I'm so glad you answered me, Alex.
Thanks.
The following standard ethics and tech points of Scientology have the intentions and activities, and the goals, of directly destroying the right to the freedom of speech.
From the Ethics Book, pages 279-307:
TESTIFYING OR GIVING DATA AGAINST SCIENTOLOGY FALSELY OR IN GENERALITIES OR WITHOUT PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE MATTERS TO WHICH ONE TESTIFIES
FALSELY ATTRIBUTING OR FALSELY REPRESENTING ONESELF OT OTHERS AS SOURCE OF SCIENTOLOGY OR DIANETICS TECHNOLOGY; OR USING ANY POSITION GAINED WITH STAFF/OR PUBLIC TO FALSELY ATTRIBUTE NONSOURCE MATERIAL TO SOURCE OR TO FALSELY REPRESENT NON-SOURCE MATERIAL AS AUTHORIZED SCIENTOLOGY OR DIANETICS TECHNOLOGY
KNOWINGLY GIVING TESTIMONY WHICH IS FALSE, A GENERALITY OR NOT BASED ON PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE TO IMPERIL A SCIENTOLOGIST.
PUBLIC DISAVOWAL OF SCIENTOLOGY OR SCIENTOLOGISTS IN GOOD STANDING WITH SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS
PUBLIC STATEMENTS AGAINST SCIENTOLOGY OR SCIENTOLOGISTS BUT NOT TO COMMITTEE OF EVIDENCES DULY CONVENED
PROPOSING ADVISING OR VOTING FOR LEGISLATION OR ORDINANCES, RULES OR LAWS DIRECTED TOWARD THE SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY
PRONOUNCING SCIENTOLOGISTS GUILTY OF THE PRACTICE OF STANDARD SCIENTOLOGY
TESTIFYING HOSTILELY BEFORE STATE OR PUBLIC INQUIRIES INTO SCIENTOLOGY TO SUPPRESS IT.
REPORTING OR THREATENING TO REPORT SCIENTOLOGY OR SCIENTOLOGISTS TO CIVIL AUTHORITIES IN AN EFFORT TO SUPPRESS SCIENTOLOGY OR SCIENTOLOGISTS FROM PRACTICING OR RECEIVING STANDARD SCIENTOLOGY
WRITING ANTI-SCIENTOLOGY LETTERS TO THE PRESS OR GIVING ANTI-SCIENTOLOGY OR ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST DATA TO THE PRESS
ENGAGING IN MALICIOUS RUMOR-MONGERING TO DESTROY THE AUTHORITY OR REPUTE OF HIGHER OFFICERS OR THE LEADING NAMES OF SCIENTOLOGY OR TO "SAFEGUARD" A POSITION
SPREADING FALSE TALES TO INVALIDATE CLEARS OR SPREADING LIBELOUS AND SLANDEROUS STATEMENTS ABOUT THE ALLEGED BEHAVIOR OF CLEARS
IT IS A HIGH CRIME TO PUBLICLY DEPART SCIENTOLOGY
Each of the above, which are most definitely part of the standard ethics and justice technology of Scientology, and which are used to suppress the freedom of speech of the individuals unlucky enough to be under an area which the Church controls, ALL ARE DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY - AS THEIR GOALS - to destroy the right to the freedom of speech.
So if you are for the right to the freedom of speech, then how can you still call yourself a Scientologist - unless you are a complete retard?
(Note* Being a complete retard is not the only choice I am offering you, Alex. You can be anything other than a complete retard, as long as you can answer the question in a way that makes sense, and which shows you are not a complete retard.)