Alanzo Apologism 101: Does Anti-Scientology Deserve Any Criticism?

Yes I had heard that from others, but everyone was too scared to say because of backlash. And I was too scared to "criticise" or call it out.

 

I never would have known Karen#1 was such a large donor to ESMB...........except she made a point of bringing it to our attention every year

 

So when Emma lied about me being the biggest donor ever to ESMB, everyone here knew it was a lie?

And no one said anything?

 

I don't think "everyone knew". I knew.

I'm off to bed so "come at me beatch!". I'll answer you tomorrow.

 

I must have missed it, I don't remember her saying that.

 

What do you suggest Alan?

 

five days is a long time but it isn't weeks

I'm in touch with The Olde Towne Team; we be defending champs until we got nothin' to defend but we be also tailoring our hit man for The Evil Empire...

 

You read my book yet?

"The Amendment, Revised, Corrected and Refined", William Birdwood, Amazon $6.00

 

Straight from the Megalurch Unlimited own bullshit tanks

 

You are saying, perhaps, there is a... ahem... "politically correct" way to be an ex-scientologist?


Always with the finest bullshit, Megalurch Unlimited takes special pride in it's industrial strength Politically Correct Bullshit custom concocted to any form outside of The Way Thins Are

 

Evidence?

 

I'm not sure where you got this figure of 5 days.

Multiple witnesses said some children were in their for weeks. Here's a quote from one of them:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf/miller/interviews/mayo.htm

The length of time for children would vary, but no one was there less than a day. The average was a week or two. Three weeks was about the maximum. Age didn't matter. The youngest kids were 5, 6 or 7. Old, young, men, women, big, little; it wouldn't matter because to Scientologists the being is ageless so you don't think in terms of how young or old someone is.
Interview with David Mayo, Palo Alto, California, 28 August 1986

 

thanx for the link pitsy

i'd never seen this mayo material

 

I did quote from some of it in the past, but now you got the whole thing.

 

It's one thing defending someones reputation and it is another to refute evidence given due to allegiance

 

I've also linked to it in response to at least one of your posts, CP. If you didn't see it before it's 'cause you didn't follow the link. You're supposed to click on these things, you know.

Here's a post where I linked to it.
http://www.forum.exscn.net/threads/trs-and-the-ganzfeld-effect.42491/page-13#post-1169776

 

I think it is more like the neurosis and phobias, installed through association and participation in scientology, need to be overcome and then the members would be willing to confront the egregious psychopathic tryrant. This really is not a religious issue it is a mental health issue on both sides.

 

You might like to read George K Simon Jr.'s book "How did we end up here" and its companion "Character Disturbances" .....oh crap....I just realized I still have 3 untouched books on kindle WTF am I doing here.?

 

Well I have to admit I have not done so much laughing since a long time while reading on ESMB as I have reading your comments Al... .thanks, I needed some good chuckles away from the more serious reading I have been doing.

 

That link is to just a small portion and yes, I did read that link then...

I got my ears on and my eyes open.

But the total on darkside is still far short of the total on light side; you got anything on dark side to match the EST my father got on papers signed by my BITCH stepmother at the Carrier "Clinic" three years before he died at 53? Much less the tens of thousands with dime store ice picks jammed into their frontal lobes?

mais j'ecousiant...