Mark A. Baker
Sponsor
I was just correcting my post when I saw this. My post should read "1st and 2nd generation" and not "2nd and 3rd".
I apologize for my error.
Face:confused2:
No worries. So Pierre is then 3rd generation.
Mark A. Baker
I was just correcting my post when I saw this. My post should read "1st and 2nd generation" and not "2nd and 3rd".
I apologize for my error.
Face:confused2:
Ekaterina has just sent an apology to Emma, CCed to me.
No ex Scientologist worth his salt would read this haters' group of entheta. They can trust Pierre because he was trained by Ron, and is a Class Xll, something thee and me, can only grovel in front of.
In other words, they (potential PCs) will never hear a peep about this. Pierre and Mrs. have been doing this stuff for years. It is ignored (not is-ed) by respectable Freezone terminals like the IFA (International Freezone Assn.) group on yahoo.
Pierre is a kha khan. We are just riff raff. Who would you trust?
... Terril has been known to be a liar and a half...
I don't agree with this characterization. There is much that Terril fails to comprehend. He also has a penchant for passing on gossip. And he is often reckless in his attempts to 'resolve' other people's problems. But, although he may often make or repeat statements which are factually incorrect or deceptive, I consider that is due to his tendency to respond rashly due to his emotional investment and his own failure to understand the matters he is choosing to discuss. I doubt that he knowingly & deliberately lies. Certainly not often.
Mark A. Baker
I don't agree with this characterization. There is much that Terril fails to comprehend. He also has a penchant for passing on gossip. And he is often reckless in his attempts to 'resolve' other people's problems. But, although he may often make or repeat statements which are factually incorrect or deceptive, I consider that is due to his tendency to respond rashly due to his emotional investment and his own failure to understand the matters he is choosing to discuss. I doubt that he knowingly & deliberately lies. Certainly not often.
Mark A. Baker
She has not apologized to me...
And she has not apologized in public...same as her insults in public...
So it does NOT count...
How do we know it is true? Terril has been known to be a liar and a half...he'll say anything he wants or if he thinks it fits...it would not be the first time, nor the last...besides...he is always tryin to ingratiate himself with the Ethiers.
Diana
I don't agree with this characterization. There is much that Terril fails to comprehend.
He also has a penchant for passing on gossip.
And he is often reckless in his attempts to 'resolve' other people's problems.
But, although he may often make or repeat statements which are factually incorrect or deceptive,
I consider that is due to his tendency to respond rashly due to his emotional investment and
his own failure to understand the matters he is choosing to discuss.
I doubt that he knowingly & deliberately lies. Certainly not often.
Mark A. Baker
Full def of damning with faint praise!
Welcome to the Freezone Wars, Take 15
You would prefer the characterization of you as a 'liar' to remain unquestioned & unchallenged?
Mark A. Baker
Characterization as a "liar" defended with other characterizations which are just as bad or worse, and the "liar" defense added to and strengthened.
My head did a little spin on wondering if you are remotely seriously trying to defend, or expect anyone else to believe you are. I don't get it. You are not dumb, I know that, but do you think Terril is too dumb to notice, or too stupid to tell you to FO?
I think Carmelo should post another Abbot and Costello on this thread, just as he did with such brilliant timing on the thread about the Ethiers.
Characterization as a "liar" defended with other characterizations which are just as bad or worse, and the "liar" defense added to and strengthened.
My head did a little spin on wondering if you are remotely seriously trying to defend, or expect anyone else to believe you are. I don't get it. You are not dumb, I know that, but do you think Terril is too dumb to notice, or too stupid to tell you to FO?
I think Carmelo should post another Abbot and Costello on this thread, just as he did with such brilliant timing on the thread about the Ethiers.
She has not apologized to me...
And she has not apologized in public...same as her insults in public...
So it does NOT count... (snip)
Diana
......snip......
How do we know it is true? Terril has been known to be a liar and a half...he'll say anything he wants or if he thinks it fits...it would not be the first time, nor the last...besides...he is always tryin to ingratiate himself with the Ethiers.
Diana
LOL! Are you defending him or..? LOL!!!!
If Terril would only stop drinking so much perhaps he'd be a better person...
Diana
Characterization as a "liar" defended with other characterizations which are just as bad or worse, and the "liar" defense added to and strengthened.
My head did a little spin on wondering if you are remotely seriously trying to defend, or expect anyone else to believe you are. I don't get it. You are not dumb, I know that, but do you think Terril is too dumb to notice, or too stupid to tell you to FO?
I think Carmelo should post another Abbot and Costello on this thread, just as he did with such brilliant timing on the thread about the Ethiers.
In the Pierre Eithier thread, I respond to Terrill regarding his conversation on what Mrs Pierre wants.
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=560567&postcount=137
Was this necessary? If I were a scientologist, I would say that you are speaking in generalities.
Could you other please post the links to your statement substanciating his being a liar?
Diana,
was that necessary, as well?
Do you actually think that by being vindictive, you are going to accomplish something useful or effective? I like you. Stop lowering your self to this games condition behavior again. We have enough of it with you and the Oracle.