Jesse Prince
Patron
Reconnection
As I sat and watched the Anderson Copper series “Scientology: A History of Violence” I thought that one of the more poignant segments involved the ex spouse’s of Marty Rathbun and Mike Rinder, plus the crown jewel Monique Yingling. These fine ladies were doing their best to debunk the concept of forced disconnection as practiced in Scientology. Anyone who has ever spent at least 6 months in Scientology knows the fact that very early in all Scientology doctrine, the fledgling Scientologist is prepared and taught how to reject and disconnect from individuals, family, friends or even institutions deemed “undesirable, or low toned”. New Scientologist are instructed on how to negotiate with friends and family deemed a potential threat by telling lies. For most people in general there are moral implications associated with the act of lying itself. Scientology doctrine trains the new Scientologist to lie, but calls the act “Telling an acceptable truth”, thus sidestepping any moral hazard associated with the act of lying. As all new Scientologist progress up the ladder to ... they become more sensitive to family, friends and people in general that may become antagonistic by questioning the authority of Scientology. Scientology doctrine trains its members to systematically lie over time to the potential threat. The logic being to tell continuous lies to the potential threatening person for the greater good of keeping the peace for now.
Masking the truth and telling lies (acceptable truths) is institutionalized in Scientology and starts at the very beginning of the indoctrination. The primary emphasis is to “protect” Scientology against any type of scrutiny what-so-ever in part by lying or masking the real truth. The Sea Org members take the concept of lying to a higher level and no longer need the crutch of telling acceptable truths. Sea Org members in general will outrageously lie with a straight face and conviction in their eyes.
The practice of institutionalized lying and deception is not a concept lonely to Scientology. Our United States military, along with any other military on the earth we live on trains’ new soldiers very early on how to lie and deceive in case of capture. They also learn how to deceive and attack targeted enemies. The adept soldier learns how to effectively communicate with his enemy while giving his enemy the least amount of information possible thru deception or outright lies. As an adept soldier moves up the ladder of privileged information and activity they become more proficient through training in the practices of deception.
Government Military’s around the world practice deception as a means to protect a nation or to undermine and/or conquer another or other nations and entities labelled as enemies of the state.
Again I apologize for the long preamble. The point I am trying to establish is this. Any Sea Org member who has left the movement readily admits to lying in the misguided effort to protect Scientology from scrutiny and/or to protect their place in the movement itself.
So what is Monique Yingling’s excuse? Here is an excellent example of a professional doing a professional job. What’s her profession, deception and lies. She is not motivated by an allegiance to the Scientology Doctrine, she is not a Scientologist. The fact of the matter is the only difference between Monique Yingling and her fellow Sea Org handlers is she is a paid for liar and deceiver the others are not paid.
Haggis also said he was “shocked” that the Church of Scientology was publicly denying that it adheres to a policy of disconnection — of severing ties with a friend or family member who’s antagonistic toward Scientology. Haggis said that his wife, Deborah Rennard, was given precisely those orders and didn’t speak to her parents for more than a year. – Paul Haggis
In the mist of all of this denial of Scientology’s disconnection policy as a final gesture, when a person decides to leave the Sea Org Movement, two things happen. They are either summarily declared a suppressive person which means they have forfeited the opportunity for Scientology’s brand of spiritual enlightenment and they are denied any connection to others who remain true to the movement. The other choice is to pay in access of $100,000.00 for the pleasure of being underpaid and working like a slave for the movement. Paying the cash is the first step to continue on the quest for Scientology’s brand of spiritual enlightenment. The other required steps are even more humiliating. My personal chosen path when I left was to leave the movement without any promise of payment from me to the Sea Org for anything past, present or future. I willingly and happily renounce any opportunity afforded me by my Sea Org handlers to continue my journey up their ladders or across any of their bridges. Given these circumstances, no Scientologist or Sea Org Member is allowed to associate with me in any way or on any level and I accepted my fate.
Today I am happy to say that I have more direct contact to and with Sea Org Members who were involved in the movement during my Scientology sojourn than I ever have.
I have also written my thoughts concerning the Sea Organization and I will post them soon.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jesse Prince
As I sat and watched the Anderson Copper series “Scientology: A History of Violence” I thought that one of the more poignant segments involved the ex spouse’s of Marty Rathbun and Mike Rinder, plus the crown jewel Monique Yingling. These fine ladies were doing their best to debunk the concept of forced disconnection as practiced in Scientology. Anyone who has ever spent at least 6 months in Scientology knows the fact that very early in all Scientology doctrine, the fledgling Scientologist is prepared and taught how to reject and disconnect from individuals, family, friends or even institutions deemed “undesirable, or low toned”. New Scientologist are instructed on how to negotiate with friends and family deemed a potential threat by telling lies. For most people in general there are moral implications associated with the act of lying itself. Scientology doctrine trains the new Scientologist to lie, but calls the act “Telling an acceptable truth”, thus sidestepping any moral hazard associated with the act of lying. As all new Scientologist progress up the ladder to ... they become more sensitive to family, friends and people in general that may become antagonistic by questioning the authority of Scientology. Scientology doctrine trains its members to systematically lie over time to the potential threat. The logic being to tell continuous lies to the potential threatening person for the greater good of keeping the peace for now.
Masking the truth and telling lies (acceptable truths) is institutionalized in Scientology and starts at the very beginning of the indoctrination. The primary emphasis is to “protect” Scientology against any type of scrutiny what-so-ever in part by lying or masking the real truth. The Sea Org members take the concept of lying to a higher level and no longer need the crutch of telling acceptable truths. Sea Org members in general will outrageously lie with a straight face and conviction in their eyes.
The practice of institutionalized lying and deception is not a concept lonely to Scientology. Our United States military, along with any other military on the earth we live on trains’ new soldiers very early on how to lie and deceive in case of capture. They also learn how to deceive and attack targeted enemies. The adept soldier learns how to effectively communicate with his enemy while giving his enemy the least amount of information possible thru deception or outright lies. As an adept soldier moves up the ladder of privileged information and activity they become more proficient through training in the practices of deception.
Government Military’s around the world practice deception as a means to protect a nation or to undermine and/or conquer another or other nations and entities labelled as enemies of the state.
Again I apologize for the long preamble. The point I am trying to establish is this. Any Sea Org member who has left the movement readily admits to lying in the misguided effort to protect Scientology from scrutiny and/or to protect their place in the movement itself.
So what is Monique Yingling’s excuse? Here is an excellent example of a professional doing a professional job. What’s her profession, deception and lies. She is not motivated by an allegiance to the Scientology Doctrine, she is not a Scientologist. The fact of the matter is the only difference between Monique Yingling and her fellow Sea Org handlers is she is a paid for liar and deceiver the others are not paid.
Haggis also said he was “shocked” that the Church of Scientology was publicly denying that it adheres to a policy of disconnection — of severing ties with a friend or family member who’s antagonistic toward Scientology. Haggis said that his wife, Deborah Rennard, was given precisely those orders and didn’t speak to her parents for more than a year. – Paul Haggis
In the mist of all of this denial of Scientology’s disconnection policy as a final gesture, when a person decides to leave the Sea Org Movement, two things happen. They are either summarily declared a suppressive person which means they have forfeited the opportunity for Scientology’s brand of spiritual enlightenment and they are denied any connection to others who remain true to the movement. The other choice is to pay in access of $100,000.00 for the pleasure of being underpaid and working like a slave for the movement. Paying the cash is the first step to continue on the quest for Scientology’s brand of spiritual enlightenment. The other required steps are even more humiliating. My personal chosen path when I left was to leave the movement without any promise of payment from me to the Sea Org for anything past, present or future. I willingly and happily renounce any opportunity afforded me by my Sea Org handlers to continue my journey up their ladders or across any of their bridges. Given these circumstances, no Scientologist or Sea Org Member is allowed to associate with me in any way or on any level and I accepted my fate.
Today I am happy to say that I have more direct contact to and with Sea Org Members who were involved in the movement during my Scientology sojourn than I ever have.
I have also written my thoughts concerning the Sea Organization and I will post them soon.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jesse Prince
Please continue your story 
