That was my question as well. I cannot see that any specific rule of their Terms and Conditions has been broken. The complaint appears to be based on the premise that someone’s privacy has been violated. I cannot understand this as the video was filmed in a public place. There is no expectation of privacy in this situation. If someone is concerned about a lack of privacy, then perhaps they shouldn’t go out to the homes of public Scientologists, asking them for money?
Anyway, I sent an Email off to YouTube support requesting clarification, but haven’t heard back yet.
Axiom142
That's easy.. OSA clearly expects to be able to 'load you up' with implant content in privacy... Look at this fiasco! - By filming him and putting the video on the intertubes, You made George load the intire WOG society up with implant content that was only meant for you!
You made the intire WOG society CRAZY!!
hmm.. I don't know why they're upset about that anyway.. Hubbard said that the intire human race was nuts back in 1950.. He explained that elaborately in the Dianetics book.. So what's new?
And besides.. Now Scientology has a known recent implanty that they can audit out of 'raw meat'.. Give a great win, like: "Hey! - I'm not razy anyway! -That was just some shit George Baillie said to Axiom! - There it was! - Right in my reactive mind, hidden under a mental ridge, making me think I was crazy! - I'm so happy I'm not crazy! - Lemm'e write a success story!!"
For a handsome fee! - Don't forget.. For a handsome fee! - Hell, you can make a living from that shit!