I told you I was trouble
Suspended animation
I mentioned earlier that thisabilityaffliction lasted 2 days not even
giving me a chance to further explore.
FIFY.
I mentioned earlier that thisabilityaffliction lasted 2 days not even
giving me a chance to further explore.
Consider this, If your post were to cause just one person to fall into scientology. To spend all their time, all their effort, all their money on scientology. To fall into the belief that giving all of those things is worth that and more because they are helping to save mankind, (just the mindset that a person is, saving mankind, itself is beyond arrogant) and they spend decades of their life following that belief. Is there any way to justify that? I don't mean justify it to yourself, I mean justify it to that person. I mean justify to all the people in that person's life. Believing it yourself doesn't make it truly what you present it to be because it is filtered through a scientology lens.I know many do not think it a good look here. Many
consider it is. This of course is up for debate. Play ground
humour is not worth debating or even considering.
jee-yay-ziss Hoaxy....
1969...."Summer of Love" (or was it '68?)
I was a teenie in high school, and at the same time I first heard of and got into Scientology.
"Winter of ARC" ensued.
I spent 7+ years protesting at Orgs with Anons. IConsider this, If your post were to cause just one person to fall into scientology. To spend all their time, all their effort, all their money on scientology. To fall into the belief that giving all of those things is worth that and more because they are helping to save mankind, (just the mindset that a person is, saving mankind, itself is beyond arrogant) and they spend decades of their life following that belief. Is there any way to justify that? I don't mean justify it to yourself, I mean justify it to that person. I mean justify to all the people in that person's life. Believing it yourself doesn't make it truly what you present it to be because it is filtered through a scientology lens.
LOL
what about now ?????
Fall of LFBD ????
...
Look even the cat can do it and he never did any Hubtard grade.
My knowingness tells me that you have not fully duplicated that photo, on this planet.
Under greater magnification I discovered that those are actually dimension points that the being operating the operating cat's body mocked up.
as I am neither from or on this planet
Could you walk through the events that caused you to realize that you had the ability to control flows of static electricity around your body? How you controlled it. How you knew it was being controlled. What you actually saw as you were controlling it.Suck it and see . To answer Strati's points I believe the
concept of the ser fac was first stated by Hubbard. Also
I don't see a problem with stealing ideas from others. To
then make such a fuss over being "source" was not so elegant.
This is how knowledge develops.
"A good composer does not imitate, he steals.” – Igor Stravinsky
You can find this quote attributed to him.
“Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different”. T.S Eliot
I established this worked by recieving grade 4. I went up
the pole on this. I felt fantastic. A day or two later I found
I briefly I could control flows of static electicity around
my body.
Here is a new Ask the Scientologist post inspired by Terril's wonderful stories about how workable Scientology is. First post in over 2 years.
After grade 4 I felt fantastic. More so than at anyCould you walk through the events that caused you to realize that you had the ability to control flows of static electricity around your body? How you controlled it. How you knew it was being controlled. What you actually saw as you were controlling it.
After grade 4 I felt fantastic. More so than at any
time since. In Scn this was described as going up the pole,
and was a temporary state which lasted about 2 days. I found
by chance I could feel electric type sensations going up my
arms. I also found I could move these sensations around, by
intending them to. They seemed electrical in nature and I
thought I'd try to get them to attract small pieces of paper
in one hand by bringing It near the other as it seemed to me
to be caused by static electricity. I was able to do this.
Put a sock in it! Someone asked me a question and IYou're either completely deluded or just very easily pleased and complacent Terril ... neither are things that a sane person (who is apparently looking for spiritual enlightenment) would willingly pay money for.
I'd be getting someone else to do the PR and sales for the freezone if I were you.
Put a sock in it! Someone asked me a question and I
politely answered.
Note that I don't get involved with sales of anything.
Mission Statement
Have you given up hope of making it this lifetime?
Were arbitraries put in your way, such as needless sec-checks?
Were you turned off by repeated demands for money that seemed inappropriate?
Have you been disappointed with your progress on the bridge?
Well, now there is hope. Practitioners in the Freezone do not have unwarranted illegal declares. We want to handle, not have disconnection.
We want to deliver standard LRH tech to all those who wish it. We are open to ALL, even the C of S’s failed cases.
Our goal is the creation of Free Beings.
There are several Class VIII’s among us, as well as Pat Krenik, OT 8, class 6. She has studied Scn since 1951, including under LRH, and grew up with the tech.
We have an internet management org and delivery orgs in several countries.
You may contact me, Terril Park, at:
[email protected] for further info.
We’re working hard to deliver standard Scn, the way LRH would have wanted us to.
“Service” (POLICY LETTER OF 29 OCTOBER 1959 II)
“We will win if we are [Scn] not a lot of isolated groups.
The watchword is SERVICE.”
Terril,Put a sock in it! Someone asked me a question and I
politely answered.
Note that I don't get involved with sales of anything.
This is one of the best-written rationales for why techies are attacked here on ESMB that I have seen. This is far better than the rabid and visceral "because Hubbard was a fat con artist" type responses that are usually given. Of course, the implication of what you say is that Hubbard WAS a con artist, but that's besides the point.Terril,
I respect you for continuing to show up here even though you regularly get challenged on your beliefs. Most Scientology-believers don't persist. That is actually admirable.
However, I'm not sure you understand why I, for one, will continue to jump on any statement you make about the "workability" of Hubbard's "tech".
It isn't just that I'm out and therefore just hate Scientology because of what I've been through.
I've been trained. I've been Sea Org. I understand the "tech". The "tech" isn't just useless, as I've stated. It is evil. I know you don't agree. You only see benefits.
I see a cleverly designed trap: Huge, amazing promises of higher states of being -- a temporary feeling of euphoria -- no actual, permanent, significant improvement -- but "the next step, or the one after that, will surely give me the promised 'higher state'."
Once on that treadmill, the believer is trapped. "I didn't get to homo novis yet, but I will, I will!" The believer is trapped and cannot step back and say "I haven't gotten what was promised -- it doesn't work". No, the believer thinks the "next step" will do it. Because he or she believes so strongly, they must blind themselves to reality. The longer it goes on, the farther from reality a person gets.
Sure, the prices might be much lower in the independent field, but the trap is the same. That's what's wrong. That is why I continue to challenge anyone who only talks about the alleged "benefits" of Hubbard's "tech".
Terril,
I respect you for continuing to show up here even though you regularly get challenged on your beliefs. Most Scientology-believers don't persist. That is actually admirable.
However, I'm not sure you understand why I, for one, will continue to jump on any statement you make about the "workability" of Hubbard's "tech".
It isn't just that I'm out and therefore just hate Scientology because of what I've been through.
I've been trained. I've been Sea Org. I understand the "tech". The "tech" isn't just useless, as I've stated. It is evil. I know you don't agree. You only see benefits.
I see a cleverly designed trap: Huge, amazing promises of higher states of being -- a temporary feeling of euphoria -- no actual, permanent, significant improvement -- but "the next step, or the one after that, will surely give me the promised 'higher state'."
Once on that treadmill, the believer is trapped. "I didn't get to homo novis yet, but I will, I will!" The believer is trapped and cannot step back and say "I haven't gotten what was promised -- it doesn't work". No, the believer thinks the "next step" will do it. Because he or she believes so strongly, they must blind themselves to reality. The longer it goes on, the farther from reality a person gets.
Sure, the prices might be much lower in the independent field, but the trap is the same. That's what's wrong. That is why I continue to challenge anyone who only talks about the alleged "benefits" of Hubbard's "tech".