CS, there are plenty of things people don't like to experience. Pain, stress, conflict, emotional upsets.
I don't doubt for a minute that your stomach ache was resolved.
Its one of my supernatural abilities.
The thing is, just about any garden-variety method from talking to a friend about your stress to even the online tools for stress or relationship resolution would have probably accomplished the same thing, without all the PTS/SP re-education and misdirectors.
Illness is not caused by PTSness. PTSness does not exist, but we can convince people it does. It's close in some ways, but oversimplified and impersonal. We are individuals, we have huge variations of conditions, abilities, weaknesses and strengths, education, environments and genetics. Did you become the effect of stress in your life in some area? Absolutely.
Unfortunately, there is no cookie-cutter answer for everyone. The long-term results of PTS/SP education are pretty disastrous.
I pretty much agree with you here. I do think however that PTSness is a workable
paradigm. I like to think of it as being effect of another individual. However in Scn
specially the area of ethics one can recieve many wrong indications and items, and
there is much in the organisation that prompts one to do so, and much in the
subject also. Something which I believe is often missed is False PTSness.
" That same issue brings up the notion of False PTSness, but it points out that “unhattedness, ignorance of Scientology basics for handling life, past bad auditing uncorrected, as well as unhandled bad intentions and personal out-ethics can be mistaken for PTSness and won’t resolve as PTSness.” - See more at: http://www.scientology-cult.com/pts-sp-tech-corrupted.html#sthash.kp6Z8PTG.dpuf"
One may prefer "ignorance of basics for handling life".
Note that later in this issue it say that if your "PTSes" start going over 20%
of staff and public you are probably dealing with false PTSness. Aaah the precision
of this tech. In retrospect you are not doing it right and you know this only after
having given multiple wrong indications and spin ins!!!
Note that this gives some shocking examples of how PTS tech is corrupted.
The other thing is that handling such matters is not to be given to a rookie,
an untrained and un interned rookie at that. Who has never even drilled a PTS handling.
Well I iether possess excellent instincts, am lucky or probably both.
From the start there were problems. A normal senior C/S repair order would be for an FES (Folder Error Study) a D of P Interview, and a repair form. Or FES, D of P interview and to Ethics. Or D of P interview and to the reg. Although I was only trained to Class V, it sure didn't look like rocket science to me. It was all kind of stupid, because at the end of the day, the D of P interviewer was still responsible for finding out what was wrong simply by talking to the person, and despite occasionally infuriating the C/Ses with a lack of reads, I often did the D of P interviews off the cans. It was my option, and looking back, misleading reads were probably half the trouble, anyway. IMHO, the meter reads on all sorts of crap and can really pull someone way down the rabbit hole. MAA was the same sort of thing, talk to the guy, find out what's wrong and resolve the conflict. Only MAA business was often real life conflicts. Again, I didn't use tek much, I just talked to people and had them talk to other people and resolve issues. People are pretty good at resolving things on their own if you tell them they have to do it, lol.
"I just talked to people and had them talk to other people and resolve issues. "
This is different to the 10 aug handling I did how? Well maybe you didn't
do it in reception.