I looked up your references. Talking about
you and
your intentions/beliefs is off-topic. We are discussing
LRH's intentions.
You didn't respond to my specific questions (
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=293434&postcount=108). And more specifically regarding the relevance of Hubbard's intentions to the implimentation of Scn processes (such as TR8) that I outlined in my long post.
You still appear to be playing to the gallery rather than discussing specific points being discussed.
If Hubbard's intentions are
unimportant to you, why are you repeatedly posting on a thread about Hubbard's intentions? Doesn't this communicate that you
do think they are important?
Could you address the idea in my thread that Hubbard drilled us by proxy on TR8 to become effective enforcers of intention whilst simultaneously educating us to accept and carry through
his Command Intention. One intention though the indenders be many.
Even his definition of Tone 40 "intention without reservation or limit" uses the word Intention. (as if that has anything to do with serenity - but that is just Hubbard's mis-conception of spirituality!).
Given the above concept of Tone 40 combined with his
evil intentions in his Affirmations, do you still contend that Hubbard's intentions are unimportant?
It is my contention that for this reason Hubbard's intentions are absolutely crucial to a clear understanding of the purpose and action of Scn. We were drilled to enforce
his intention without reservation or limit, yet his apologists say his intentions are unknowable and irrelevant!
I agree. His Affrimations are our best evidence as to both his intentions and his problems pre-scientology.
One could dismiss them as old, no longer relevant when he created Scn, the rambling aspirations of a young man who later matured. etc.
Except that so much of Scn was still concerned with the topics addressed in his affirmations, such as control of men, control of entities, making money, being admired, controlling and predicting people's psychology, etc. etc.
And of course we also have the evidence of those who worked closely with him in the early development of Scn, who saw first-hand his intentions. (Sara Northrup, Nibs, Helen O'Brien, etc). Some of whom Hubbard apologists work hard to discredit. I can feel the fingers twitching even as my words are read. Twitching to post derisive reports about Nibs or Sara.