Flag-2005
Patron with Honors
I have had this conversation many times before but all within the course room so it quickly gets squashed.
E-meter sensitivity and how it works.
You do a body motion and squeeze the cans to get a 1/3 drop.
Why?
So the needle is not wild in session and will not easily go off the dial from body motions?
Or because it is reflective of case at that moment and it works out that you can see reads more easily?
But are we measuring his largest most likely body motion for the coming session or how is his squeeze, a body motion reflective of his case at the time?
So how is a can squeeze reflective of havingness?
To find a havingness process you squeeze and note the size, run the havingness 8-10 times or whatever and ideally the same squeeze should increase the size of the needle movement.
Why?
Is his havingness up and so he now squeezes harder and so the larger swing?
Or the larger swing at that same sensitivity means his case has less resistance and so the needle is looser?
Who thinks what? Or maybe its only me with this issue?
note: I write this becasue the VAST majority of FSO interns do not complete their internship becasue of non-perfect can-squeeze. Basically if you start the session and the pc takes four squeezes to get it exactly you have failed that video. Even if you get a perfect session.
So the pc takes four squeezes to get it and from that point the auditor is thinking I failed already and tries to end the session as fast as possible because the video is a flunk. It even gets this bad. - 4 squeezes, tired hungry? No!
deep breath and let it out... LFBD.... Auditor says, 'sorry not enough metab' and gets the pc out of the chair to take a walk get a drink etc. All for the case of a passing video. FSO short sessioned PCs now know why!
E-meter sensitivity and how it works.
You do a body motion and squeeze the cans to get a 1/3 drop.
Why?
So the needle is not wild in session and will not easily go off the dial from body motions?
Or because it is reflective of case at that moment and it works out that you can see reads more easily?
But are we measuring his largest most likely body motion for the coming session or how is his squeeze, a body motion reflective of his case at the time?
So how is a can squeeze reflective of havingness?
To find a havingness process you squeeze and note the size, run the havingness 8-10 times or whatever and ideally the same squeeze should increase the size of the needle movement.
Why?
Is his havingness up and so he now squeezes harder and so the larger swing?
Or the larger swing at that same sensitivity means his case has less resistance and so the needle is looser?
Who thinks what? Or maybe its only me with this issue?
note: I write this becasue the VAST majority of FSO interns do not complete their internship becasue of non-perfect can-squeeze. Basically if you start the session and the pc takes four squeezes to get it exactly you have failed that video. Even if you get a perfect session.
So the pc takes four squeezes to get it and from that point the auditor is thinking I failed already and tries to end the session as fast as possible because the video is a flunk. It even gets this bad. - 4 squeezes, tired hungry? No!
deep breath and let it out... LFBD.... Auditor says, 'sorry not enough metab' and gets the pc out of the chair to take a walk get a drink etc. All for the case of a passing video. FSO short sessioned PCs now know why!