paul.spiritualquest
Patron with Honors
on the owl stuff
Are you seriously trying to suggest that the "Illuminati" have a cross-eyed owl as a symbol?
There is a long tradition of occult symbols having been used for centuries, with a very specific and concrete meaning to them, that occultists decipher not like you and me.
The use of the owl is documented in many places. It is ONE MORE of many symbols, like there is plenty of symbols in Scn.: The dianetics triangle, the double triangle with the S, the SO symbol, the Scn. cross, etc.. etc...
Symbology is not the same as semiotic, the study of signs, but a very own subject of it´s own.
INFERING by you that I mean that the symbol of the illuminati is the cross-eyed owl is illogical and has a purpose to demean:
1. There is not JUST one symbol to many of the groups or ideologies on Earth, take the communist, the nazis, the Italian fascist, the catholic church, the freemasons or scientologists, the gnostics, or whatever, there is not just one group using ONE symbol.
2. I never IMPLIED, that it was THE main Illuminati symbol, it is just one more symbol in the occult free-mason tradition, nothing more, nothing LESS.
3. I make my point again: It´s the only symbol, together with the RTC symbol surrounded by a fire, (another occult tradition) that was NOT defined by LRH or is not in any tech or admin dictionary with it´s meaning. It´s one of the most expensive facilities, created by the CoS, and it is kind of striking that out of all the symbology existing that one was picked. Besides, if in their inner logic, "OTs" are supposed to come back some day and recover the data, why use a symbol that NO Scientologist knows or can recognize? Didn´t that strike you somehow? I´m taking from their pre-supposed point of view, not stating that the OTs will come back in some distant future and find and use the titanium stuff.
What you are trying to INFER with your self-answering question (you are not expecting an answer to that, hence it is a rhetorical question) is that :
a. I´m somehow plain stupid or ingenious, or gullible.
b. you are mocking at me.
I get the flow, but I couldn´t care less...
What you are really DOING is:
a. swaying off-topic in order to diminish my arguments.
b. swaying off the attention from THE TOPIC to making a less important HOW things were sayed or posed, instead of WHAT was said
This is weak argumenting. Also done by hipnotical magicians, swaying off the attention from the thing to some other thing, in order for one´s weaknesses not be apreciated or noticed. Had enough of this, thought I would find more calmness, true listening, and more true argumenting here.
Are you seriously trying to suggest that the "Illuminati" have a cross-eyed owl as a symbol?
There is a long tradition of occult symbols having been used for centuries, with a very specific and concrete meaning to them, that occultists decipher not like you and me.
The use of the owl is documented in many places. It is ONE MORE of many symbols, like there is plenty of symbols in Scn.: The dianetics triangle, the double triangle with the S, the SO symbol, the Scn. cross, etc.. etc...
Symbology is not the same as semiotic, the study of signs, but a very own subject of it´s own.
INFERING by you that I mean that the symbol of the illuminati is the cross-eyed owl is illogical and has a purpose to demean:
1. There is not JUST one symbol to many of the groups or ideologies on Earth, take the communist, the nazis, the Italian fascist, the catholic church, the freemasons or scientologists, the gnostics, or whatever, there is not just one group using ONE symbol.
2. I never IMPLIED, that it was THE main Illuminati symbol, it is just one more symbol in the occult free-mason tradition, nothing more, nothing LESS.
3. I make my point again: It´s the only symbol, together with the RTC symbol surrounded by a fire, (another occult tradition) that was NOT defined by LRH or is not in any tech or admin dictionary with it´s meaning. It´s one of the most expensive facilities, created by the CoS, and it is kind of striking that out of all the symbology existing that one was picked. Besides, if in their inner logic, "OTs" are supposed to come back some day and recover the data, why use a symbol that NO Scientologist knows or can recognize? Didn´t that strike you somehow? I´m taking from their pre-supposed point of view, not stating that the OTs will come back in some distant future and find and use the titanium stuff.
What you are trying to INFER with your self-answering question (you are not expecting an answer to that, hence it is a rhetorical question) is that :
a. I´m somehow plain stupid or ingenious, or gullible.
b. you are mocking at me.
I get the flow, but I couldn´t care less...
What you are really DOING is:
a. swaying off-topic in order to diminish my arguments.
b. swaying off the attention from THE TOPIC to making a less important HOW things were sayed or posed, instead of WHAT was said
This is weak argumenting. Also done by hipnotical magicians, swaying off the attention from the thing to some other thing, in order for one´s weaknesses not be apreciated or noticed. Had enough of this, thought I would find more calmness, true listening, and more true argumenting here.