This I think is Pilot's most promising line of enquiry (though he never built on it as far as I can see). This is from post 61 to the ARS; I've kept the spelling mistakes in as it wouldn't be Ken without them.
==========================================
subj : Super Scio Tech - TECH BREAKTHROUGH
TECH BREAKTHROUGH
In spite of all the distractions, I haven't totaly abandoned
the research. I've been doing a bit more handling on how all
of us push mental machinery and control lines into each other
which was inspired by cross correlating CBR's and my own work.
And I've been thinking more about the present time continuous
creation of relality, and the recent Avatar postings have
helped with that one. And I was talking to a lot of freezoners
over the weekend, getting reminded of various technical areas.
I even talked to one guy who was on the R6 course in 1964 and
that helped me get some of Ron's final work in that area
into persepective.
And so I was connecting to a lot of different technologies,
all valid, all lying there as pieces of the puzzel, and
experiencing a great deal of cross fertilization.
And then I was sitting there talking to a friend and we were
discussing the need to keep moving forward on any line as
long as it was a move in the direction of freedom and
understanding, so as to avoid being stopped and having stops
go into restimulation. And he was drawing an analogy to
studying computers in a situation where all data was not
available but some was, and so you study what is available
with the confidence that the different lines, which might
seem disrelated, will come together eventually.
And I thought of the entity oriented approach and the
R6 oriented approach and all the other almost contradictory
but sporatically workable approaches and suddenly everything
fell together into a cohesive whole.
There are 4 broad areas of tech:
1. The objective present time oriented tech including OT
drills, Avatar, objectives, etc.
2. The grades style tech, including many freezone things which
the CofS would not call grades but which are working the same
kind of thing from different angles.
3. The theta line, entity, plugs, machines, and what have
you type handlings.
4. The item or pattern oriented stuff that relates to R6
and GPMs and implants etc.
I'm talking here about 4 classes of things rather than
specific approaches or processes or theories about individual
types of things within the broad areas.
And the areas seemed slightly in conflict as to theory. But
the exact same difficulty might well resolve on handling
from any of the 4 areas, indicating that all formed a part
of what might be holding a particular abberation in place.
And so there had to be a broader viewpoint from which
all of these were part of the same cohesive whole.
And it had to be happening now, in present time, because
of objective PT processes being part of the puzzel.
And it had to involve grades style whys because they run
well, and that especially brings to mind overts and
motivators, which would say that we are doing it to each
other now in PT.
And the whole entity business, especially this bit about
pushing control entities on each other, would have to be
the delivery mechanism.
And that leaves R6 like patterns, items, implants, gpms,
or whatever, as what is being delivered, which is not to
say that we have the PT pattern, but we may be close what
with all the research into these things.
So here it is, the unified theory:
WE ARE NOW IN PT IMPLANTING EACH OTHER ON A COMPULSIVE
BASIS BELOW OUR CONSCIOUS LEVEL OF AWARENESS.
The entity mechanisms are how we do it.
The R6 type stuff is what we are implanting into each other.
And the grades type stuff is the reason WHY we do it.
And it is all going on in PT, which is why objectives and
OT drills work.
We are holding each other in the trap of a singular solidified
reality and compulsive agreement.
But as we work any of the above lines we begin to shake
things loose.
And as each of us begins to come up in awareness and loosen
our hold on others, it becomes easier for the remainder to
go free.
And of course, if you weren't doing it to others, they couldn't
do it to you successfully.
I've hardly scratched the surface of this. There is much
more work needed here, and as you all know, I'm quite
distracted right now.
But I wanted to get the basic idea out immediately.
My gut feeling is that this is the key that we needed to
make it to real OT.
Best,
The Pilot
==========================================
Interestingly, the guy I quote in my sig had a similar insight though I don't think he had the tech to handle it.