So: four Scientologists attacked a peaceful protestor, broke his nose, gave him black eyes and so on. So far, so Scientology. Normally that particular piece of the tech is only put in on parishioners, not 'wogs' with friends with video cameras, etc.
But whatever. The event happened.
Some people posting in this thread have sought to justify actions of the first of the group of Scientologists who delivered a savage beating to clown. They've been very quiet about my question concerning the justification for three more Scientology cult members joining in what was already a one-sided "fight". Why did they feel the need to beat up a peaceful protester who wasn't fighting back?
But whatever. I guess that question has no easy answers, if you're an LRH apologist.
Funny thing is, any post in a topic like this can only bring closer the time when CofS ceases to exist.
If you post here, in an effort to defend Scientology, to deny that 'fair game' exists, to 'handle' ESMB, etc., you bump the thread. You also increase the overall body of evidence that exists. The indexing systems of the search engines get more data to trawl through, all the while discovering new phrases that link Miscavige, Scientology, violence, assault, LRH, arested... and so on.
In the eyes of the 'wog' world (Scientology's once-fertile recruiting ground), as in cyberspace, the associations between scientology and violence (and other unpalatable terms such as cult, scam, brainwash) become ever more thoroughly reinforced.
Please, present-day Scientology victims: keep on issuing those denials, and trying to obfuscate, in this and on all the other topics. You're doing a great job! Also, you're learning a great deal in the process. You're going to make great SP's. In fact, you already are.