I am sure there are hours of interviews. They have to be edited to put together a show. So maybe afterwards, all of the interviews may be available online after the last interview. Maybe a lot of the questions you all have in this thread are covered.
----
Didnt exwife Rinder say she never saw a scratch on him? Didn't Tommy earlier state that it was not DM who was doing the hitting on Rinder, it was Rathbun hitting Rinder? So how can exwife say she never saw any marks?
One of the LRH definitions of PR is "Effective Cause, Well Demonstrated".
Dissimulation and denial is pretty far from "effective cause".
Rene, just like your old days as a philosopher and mathematican in the 17th century, you have made some excellent points.
#1 Lying begets more lying to cover your inconcsistancies.
#2 C of S should just call their disaffected execs liars. When they go further and get specific, such as saying Rathbun beat Rinder, these lies create inconsistencies and contradictions which require further lying.
#3 In a system built on lies, the liar will eventually box himself into a corner where nothing is consistent or makes sense.
FORTUNATE FOR THE LIARS - Not everyone in the public has a mathematical mind like the great Rene Descartes and can see the obvious. The average viewer of CNN probably does not notice the inconsistencies and does not "connect the dots." If things go to court, then the attornies are supposed to be the one's who focus the spotlight on these contradictions.
A FURTHER POINT WHICH NO ONE SEEMS TO HAVE COMMENTED ON - SORT OF A DROPPED OUT TIME KIND OF OUTPOINT.
These ex execs have been top level management in C of S for the long term, 20 to 35 years. By admitting this as well as accusing these execs of continous and heinous crimes, C of S is painting itself into a box and is firing a lot of "foot bullets" in the process.
If someone has held a top level executive post in an Organization for 20 to 35 years and that Organization is now asserting the person is a habitual liar and criminal, then there only one of three outcomes is possible. First, the person was basically truthfull and competent and was forced to lie and perform criminal acts by the Organization, second, the person was a liar and criminal the entire time and went undetected by the Organization and third, the Organization is now lying. All three possible outcomes reflect very poorly on the church and make them look like idiots.
Lakey
It doesn't look like Anderson is doing any serious research, but just poorly
copying the the St. Pete Times.
There is SO much on the net for the taking including right here on ESMB.
He should at least look at the text of TR-L that is used to practice lying.
As I said yesterday, still an impotent job, steered largely by fear of lawyers.
I'm sure no new ground will be broken. I hope I'm wrong.
It doesn't look like Anderson is doing any serious research, but just poorly
copying the the St. Pete Times. There is SO much on the net for the taking including right here on ESMB...
I'm sure no new ground will be broken. I hope I'm wrong.
The point here is not so much "new data" but EXPOSURE.
CNN and AC360 reach MILLIONS.
The point here is not so much "new data" but EXPOSURE.
CNN and AC360 reach MILLIONS.
ESMB, WWP, XenuNet, etc - thousands.
This is several orders of magnitude higher in terms of EXPOSURE.
(I *knew* that Planetary Dissem course would come in handy one day... )
I think we would complain whatever the content, as it is unlikely to be what we — as insiders — would consider cutting edge. Still, look at it. The subject matter is DM beating up his staff, and violence generally at Int Management. Whatever is said about it, that is still the subject matter being aired *internationally* on a well-respected channel and program.
I think that's pretty damn good.
Paul
I agree Paul. I even like AC's reporting style. It's like he's watching a tennis match. He sits back and lets the footbullets fly. Now I understand why Alanzo loves him. It doesn't look like he's attacking the cult at all, and yet it's clear that Scientologists are crazy as loons. Great reporting.
(I *knew* that Planetary Dissem course would come in handy one day... )
I've come to the conclusion that Tommy really isn't very bright. I must also admit to prejudice. I just don't like girly men. I don't mean gays - there are lots of handsome and masculine gay men, I just don't like the foppish thing.But Tommy "he'll never be the liar Rinder was" Davis was very funny too! I almost peed myself when he couldn't pronounce corroborate. "It wouldn't be a stretch of the imagination for them to get together and cowobowate their stories." Then as I was composing myself he said it AGAIN! Oh my as much as I enjoy the M&M show, I have to admit Tommy Davis is the funniest cast member in this show. I wish AC would ask him if he thinks he'll ever be as good a spokesperson as Rinder was for the Scam Cult of Scientology, or if he ever apprenticed under Heber.
I agree Paul. I even like AC's reporting style. It's like he's watching a tennis match. He sits back and lets the footbullets fly. Now I understand why Alanzo loves him. It doesn't look like he's attacking the cult at all, and yet it's clear that Scientologists are crazy as loons. Great reporting.