Paul, I get your point, but I'm not sure you're getting mine.
I believe this was originally a mish-mash compilation of every reference of any sort from any COS source related to Scientology intelligence, ethics or investigations that someone was accumulating from pulling references off the Internet for years. So it includes references from Advance Mags, HCOPLs and various other COS sources.
I believe its original source(s) is those who posted various references on the Internet.
As I've pointed out earlier, the actual OSA references would include org board, stats, details of the management of Narconon, ASI, Volunteer Ministers and other affiliates run by OSA, how monies are handled and plenty of things we haven't read before, as well as a lot of references that aren't specifically about intelligence or ethics because OSA has a 7 or 9 division org board and would have instructions for every post within that org board, so many OSA N/W references would be relatively benign. Of course, the very first OSA reference would be a description of its establishment and purpose, just like the first GOWW order.
Those aren't here, and it seems most people on ESMB recognize what is here as pretty familiar stuff. Basic MAA/Dir I&R stuff, mostly, which is in HCOPLs, FOs and other references that are not necessarily also OSA N/W references.
Then there are things that appear to be just added in by whoever compiled these, as I pointed out earlier.
I'm not reading into Mike Rinder's words, I'm taking his opinion as what it seems to be - these are not the real thing. He brushed them off completely without much further comment than that. I also recognize some things in there, just as he did, but a lot doesn't seem to be OSA N/W to me, either, just general ethics stuff or a mishmash.
Going through this pile to find what could be a genuine OSA publication v what isn't is like going through scn to find out what works. Not worth it to me, and the important stuff that we didn't have before still isn't there, either.
As a general idea of how scientology intelligence works and how scientologists think who work in intelligence, it's useful. But I see general org ethics and MAA stuff mixed in with it, so it's also confusing and a bit misleading, IMO.
Added:
As far as conspiracy goes, I'm referring to such a mind that would have such an extreme obsession with Scientology intelligence operations that someone would actually spend years and years gathering every scrap of anything off the Internet that could possibly be related to COS intelligence operations. Some of that information gathered could be false, of course. It doesn't mean that the person who gathered it all didn't believe it was all original at the time and I'm sure a lot of it is. Making them into OSA N/W Directives is going too far, though, to convince others of this person's "hidden data line" beyond the Internet. There is too much missing here and other problems with it, and conveniently, nobody with an actual set to verify them, either.
Opinions here are pretty split, obviously, but that's my opinion and yours is different. No worries.