Savior is sufficient to guarantee that one makes it to Heaven while the other division of the Church believes that it is good works during one's life plus doing good works which get one into heaven and not just faith in Christ alone is sufficient to secure your eternity in Heaven.

My point is that people do not have to be in lockstep with every facet of Christianity in order to become a Christian!!

Shiela, let me ask you what one religion puts the most emphasis on Love? You look at Islam and Judaism and they don't really put much emphasis on loving one's neighbor as oneself. The big Eastern religions such as Buddhism and Hinduism may lean in this direction, especially Buddhism because if I am not mistaken, until recently, Hindu's believed in a caste system and certainly people were not taught to love the various castes below them. I don't believe that Buddha puts a big emphasis on love. \Buddhists may love others as themselves more for the reason of improving their Karma, again correct me if I am wrong. Other than some New Age types of religions which were big in the 60's, not too many religions promote Love.

Of course Scientology is the absolute worst religion in this regard. Love is looked at as being Woggy and it is connected with producing lower stats, there is no place in Scientology for someone to love others or even himself. Whatever love is present in a scientologist must be directed at LRH or DM!

The one large worldwide religion which has been around for a long time and does promote the concept of love is Christianity. Jesus taught to his followers to love oneself and to love thy neighbor as thyself. If a person is looking for a religion which at its core embraces the subject of Love then, almost by default it is likely that they will gravitate to Christianity. What's not to like about Jesus, he promoted love, he was a stirring speaker, a great philosopher and had a charisma about him that attracted large numbers of people to him. He says he is the Son of God and he will take responsibility for all your sins and all the other trappings of the Christian religion. Imagine a person looking for a religion which holds love as one of mankind's greatest values, it was founded by a great being who has many things about him which are easily admired. Wouldn't it make sense if such a person chose to practice the Christian faith under these circumstances, even if the do not subscribe to all of the claims and rituals of Christianity?
Lakey

Thanks for your well-thought and well-written response, Lakey.

Respectfully, no, it is not true that Catholics believe in salvation through Jesus and Protestants believe in salvation through good works. Both believe that salvation only comes from faith in Jesus Christ. That is what all Christians believe, whether Catholic, Lutheran, Jehovah's Witness, Protestant, Greek Orthodox, Baptist, Church of England, etc. and that belief is one of the core beliefs of Christianity. Even Salvation Army, known so well for its good works and assistance of the poor and needy, does not believe salvation can come from good works alone, but only through believing in Jesus.

The first key difference between Protestants and Catholics is that Catholics believe the pope is infallible. Protestants do not. That was the first split. The Church of England was split from the Catholic Church and created by Henry VIII so he could get a divorce. The Baptists believe Baptism must be done as an adult, Catholics conduct Baptism on infants to forgive original sin (a very different interpretation between them). Catholics are against birth control, most (if not all) other Christian denominations are not. Those are the types of differences between different Christian churches, but the core beliefs are still the same - one of which is that salvation is not possible through good works alone - one must also believe in Jesus for salvation.

Regarding the Trinity, no, again, both Catholics and Protestants believe God is one through three, the Trinity. Jesus is also God, yet He is the Son of God. This is taken on faith, but open to interpretations of why this is so. Here's a great link that gives comparison of the beliefs: http://www.diffen.com/difference/Catholic_vs_Protestant

Christianity is the only (major) religion where salvation is not achieved by good works (as it is with Buddhism and Hinduism, for example), or by keeping the Law and ceremonies (Judaism) or similar.

Biblical Christianity alone comes under the heading of Divine Accomplishment. All the other religions of the world must be placed under the label of Human Achievement. Let's first consider some of the major religions, such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Judaism, and certain denominations or cults that profess to be Christian. http://www.thebereancall.org/content/works-salvation-delusion (Lakey, this is great article. Worth reading in full)

I hope that answers your basic questions, Lakey. Overall, Christians don't believe they are the only ones going to heaven (except a few sects, like Jehovah's Witnesses). They just believe that everyone else will be judged.

It is probably a difficult concept for one who is not a Christian and an easy one to scorn. I could write tomes of my interpretation of it, but let's save that for another time. To summarise my personal philosophical view and interpretation of it, to be part of God is so much bigger than all of us, more good and loving than anything we can imagine, that it takes a leap of faith to get out of our human mindset and the puny love we can give even when at our very best, and truly connect up to the vast and endless love of Jesus, of God, of the All, the One, who then replenishes us with love, hope, life and spirit. That is faith in Jesus. God the Father is so beyond human that we can't directly link up. Jesus is the Bridge. Jesus was man - He knows compassion and understands us. Perhaps this is all symbolic of something so abstract that it cannot be put in human concepts, but the concepts work well enough. To connect to the bigger good, to something so much more perfect than ourselves, to admit our faults, is bigger than any acts we do in life. That's my view, anyway. And just as we must choose to be left or right handed, we must choose our spiritual route.

So there is no such thing as someone who is both a Christian and Agnostic.

There are other things, too, though. A Christian is taught it is a cowardly and sinful act to ever deny or cover up his faith to others. (based on Peter's denial of Jesus and subsequent Biblical references). Judaism also teaches this. A Christian is taught that he is fallible and weak and strength comes from being in a state of Grace and having a connection to God through Jesus. That State of Grace is through humility, honesty, hard work, prayer and good acts. It is extremely important to a Christian that all miracles, supernatural events, etc. are attributed to God - it is blasphemous to claim personal credit like some sort of guru. Individually, our abilities are limited. Not so as a community connected through God. Community is very important in Christianity.

I don't know if Christians are the most loving or not. I'm not sure it's even fair to compare religions or atheists in that way. I've personally been loved and helped by bighearted people from all walks and beliefs and atheists as well. I'm glad to know you have such a high opinion of Christians, though, and you've known some really honorable ones.

Thanks for the chat, Lakey.

x x x

Sheila
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Thanks for your well-thought and well-written response, Lakey.

Respectfully, no, it is not true that Catholics believe in salvation through Jesus and Protestants believe in salvation through good works. Both believe that salvation only comes from faith in Jesus Christ. That is what all Christians believe, whether Catholic, Lutheran, Jehovah's Witness, Protestant, Greek Orthodox, Baptist, Church of England, etc. and that belief is one of the core beliefs of Christianity. Even Salvation Army, known so well for its good works and assistance of the poor and needy, does not believe salvation can come from good works alone, but only through believing in Jesus.

The first key difference between Protestants and Catholics is that Catholics believe the pope is infallible. Protestants do not. That was the first split. The Church of England was split from the Catholic Church and created by Henry VIII so he could get a divorce. The Baptists believe Baptism must be done as an adult, Catholics conduct Baptism on infants to forgive original sin (a very different interpretation between them). Catholics are against birth control, most (if not all) other Christian denominations are not. Those are the types of differences between different Christian churches, but the core beliefs are still the same - one of which is that salvation is not possible through good works alone - one must also believe in Jesus for salvation.

Regarding the Trinity, no, again, both Catholics and Protestants believe God is one through three, the Trinity. Jesus is also God, yet He is the Son of God. This is taken on faith, but open to interpretations of why this is so. Here's a great link that gives comparison of the beliefs: http://www.diffen.com/difference/Catholic_vs_Protestant

Christianity is the only (major) religion where salvation is not achieved by good works (as it is with Buddhism and Hinduism, for example), or by keeping the Law and ceremonies (Judaism) or similar.

Biblical Christianity alone comes under the heading of Divine Accomplishment. All the other religions of the world must be placed under the label of Human Achievement. Let's first consider some of the major religions, such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Judaism, and certain denominations or cults that profess to be Christian. http://www.thebereancall.org/content/works-salvation-delusion (Lakey, this is great article. Worth reading in full)

I hope that answers your basic questions, Lakey. Overall, Christians don't believe they are the only ones going to heaven (except a few sects, like Jehovah's Witnesses). They just believe that everyone else will be judged.

It is probably a difficult concept for one who is not a Christian and an easy one to scorn. I could write tomes of my interpretation of it, but let's save that for another time. To summarise my personal philosophical view and interpretation of it, to be part of God is so much bigger than all of us, more good and loving than anything we can imagine, that it takes a leap of faith to get out of our human mindset and the puny love we can give even when at our very best, and truly connect up to the vast and endless love of Jesus, of God, of the All, the One, who then replenishes us with love, hope, life and spirit. That is faith in Jesus. God the Father is so beyond human that we can't directly link up. Jesus is the Bridge. Jesus was man - He knows compassion and understands us. Perhaps this is all symbolic of something so abstract that it cannot be put in human concepts, but the concepts work well enough. To connect to the bigger good, to something so much more perfect than ourselves, to admit our faults, is bigger than any acts we do in life. That's my view, anyway. And just as we must choose to be left or right handed, we must choose our spiritual route.

So there is no such thing as someone who is both a Christian and Agnostic.

There are other things, too, though. A Christian is taught it is a cowardly and sinful act to ever deny or cover up his faith to others. (based on Peter's denial of Jesus and subsequent Biblical references). Judaism also teaches this. A Christian is taught that he is fallible and weak and strength comes from being in a state of Grace and having a connection to God through Jesus. That State of Grace is through humility, honesty, hard work, prayer and good acts. It is extremely important to a Christian that all miracles, supernatural events, etc. are attributed to God - it is blasphemous to claim personal credit like some sort of guru. Individually, our abilities are limited. Not so as a community connected through God. Community is very important in Christianity.

I don't know if Christians are the most loving or not. I'm not sure it's even fair to compare religions or atheists in that way. I've personally been loved and helped by bighearted people from all walks and beliefs and atheists as well. I'm glad to know you have such a high opinion of Christians, though, and you've known some really honorable ones.

Thanks for the chat, Lakey.

x x x

Sheila

The previous exchanges were received as rude and unkind by me and about me and filled with false assumptions about me. I will be ignoring further correspondence from you Sheila for that reason. Lakey I would prefer not to discuss this topic further (others can discuss it all they want; I will only post on other topics) as it is provoking borderline ad hominem attacks of me and why I have no clue since I have tried to be polite and considerate generally. Anyone wishing to ask me about my Christian beliefs can pm me since I will not discuss it here. I have been accused of a few things here that I find startling, why I do not know. I for one will be returning to discussions of Scientology which is what this forum is about. For the record, I was saying I was agnostic about meditation. Terril seemed to get that since he asked what path I was on AFTER the agnostic about meditation remark. Also for the record no human is my judge. Only God. Other accusations were made, conclusions jumped to, with not a shred of benefit of the doubt. How such treatment of others wins respect I cannot know. I won't even deign the secondary accusations worthy of response for that reason. Btw I have never accused Christians of wrong understanding of God. NEVER DID THAT. Why am I being badgered and jeered - because I dont approve of CoS?? Of their 'tech'? Is this a CoS dead-agenting? Baffling accusations otherwise.

Thank you to anyone regardless of beliefs who has shared and talked with me so far. I have learned things and had fun and hope to continue. I don't believe in reporting others or banning so my decision to ignore will be my only step in this matter. Oh and I was expecting to be scolded by non-believers, not a Christian. This has shocked me and was entirely unexpected. Weird really.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sola_fide (faith alone)

Since I am not perfect, I guess I mis-wrote 'only' instead of 'alone'. I fixed this error. I meant to use the word alone in the phrase faith alone. The faith alone understanding comes from Luther. It is not a cult. It is the Protestant reformation.
 
Last edited:
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

i said I was agnostic about meditation. The word agnostic is not limited to the religious meaning. I am a faith only christian and I believe the things you said. I thought that I was clear but now it feels I am being sec-checked. It feels quite hateful actually. To be agnostic about chocolate would mean to be able to have or not have it. I made that comment about meditation. Please reread it and please leave me alone as I feel harassed and find your reactions to be unkind and not an example of anything Christian. It would have been much more tactful to pm me as this line of interrogation is really not the way this thread is oriented. It's not a thread about why I am lying about being a Christian.

Maria, sometimes I am blunt. I will not apologise for that - you are on a forum, not in a counseling session, not writing in a diary. Anything written on a forum is open to discussion by others. I asked you some questions and you skated and skated around them. Then when you finally answered (quote above), you still avoided answering the questions and instead, tried to divert attention to me as if asking you to answer a question was some sort of horrible thing done to you. :eyeroll: There is no crime in asking another to be straightforward and honest, especially after you've been writing for weeks and weeks criticizing others' beliefs, including Christian beliefs. i.e., your dreaming thread, for one)

I do not know any sect of Christianity called a "faith only" branch of Christianity. Please either provide the link or stop making up terms which do not exist in order to avoid answering a direct question with a direct answer.

Christians do not hide their beliefs. Don't make me give you Biblical references. Just give me the link to the secretive "faith only" branch of Christianity that you follow, or please stop being so weird and evasive about it. If you made a mistake, fair enough, be humble enough to admit it.

If you don't have the courage to stand up and state your own beliefs, please stop criticizing and judging others who have more courage and integrity than you to state their own. Don't tell me that Christians have the wrong concept of God. How would you know? Who or what gives you the authority to decide whose concept is right or wrong? Who appointed you judge?

Speaking of Christianity:

Judge not, that ye be not judged.
[SUP]2[/SUP] For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
[SUP]3[/SUP] And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
[SUP]4[/SUP] Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

Matthew 7:1-4
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

:biggrin:

Gib and others. I will respond better later on the idea of humans fixing each other with spiritual tech. Until I can do so, here is my blog post on that. Maybe nothing or maybe something in the blog post will be of interest. I realize it is an unusual statement that by human means and spiritual technologies I don't believe we can fix ourselves.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/entry.ph...quot-technologies-quot-or-quot-knowledge-quot
 
Last edited:
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I gave the contradictory quotes, Maria, where you stated you were both an agnostic and a Christian and I asked the specific question twice. Will you please answer it?

Do you believe in the Trinity of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit and that Jesus is the Saviour and Messiah? This is the basic belief of Christians. In other words, only Christians believe this, and you are not part of the belief system if you do not believe this.

It's very simple. I do not understand why this question confuses you. This is the third time I've asked it.

Nor have you explained how you can be both a Christian and an agnostic?
Most Christians are agnostics. "Agnostic" does not mean atheist.

An agnostic is one who does not attempt to discover spiritual truths for themselves; they don't ask questions, they don't pull the string, they don't try to figure out how something could be when the evidence points in the opposite direction. They simply believe. What was good enough for their ancestors is good enough for them.

A gnostic, on the the other hand, is someone who wants to know everything they can -- who, what, where, when, why, and how. If they don't like the theories they've been taught, they will come up with some of their own. But they're not really interested in what someone else has to say on the subject -- except as a hypothesis to be tested and discarded as necessary.

I consider myself a gnostic. I've noticed contradictions in spiritual ideas and came up with a synthesis in the best Hegelian fashion. Some of them are pretty weird, but don't be too surprised if they are proven some day.


[replying to Maria] If you had no idea what Christianity was about when you "joined" it, ... .
I had no idea what Christianity was about when I "joined" it. I was joined to it at a young age by my parents, who couldn't have cared less what I wanted.

Just my $.02.

Helena
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Most Christians are agnostics. "Agnostic" does not mean atheist.

An agnostic is one who does not attempt to discover spiritual truths for themselves; they don't ask questions, they don't pull the string, they don't try to figure out how something could be when the evidence points in the opposite direction. They simply believe. What was good enough for their ancestors is good enough for them.

A gnostic, on the the other hand, is someone who wants to know everything they can -- who, what, where, when, why, and how. If they don't like the theories they've been taught, they will come up with some of their own. But they're not really interested in what someone else has to say on the subject -- except as a hypothesis to be tested and discarded as necessary.

I consider myself a gnostic. I've noticed contradictions in spiritual ideas and came up with a synthesis in the best Hegelian fashion. Some of them are pretty weird, but don't be too surprised if they are proven some day.



I had no idea what Christianity was about when I "joined" it. I was joined to it at a young age by my parents, who couldn't have cared less what I wanted.

Just my $.02.

Helena


Interesting definition for agnostic. I never heard that one before. I was using the non-religious sense of it, as below.:)

1.1(In a nonreligious context) having a doubtful or noncommittal attitudetoward something:until now I’ve been fairlyagnostic about electoral reformMORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES
 
Last edited:
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Most Christians are agnostics. "Agnostic" does not mean atheist.

An agnostic is one who does not attempt to discover spiritual truths for themselves; they don't ask questions, they don't pull the string, they don't try to figure out how something could be when the evidence points in the opposite direction. They simply believe. What was good enough for their ancestors is good enough for them.

A gnostic, on the the other hand, is someone who wants to know everything they can -- who, what, where, when, why, and how. If they don't like the theories they've been taught, they will come up with some of their own. But they're not really interested in what someone else has to say on the subject -- except as a hypothesis to be tested and discarded as necessary.

I consider myself a gnostic. I've noticed contradictions in spiritual ideas and came up with a synthesis in the best Hegelian fashion. Some of them are pretty weird, but don't be too surprised if they are proven some day.



I had no idea what Christianity was about when I "joined" it. I was joined to it at a young age by my parents, who couldn't have cared less what I wanted.

Just my $.02.

Helena

Well, here's my understanding...
Atheist: "There is no god. Period."
Agnostic: "I know of no god."

Depending on my mood-of-the-day, either one or the other fits for me. My definitions don't need to be more complicated than that. :coolwink:
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Some thoughts for my friends here on this thread, whether FZ, totally out like me, or Indie.

Attacking Others
I have always tried not to attack specific persons or accuse them of things. I once speculated on something Terril said. However, I was being hypothetical. I never intended that what I said was more than speculative. I regretted that and it's the only time I know of that something I said could be taken personally and I was sorry it happened.

Criticizing Christians
There is no time I have criticized Christians on this forum. I know this because I have only posted about that topic on the comments section of my Age of Answers blog post. I never really discuss that topic. I only posted it when asked by Lakey as a question. In general I don't discuss my religious beliefs because this is about Scientology here. I have never judged Christians and changed the concept of God oir Christianity on this forum. I have never explained partly because never fully been asked to explain what my view of Christianity is. If I were going to explain it, I would do it in a different thread which pertained to non-Scientology beliefs since I would not want to tax Lakey's thread with things which might not be of interest to non-Christians. I want to be considerate.

Talking about Christianity
I don't talk about Christianity because I am here to talk about being an ex-Scientologist. How and when I would ever feel it appropriate to share on Christianity? I don't proselytize. If that is being a 'bad' Christian, such is life. There are different ways to convey things other than shouting dogma at others. I prefer to talk to others and let them be. Christianity is conveyed through actions, not just words. The recent actions in the thread do not seem Christian by any stretch of the imagination. What these actions were is yet to be determined.

Answering questions
I have always been forthcoming and answered questions. Accusations are quite different. Anyone wanting to know what 'faith alone' is could simply ask me, what do you mean by 'faith alone?' This would be a lot nicer than rushing to the ridicule. BTW I provided a wiki link to this term, faith alone, in a previous post. I can only answer one question at a time, not a barrage. A barrage is what Scn loves to do. Like they did to Rinder in the doctor's parking area.


Philosophy, religion, and me
I don't believe that technology and philosophy are the same thing as religion. I don't think that these are compatible. Not at all. There is no philosophy or tech that pertains to religion in my opinion, for me. Techniques imply works needing to be done via human means to be free. Faith alone means that I don't feel that 'works' or techniques help me. I have written about this in a blog post. And since I am a philosopher, not a theologian, I never claimed expertise in religion. I have never posted much on that topic anyway. I don't view Scientology as religion or philosophy or tech so what I post on is a cult. I know about that because I was in it. So I do have expertise in the cult and can post about that experience and knowledge. So I do speak out on what I know, mostly for my own clarification and to do memory lane with all of you.

Conclusion
Questions are welcome from my friends here but I am out of town for a day and cannot answer until tomorrow sometime, thus a delay. Take care. :biggrin:
This thread is exciting and fun, never a dull moment! Hurrah! And thank you for that Lakey.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Thanks for your well-thought and well-written response, Lakey.

Respectfully, no, it is not true that Catholics believe in salvation through Jesus and Protestants believe in salvation through good works. Both believe that salvation only comes from faith in Jesus Christ. That is what all Christians believe, whether Catholic, Lutheran, Jehovah's Witness, Protestant, Greek Orthodox, Baptist, Church of England, etc. and that belief is one of the core beliefs of Christianity. Even Salvation Army, known so well for its good works and assistance of the poor and needy, does not believe salvation can come from good works alone, but only through believing in Jesus.

The first key difference between Protestants and Catholics is that Catholics believe the pope is infallible. Protestants do not. That was the first split. The Church of England was split from the Catholic Church and created by Henry VIII so he could get a divorce. The Baptists believe Baptism must be done as an adult, Catholics conduct Baptism on infants to forgive original sin (a very different interpretation between them). Catholics are against birth control, most (if not all) other Christian denominations are not. Those are the types of differences between different Christian churches, but the core beliefs are still the same - one of which is that salvation is not possible through good works alone - one must also believe in Jesus for salvation.

Regarding the Trinity, no, again, both Catholics and Protestants believe God is one through three, the Trinity. Jesus is also God, yet He is the Son of God. This is taken on faith, but open to interpretations of why this is so. Here's a great link that gives comparison of the beliefs: http://www.diffen.com/difference/Catholic_vs_Protestant

Christianity is the only (major) religion where salvation is not achieved by good works (as it is with Buddhism and Hinduism, for example), or by keeping the Law and ceremonies (Judaism) or similar.

Biblical Christianity alone comes under the heading of Divine Accomplishment. All the other religions of the world must be placed under the label of Human Achievement. Let's first consider some of the major religions, such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Judaism, and certain denominations or cults that profess to be Christian. http://www.thebereancall.org/content/works-salvation-delusion (Lakey, this is great article. Worth reading in full)

I hope that answers your basic questions, Lakey. Overall, Christians don't believe they are the only ones going to heaven (except a few sects, like Jehovah's Witnesses). They just believe that everyone else will be judged.

It is probably a difficult concept for one who is not a Christian and an easy one to scorn. I could write tomes of my interpretation of it, but let's save that for another time. To summarise my personal philosophical view and interpretation of it, to be part of God is so much bigger than all of us, more good and loving than anything we can imagine, that it takes a leap of faith to get out of our human mindset and the puny love we can give even when at our very best, and truly connect up to the vast and endless love of Jesus, of God, of the All, the One, who then replenishes us with love, hope, life and spirit. That is faith in Jesus. God the Father is so beyond human that we can't directly link up. Jesus is the Bridge. Jesus was man - He knows compassion and understands us. Perhaps this is all symbolic of something so abstract that it cannot be put in human concepts, but the concepts work well enough. To connect to the bigger good, to something so much more perfect than ourselves, to admit our faults, is bigger than any acts we do in life. That's my view, anyway. And just as we must choose to be left or right handed, we must choose our spiritual route.

So there is no such thing as someone who is both a Christian and Agnostic.

There are other things, too, though. A Christian is taught it is a cowardly and sinful act to ever deny or cover up his faith to others. (based on Peter's denial of Jesus and subsequent Biblical references). Judaism also teaches this. A Christian is taught that he is fallible and weak and strength comes from being in a state of Grace and having a connection to God through Jesus. That State of Grace is through humility, honesty, hard work, prayer and good acts. It is extremely important to a Christian that all miracles, supernatural events, etc. are attributed to God - it is blasphemous to claim personal credit like some sort of guru. Individually, our abilities are limited. Not so as a community connected through God. Community is very important in Christianity.

I don't know if Christians are the most loving or not. I'm not sure it's even fair to compare religions or atheists in that way. I've personally been loved and helped by bighearted people from all walks and beliefs and atheists as well. I'm glad to know you have such a high opinion of Christians, though, and you've known some really honorable ones.

Thanks for the chat, Lakey.

x x x

Sheila

Sheila, thank you for all the effort you put into your post, and for giving me links to sites which will clear up what the differences are between various Christian denominations. I am going to check out those links and get myself better educated in Christianity.

In my self perceived role as a mediator on this thread, I just took a stab at moderating a dispute. I now realize that I was in error for doing that. It was not my place to make guesses and present scenarios on a subject which in which I am not knowledgeable. My goal to mediate may have been okay, but I really had no business butting in on an exchange which was going on between two regular posters on the thread.

It is not my place to speak for Maria, she has been doing a pretty damn good job of speaking for herself since she has arrived on this thread. As Maria has pointed out, the purpose of this thread is to concern itself with scientology and ex scientology. Sure the Apollo thread has traditionally got into other major topics but if two regulars here disagree on an outside topic, I should stay out of their dispute or at least check with them first via PM's to see if it is okay with them if I put in my 2 cents. Ditto for all other posters as well. In summary, I should have stayed out of this but instead I wrote something, doing a bypass on Maria by writing speculations in an subject in which I am not knowledgeable. That was a huge screw up on my part and I apologize profusely.
Lakey
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

The previous exchanges were received as rude and unkind by me and about me and filled with false assumptions about me. I will be ignoring further correspondence from you Sheila for that reason. Lakey I would prefer not to discuss this topic further (others can discuss it all they want; I will only post on other topics) as it is provoking borderline ad hominem attacks of me and why I have no clue since I have tried to be polite and considerate generally. Anyone wishing to ask me about my Christian beliefs can pm me since I will not discuss it here. I have been accused of a few things here that I find startling, why I do not know. I for one will be returning to discussions of Scientology which is what this forum is about. For the record, I was saying I was agnostic about meditation. Terril seemed to get that since he asked what path I was on AFTER the agnostic about meditation remark. Also for the record no human is my judge. Only God. Other accusations were made, conclusions jumped to, with not a shred of benefit of the doubt. How such treatment of others wins respect I cannot know. I won't even deign the secondary accusations worthy of response for that reason. Btw I have never accused Christians of wrong understanding of God. NEVER DID THAT. Why am I being badgered and jeered - because I dont approve of CoS?? Of their 'tech'? Is this a CoS dead-agenting? Baffling accusations otherwise.

Thank you to anyone regardless of beliefs who has shared and talked with me so far. I have learned things and had fun and hope to continue. I don't believe in reporting others or banning so my decision to ignore will be my only step in this matter. Oh and I was expecting to be scolded by non-believers, not a Christian. This has shocked me and was entirely unexpected. Weird really.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sola_fide (faith alone)

Since I am not perfect, I guess I mis-wrote 'only' instead of 'alone'. I fixed this error. I meant to use the word alone in the phrase faith alone. The faith alone understanding comes from Luther. It is not a cult. It is the Protestant reformation.

Maria, I already apologized to you in my earlier reply to Sheila. I was acting stupidly, figuring that as the thread OP and moderator, I should attempt a post to moderate your dispute with Sheila. My goal might have been okay but before proceeding, I should have PM'd and gotten your okay. I really messed up!! What I did was bypass you and make speculations which might explain your actions to Sheila. Bypassing someone who is doing an excellent job on her own is probably one of the worst things one can do to an ex scio. That type of thing was being done to us when we were inside COS and nothing like that should ever occur on ESMB. Despite having that knowledge, I went ahead and did it. I don't know what I was thinking. I apologize profusely. It will never happen again, I guarantee you that.
Lakey
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Maria, I already apologized to you in my earlier reply to Sheila. I was acting stupidly, figuring that as the thread OP and moderator, I should attempt a post to moderate your dispute with Sheila. My goal might have been okay but before proceeding, I should have PM'd and gotten your okay. I really messed up!! What I did was bypass you and make speculations which might explain your actions to Sheila. Bypassing someone who is doing an excellent job on her own is probably one of the worst things one can do to an ex scio. That type of thing was being done to us when we were inside COS and nothing like that should ever occur on ESMB. Despite having that knowledge, I went ahead and did it. I don't know what I was thinking. I apologize profusely. It will never happen again, I guarantee you that.
Lakey

My only objection was being attacked, the nearly there ad hominems. Those should never be allowed and I felt them directed at me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top