ESMB has entered archive mode. All posts and threads that were available to the general public are still readable. The board is still searchable. 

Thank you all for your participation and readership over the last 12 years.

If you want to join in the conversation, please join the new ESMB Redux at

Academic Paper: Narconon, Scientology, and the Battle for Legitimacy, by Prof. Stephen Kent

Discussion in 'Narconon, Drug Free World, and Other Anti-drug Fro' started by CommunicatorIC, Nov 11, 2017.

  1. CommunicatorIC

    CommunicatorIC @IndieScieNews on Twitter

    Academic Paper: Narconon, Scientology, and the Battle for Legitimacy, by Prof. Stephen Kent.

    Marbrug Journal of Relgion: Narconon, Scientology, and the Battle for Legitimacy, by Prof. Stephen Kent

    * * * * * BEGIN ABSTRACT * * * * *

    By Stephen A. Kent


    This article provides an historical description and analysis of Scientology’s controversial drug treatment program, Narconon. Following scholarship by sociologist Terra Manca on Scientology’s pseudo-medicine, I argue that Scientology initially wavered about acknowledging its program to be part of its ‘religion,’ but eventually dropped this claim as it attempted to get Narconon programs and teachings established in communities. I show, however, the intimate association between Scientology and Narconon courses, and present some of the evidence that the program lacks scientific validity - especially its Purification Rundown.

    * * * * * END ABSTRACT * * * * *


    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which provides:

    You are free to:

    Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format​

    Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material​

    The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.​

    Under the following terms:

    Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.​

    NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.​

    ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.​

    No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.​


    You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.​

    No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.​

    Last edited: Nov 12, 2017
  2. Tilly

    Tilly Patron

    The article was long and I didn't feel like reading the whole thing but wasn't surprised that:

    Quote: "Narconon program used Scientology material that was not intended or designed for drug treatment.".........the State Department of Corrections canceled a $35,000 contract with NARCONON, a group that was doing drug abuse work with prisoners. State officials, calling the
    group’s program a ‘con,’ said it was really a recruiting effort for Scientology and had dubious success rates."..........During the early years of Narconon’s operations, and while Scientology was gaining control over the program, Hubbard clarified his position about what appropriate ethics were for Scientology members and the organizations they ran.In June 1968, Hubbard published one of several definitions of Scientology ethics, which ma
    de the elimination of counter-Scientology programs and positions an imperative for members, at the same time requiring them to eliminate
    all programs that were indifferent to or not involved with spreading his influence.UNQUOTE