Well, I studied these deviants for years and probably am the one with more experience with them (non sexual). I agree with LRH about them. Though I would say most are HUGE beings that were royally fucked somewhere on the track. Quite a sad thing to be. Sure most of you will blast me. But noone here has spent as much time with them as me, I can bet my life on this. My best friend was a fag and I watched him pass away to AIDS. I studied a lot sub-cultures like the gay/electronic music/neo-drug scene years ago and there's little theta there. I have found gays to be either women with men's bodies, lazy men who find it easier to get sex from men and your screwed up person, either hormonally or because of some trauma/uncle/cousin.
Again these are my opinions based on my observation. I am not stating that this is true.
I'm not saying that all bigots have the same lapses in logic, but it sure seems like it.
"Well, I studied these deviants for years and probably am the one with more experience with them (non sexual)."
In what way did you study "them"?
How many did you "study", exactly?
"I agree with LRH about them."
LRH, obviously, had NO experience with gay people. Or, if he did, he sure wasn't informing his writing with that experience in Science of Survival where he called them 1.1, and said that adders make better friends.
LRH was simply pushing the buttons f the current society when he slurred his fellow men like this, for his own gain.
"Though I would say most are HUGE beings that were royally fucked somewhere on the track."
How did you come to this conclusion? Nothing you have said earlier would give any clue that this conclusion has anything supporting it at all.
"Quite a sad thing to be. Sure most of you will blast me. But no one here has spent as much time with them as me, I can bet my life on this. My best friend was a fag and I watched him pass away to AIDS."
Your best friend was a "fag"?
And you watched him pass away from AIDS?
Either you have no idea what it is to be a friend, or you are lying. Could be both. Or there is WAY more here than you are letting us know about yourself. Either he was not your best friend, and you are just saying that to puff yourself up and somehow make yourself an "authority", or you have absolutely no ability to understand others, and this person was unfortunate enough to be subjected to that in the last years of his life.
Or, he was much more than a friend to you, and seeing him die of AIDS scared the shit out of you and you decided that being gay would get you killed. And so you became anti-gay and a Scientologist.
If it's the former, then maybe you need to run "find the auditor" on others and realize that other people exist in this world you share with them. And once you realize that, you need to try and figure out how they exist different from you. And then you need to grant beingness to that difference. Otherwise, you are just going to continue to make yourself, and everyone around you, miserable.
If it's the latter, then I can understand you a lot better now.
"I studied a lot sub-cultures like the gay/electronic music/neo-drug scene years ago and there's little theta there."
"Studied"? Are you an Anthropologist in a Pith Helmut?
Or - are you running from something?
"I have found gays to be either women with men's bodies, lazy men who find it easier to get sex from men and your screwed up person, either hormonally or because of some trauma/uncle/cousin."
This is an observation that a disconnected idiot would make, with absolutely no sense of humanity, compassion, or understanding of any kind. Or, someone totally disconnected from himself.
I am hetero, and have been quite lazy in my life. And at NO TIME would I ever even think of getting sex from another man. It's because I'm not gay. I would only get sex from another man if other men turned me on sexually.
That you even consider this as a possibility, that a man would have sex with another man because he was "lazy", suggests that having sex with another man is a possibility for you, and that you are turned on by other men.
You would not be the first person that Scientology made hate themselves for being gay.
"Again these are my opinions based on my observation. I am not stating that this is true."
Why do you have them as your opinions, then, if you are not willing to state that they are true?
This is probably your one saving grace - you have a suspicion that you hold opinions that are not true.
Keep pulling the string there. Maybe it will lead to you having opinions that are closer to the truth.
Because, on the subject of gay people, you've got it totally wrong in this thread.
What you rub on is completely irrelevant to "the kind of person you are".
What you rub on is an automatic response.
And if Scientology made you wrong for that, you need to dump Scientology and grant beingness to
yourself, first, before you are going to be able to do it for anyone else.