What's new

Mark 'Marty' Rathbun: Scientology Top Management (video of Marty being ambushed)

. . .
Jenny circa 1998
before "the crazy"
fully took hold.


View attachment 8412
It's a 21-year incubation period for
symptoms to manifest usually . . .
or so I've been told. :wink2:



:hysterical:

That archive photo catches Jenny in a rather pensive, pre-Sea Org moment; while she was contemplating her future--using Ron's Doubt Formula:



attachment.php


JENNY
(thinking deep thoughts, to herself)
Let's see, which is the greatest good?
Flipping burgers and losing my eternity?
Or, globe trotting and shattering SPs
wherever they might try to hide, like
airports and some junk or whatever.

 
...

Why do cult members say things that are so morbidly paradoxical?


JENNY LINSON (to Marty Rathbun): "Nobody gives a fuck about you!"


Don't those 6 words just fully capture the plight & pathos of Jenny and every single other Sea Org member enslaved to a sociopathic cult leader?
 
Mike Rinder provides background information.

Scientology Top Management Video Earlier Beginning
http://www.mikerindersblog.org/scientology-top-management-video-earlier-beginning/

Excerpt:
Given the enormous interest in the video posted on Marty Rathbun’s blog, I am reprinting an article that he published on October 13, 2010 on Moving On Up A Little Higher .

It features Jenny Linson and Dave Bloomberg (along with a number of others), carrying out an earlier, but very similar version of their LAX attack on Mark Rathbun. (My added comments are italicized in red)

Miscavige Meltdown – the Proof
 
The South African Independent Scientology blog Scientologists getting back in comm weighs in.

Marty ambushed yet again by RCS & how this relates to South African SCN’s
http://backincomm.wordpress.com/201...y-rcs-how-this-relates-to-south-african-scns/

* * * * * BEGIN QUOTATION * * * * *

On Monday (20 Oct 2014) a story broke about Marty being ambushed and harassed by a trio of RCS execs who “just happened” to be in the same place at LAX (Los Angeles Airport). Marty videoed the whole incident.

The three Church execs involved in this humiliating public display of what “top SCN Management” behave like in public were:

1. Jenny Linson. Personal friend of DM & former wife of Tom De Vocht who was one of many ex-SO members that revealed the many physical beatings perpetrated by DM on top execs in the Church. Jenny and other wives of those who made similar allegations appeared on Anderson Cooper’s CNN show and tried rather unsuccessfully to dead-agent these claims. Jenny swore that she knew “every inch” of Tom and never saw a bruise on his body. This resulted in the interview thereafter being coined as “the inch wives” (and thus explains the above pic).

2. Dave Bloomberg. Long serving SO Exec in the highest strata of Church Management.

3. Marc Yager. Highest ecclesiastical officer of Scientology’s ‘mother church’ (church of scientology international). Watchdog Committee Chairman. South Africans will be familiar with Marc as he often appeared in event videos (and then disappeared years ago, believed to have been living in “the hole” ever since).

Jeffrey Augustine posted an article about this incident and kindly gave us permission to re-post it here on BIC.

The reason we found Jeff’s article to be of particular significance is that he raises the issue of possible laws that were broken.

What many South African SCN’s don’t know is that whereas the Church can and does hide behind 1st Amendment Rights in the USA, no such “rights” exist in South Africa and the Church, just as every other organisation or individual in this country, falls under the same Constitutional Law and Bill of Rights.

Therefore, if the Church in this country harasses anyone such as they have been doing, they are in effect committing a crime. (Enforced disconnections, telling people to “unfriend” others on facebook or to disconnect from “so and so”, threatening people if they don’t cooperate by offering up names of UTR friends, requesting people to “come see HCO about some concerns we have”, summoning people to a comm-ev or “ethics interview” on trumped-up charges, confronting a person about “reports” received but not shown, asking any personal questions that the person does not feel comfortable answering, accusing any person of having missed W/H’s or being “out ethics”, publishing or making libelous/slanderous articles or statements about other SCN’s. And so on.

All of this constitutes harassment and discrimination which are criminal acts punishable by the law in this country. One does not even need an attorney to lodge such a case – you can simply go to the court (or police station), fill out the documents and lodge the case – and the matter is then investigated. If proven to be true (which is very easy to prove as the Church is so arrogantly and blatantly overt with their “above the law” attitude) then punitive damages may be awarded to the person lodging the complaint.


With that in mind, here is Jeffrey’s article followed by the video of what occurred.

Did the Church of Scientology Violate the Law

When It Harrassed Marty Rathbun at LAX?

It was completely reprehensible, outrageous, and irresponsible for the three Scientology officials to have entered a US airport for the purposes of harassing one individual.

One would think the Church of Scientology would have the common sense and decency to not risk disrupting airport operations in order to act as agents provocateur for David Miscavige.

A single event can shut down an entire airport, delay flights, and cause psychological distress for passengers.
Why the Church chose to engage in such preposterous behavior at a high-security US airport raises serious concerns that should be investigated by law enforcement.

The three Scientology officials may have broken several laws by harassing Mr. Rathbun inside a US airport:

The Scientology executives are members of a tax-exempt 501(c)3 group, and, they acted in concert in what certainly appears to be a staged operation deliberately designed to create or provoke an adverse incident at a major high-security US airport

The US Supreme Court long ago ruled that, “An airport terminal operated by a public authority is a non-public forum.” In other words, the Church of Scientology agents were not in a public forum. This may prove to be an important distinction.

US airports are multi-jurisdictional non-public forums. Due to the multi-jurisdictional nature of LAX, the Scientology officials have left themselves open to investigation by many different agencies. Moreover, numerous interior and exterior LAX surveillance cameras filmed the Scientology agents.

LAX serves about 220,000 passengers a day. Why did the Church of Scientology choose to risk disrupting passengers and various law enforcement agencies at LAX?

Law enforcement is at LAX to protect the public; an airport is no place for the Church of Scientology to carry on a vendetta.

Were tax-exempt dollars spent? If so, were laws broken during this potentially illegal expenditure of tax-exempt monies?

Who inside of Scientology ordered this action?

These may prove to be questions that law enforcement will investigate.

This event was another incredibly ill-advised misadventure on the part of the Church of Scientology and David Miscavige.

This writer salutes Marty Rathbun for his calm demeanor and composure in dealing with angry cult members at LAX.

EDIT: Our sources tell us the following:

1. Jenny Linson, Dave Bloomberg, and Marc Yager have replaced the post of WDC OSA Legal previously held by Mike Rinder. They operate from the building that was previously CMO Gold.

2. The LAX incident was “striking an effective blow” in order for the SP Hole Legal “Troika” to get out of a lower condition. If so, this is proof of the insanity in which the upper management of the Church is engulfed.


“Troika” is from the Russian ?????? and refers to a triumvirate or a group of three. In the Stalinist Era in Russia, the notorious NKVD troika conducted show trials (kangaroo courts) and imprisoned or executed those deemed enemies of Stalin.

Jeffrey Augustine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EG70fhg0wL4

If you would like to read the article Marty personally wrote about his experience, you can do so by clicking here

* * * * * END QUOTATION * * * * *
 
...
Just started looking at some of the comments on YouTube for the Airport Attack video.

Does it mean I am an SP if I had a huge win on this comment?


Evil Len 10 hours ago

I really really really really really want to hit that woman in the mouth with a crowbar.
 
...
Just started looking at some of the comments on YouTube for the Airport Attack video.

Does it mean I am an SP if I had a huge win on this comment?

Am I evil that I like the one immediately following that asks, "but why not a sledgehammer?" :ohmy:
 
...

For quite a while, I have been wondering why Scientology has not recently engaged in a major cult meltdown that was caught on video and posted in blazing footbullet colors across the worldwide web.

So, Scientologists, I really want to know--why has it been so quiet all these months until the airport attack against Marty that you just did? Why the lapse before this epic PR screwup? Why the com lag? What have you been doing?


Originally Posted by Jenny Linson

We had to drill it to a pass first.
 
..
485,350 hits and counting.....close to half a million...:p

Yayyy!

Wait! Is that actually good news or bad news?

Doesn't a half-million people attacking/mocking Scientology mean that they are expanding and winning?




(Apologies to anyone who never was a scientologist, for whom that last sentence will make absolutely no sense whatsoever)
 
A couple of hours to the half million (?)

I did look up the definition of a viral video and the only quoted source I found (whatever that means) is 5 million views in the first 3-5 days
 
..


Yayyy!

Wait! Is that actually good news or bad news?

Doesn't a half-million people attacking/mocking Scientology mean that they are expanding and winning?




(Apologies to anyone who never was a scientologist, for whom that last sentence will make absolutely no sense whatsoever)

Such ATTACKS mean Scientology is winning ! SPs only attack when stats are out the roof !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5hmPwWldio
 
I really think this whole debacle, once again, was allowed to manifest due simply to massive hubris and that's all.

Even with all the past errors in judgement, Miscavige STILL does not understand these things:

The Internet
The Streisand Effect
Other People

When he dreams up his fair game programs, he does it in a vacuum surrounded by sycophants (including the knowledge that he has, what he considers, big-wigs like Tom Cruise on his side).

So, in his arrogance and condescending view of wogs and the media, he completely discounts their potential interaction in his "private" plans. Because he gives no credence to other people. To consider what others might do in response to his actions would be to admit that others exist and have power. That is unacceptable. So, instead, he and most all the cult members continue to behave in the same psychotic way while expecting different results, every single time, from what they usually get because Ron told them they should or some crap.
 
Last edited:

Such ATTACKS mean Scientology is winning !
SPs only attack when stats are out the roof !


Loved that video!

So, let's review. . .


Attacks against Scientology mean that...
Scientology is winning


But, attacks against Scientologists mean that...
They are PTS and need to buy auditing
 
Top