Maybe you're missing 'mass' on it
Howz bout an example?
A guy is hypnotized that 'you're a chicken'. He now actually believes it. But, all the hypnotist said was 'you're a chicken', not *how* he became a chicken, or *why* he doesn't look like a chicken or how it is he can talk to people, despite the fact that chickens notoriously don't talk.
So, when asked how he turned into a chicken, he has to come up with his *own* 'whole track' for it. 'Well, actually, I was always a chicken, but, I didn't want anyone to notice, and, now I'm 'out of the coop''.
Or, Why does he talk instead of clucking? 'Most chickens could talk, but, they choose not to, because they're still stuck 'in the coop''.
Or, why he doesn't have feathers? 'About 75 million years ago I was blown up in a volcano using hydrogen bombs and it blew my feathers off''.
See? The trick is that all the 'hypnotist' did was suggest that the 'subject' was a chicken; the rest is what he comes up with to *rationalize* his belief.
The subject has a 'stable datum' around which all his rationalizations are built.
It's one reason I suspect that Ron forbade 'discussing case' or 'the Tech' with others, and even condemned it as 'Verbal Tech' and a crime.
When all the chickens begin clucking their whole tracks together, it could get confusing
Zinj