I am just shooting the shit too. You just don't know me.
.
Fair enough.
I am just shooting the shit too. You just don't know me.
.
Alan wrote:
Ad hominem attack on the questioner.
No answer to the questions asked.
Sound familiar anyone?
Suggest you read this!
http://suddendebt.blogspot.com/2007/08/complete-evaporation-of-liquidity.html
In other words, all the rich guys in the world are now broke?
Alan
The reason I am reluctant to answer questions on this thread about Knowledgism is it acts as a form of proselyting.
There is only one person on ESMB that I would really like to be part of what I do.
So I really hit the nail on the head with this artificial identity of "Knowledgist", with all its goals of "Total Riches", and it's moral codes, and everything else.
See, I did enough of the BC, too, to figure this out.
But I was not going to go around and dramatize on others what LRH did to me.
You even have a kind of Bridge to Total Riches. And books that promote the services. Even your own Saint Hill out there in the middle of Texas.
You know exactly what you are doing, don't you, Alan?
I do, too.
I went back to Tampa Org in 2005-06 to learn all about Scientology ethics so I could steer my way through it. Early 2006 I was finally successful in getting attention of LRH Comm FSO to get a Board of Review called. In the first meeting it was clear how Flag terminals had goofed up. But to this day I have not received the findings of that B of R.
To me this was a test of how Ethics and Justice is being followed at Flag. I found it to be sadly wanting. If ethics (rationality) is out, then tech and admin would obviously be misinterpreted and it would be out too.
.
Vinaire,
I remember you from the FSO in 1978. I live in the Tampa Bay area as well.
How would I contact you?
Smitty
Did you examine those three safeguards that I mentioned?
.
Maybe you should go down there and investigate it and give a full report. Observation missions are still in useful, huh?
I doubt if Alan would let me in the front gate.
However, you, Bea.
I think he has a contract for you to sign.
Huh? what are you talking about?![]()
I don't see why not (he wouldn't let you in the front door) although, I kind of assume you wouldn't go around buttonholing the paying customers. You could interrogate the rattlesnakes instead
Zinj
What's "buttonholing"?
I like the sound of that.
Earlier in this thread, Alan says that there is only one person on this board that he would like to work with.
I am guessing that is you, because of your training and case levels, and proximity.
I might be wrong.
Perish the thought.
Proximity? I dont think so. I am not in Texas.
So, its just a guess then? hmmmmm......