An email from Debbie Cook to active Scientologists

[BlackRob]

 

[Lucretia]

It's taken me two days, but I have finally made it through the entire thread!! Phew. Admittedly I didn't read every single syllable, but I did read a lot.

No-one that I can see has mentioned the concept of a "$cientology Spring" arising from Debbie Cooks e-mail, although it has been implicit in many posts. From my limited knowledge of things the several "Arabian Spring"s arose after revolutionary ideas went viral on Facebook and the incumbents could not stop it. The internet cannot be controlled, and presumably Ms Cook knew that once she posted her e-mail it would spread all over the world, and it has.

I have to say that I do not want to see a $cn spring. I do not want to see the cult resurrected in any form whatsoever. $cn can never be any more than it already is - a money hungry, fraudulent mind fuck, because that is what it was always intended to be. The only value in such an e-mail is getting the slightly disaffected to be more disaffected and eventually leaving.

I am totally with Gottabrain

"F&^k you Scientology. It was all worth it just to be here to see you die."

 

[Sindy]

All the usual suspects. Oh, for the want of an original thought.

 

[Gottabrain]

^^^^^

Lucretia! Nice to see you on the Board!

If you got through this thread in two days, you are one fast speed reader!

Maybe we should have a special ESMB T-shirt with that saying! (uh maybe not... the Scns would probably accuse us of threatening to kill them or cry religious persecution or something)

 

[DoneDeal]

I am totally with Gottabrain

"F&^k you Scientology. It was all worth it just to be here to see you die."

lol...

That is the quote of the thread.

And I'm completely with it. I don't have an ounce of sympathy for any scnist.

Yes. I might be mean, beats me.

I want them all to feel like complete fools before they die. I had too. Especially the reges, which is 99 percent of "us".

F 'em...Cook too.

That said..I actually am a fun loving joker and degrader type guy...and loving it!

 

[Lucretia]

^^^^^

Lucretia! Nice to see you on the Board!

If you got through this thread in two days, you are one fast speed reader!

Maybe we should have a special ESMB T-shirt with that saying! (uh maybe not... the Scns would probably accuse us of threatening to kill them or cry religious persecution or something)

Aw Shucks!!

I have been lurking, but have not had lot of time for posting. I'm on holidays at the moment though!

I like the idea of a T-shirt!!! Maybe instead of die (although I agree with that completely) how about - ......disappear up your fundamental orifice. A bit wordy, but well...na, f&^k it, I like die.

 

[Operating DB]

....

 

[CarmeloOrchards]

quix·ot·ic

ADJECTIVE:

1. Caught up in the romance of noble deeds and the pursuit of unreachable goals; idealistic without regard to practicality.

2. Capricious; impulsive: "At worst his scruples must have been quixotic, not malicious" (Louis Auchincloss).

So, what exactly is he saying about Debbie's quest?

I think he's talking about her avocation of riding a horse and jousting with windmills

[video=youtube;r5KeGccP9Jk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5KeGccP9Jk&feature=related[/video]

 

[Jump]

I think he's talking about her avocation of riding a horse and jousting with windmills

[video=youtube;r5KeGccP9Jk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5KeGccP9Jk&feature=related[/video]

Well, goooo llleee Sargent Carter!

 

[Thrak]

oneonewasaracecar said

The things we can't be certain of
1) Whether or not she has an exit strategy to avoid being RPF'd.

She's not on staff so they can't. Also this thing has gotten international attention so I think even Davey is smart enough to avoid that one.

2) Whether she is sincere or using this as a way of damaging the church.

No but she wants to damage DM. She's still a ronbot as far as I can tell.

3) Whether or not she has an actual takeover plan of which this is a small part.

Maybe, I'm sure she's scouring the scriptures to try to find out what ron the con would do and how she could pull this off.

4) Whether or not she is an idealistic fool who believes the organization can really be fixed.

Probably.

5) Whether or not she backing of some sort (FBI for example). The current economic climate makes this conjecture more favourable especially with the 1 billion dollar amount being floated around. Especially when we consider Gottabrain's speculation regarding the money and in particular this little snippet

I doubt it. I think she threw that one out just to piss people off which I'm sure it did. When they dredge you, I mean reg you for some reason they don't mention that they've got a billion sitting there collecting interest. Instead they tell you the world will end if you don't commit financial suicide before Thursday at 2. They slightly misrepresent the situation.

Regardles of her intentions, I think Thrak and Smilla are correct: this statement originating from within as it has and according to KSW is a grievious wound, which will bleed public and staff over the next year or so, no matter what else happens. Every time people get regged, it will be like a splinter in their mind.

Very interested to see how this pans out.

VERY!

 

[Stat]

I would like to kill this thread right about now, because there is nothing left to say about Debbie's fake, lame, boring, long-ass email.

1. Besides, she is a squirrel and a hypocrite from what I've heard ("Good standing Scientologist" my ass -see your HCO/OSA terminal for more true details).
2. She is NOT a Captain of FSO anymore, for a long, long time..... and she sucked at it when she briefly was!
3. We got 27 Ideal Orgs that destimulated the 3rd and 4th Dynamic engrams so much, they naturally turned into 27 Saint Hill Size Orgs just this week and YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS! Knock it off, ESMB!

Amnesty is on the way. You are welcome.

 

[Kutta]

Hi BlackRob. How do you know these people have disconnected from Debbie? And where do you get the photos?

 

[Stat]

Hi, Kutta!
These are FB pics, duh.
You already knew it, I'm sure.
I am not BlackRob, but to answer your question
lurk more on WWP. I am pretty sure they are for the lulz.
P.S. It's not all about Debbie.
P.P.S. Rather about Disconnection.
Just a guess.

 

[koki]

# 1100....

 

[TrevAnon]

Some anon posted an image of an e-mail sent by "Wendy" about things wrong in the church. The mail contains a PDF of Blown for good, Marc Headley's book.

Until now no real dox.

http://forums.whyweprotest.net/thre...has-been-sent-to-scientology-followers.98430/

If it is real this might deserve it's own thread.

 

[Vittorio]

Debbie's letter was a wonderful piece of work. She pointed out obvious problems with the COS. The letter was intelligently written. She backed up each criticism with LRH references.

That's what's wrong with her letter. It's way too logical. It's too intelligent.

Think, fellow ex's! How many times did you see a truly intelligent program get implemented?

How many times did you see a completely idiotic program get implemented?

While in, I heard many brilliant programs or solutions offered by logical, intelligent people. I can't think of many that were actually implemented.

She needs to come up with a nutty program to get anything to happen.

Debbie, if you're out there, here's a winning program:
"It's been noted that some FSO public have left Flag while solvent. One pre-OT was found to have a fully paid for home AND a 401K worth in access of $2 million USD!!! Therefore, as of this date: ALL FLAG PUBLIC ARE TO IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO FLAG TO TURN OVER THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS TO THE SUPER POWER BUILDING FUND. COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY. ANY PUBLIC FOUND WITH A POSITIVE BANK BALANCE BY 1 FEB 2012 WILL IMMEDIATELY BE ASSIGNED TO THE RPF. ADDITIONALLY, ANY FLAG PUBLIC WHO FAILS TO TURN OVER ANY 401K's, PENSIONS, PROPERTIES, JEWELRY OR VALUABLE ART TO COB WILL BE DECLARED AND PERMANENTLY BARRED FROM THE UPPER LEVELS. ONCE FOUND GUILTY, THEIR ONLY TERMINAL IS THE FLAG MAA."

THAT'S the way to turn things around in Scientology. Turn in THAT program and DM will be begging for you take over.

If you think that the cos will respond to a sane, workable, well-thought-out program, well, you're dumber than a bag of rocks.



A Scientology solution must, must, must contain LOTS OF CAPITAL LETTERS, LOTS OF BLAME, LOTS OF PUNISHMENT, LOTS OF THREATS, LOTS OF ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE. Anything less is off policy.

I read Mike Goldsteins story yesterday. He left, became an Indie for a couple of years, developed his own processes and then left it all behind. Many take this route and maybe Debbie will be the same.

When I was in the Org we didn't really have time to implement programs properly because we were so overwhelmed with everything else we had to do such as all hands book sales, cleaning, call-ins, writing letters, staff meeting, listening to lectures, IAS briefings. I can't say whether any program worked because the ones I did were not implemented with any passion or thought, just quickied.

...

Scientologists and Indies mistakenly believe that the Grade Chart to total freedom consists of 2 parts, AUDITING and TRAINING.

In fact, there has always been a hidden 3rd part of the Bridge. Donations. Either hard cash and/or 'hard time' on staff. You cannot make it across the Bridge to OT without giving up vast amounts of money and time. You are also expected, by the time you get to the upper levels, to surrender your family, loved ones, free speech and free thought.

Scientology doesn't use the term 'surrender' but instead favors the euphemism 'contribution', as in: "Hey, even though you have thus far paid $ 300,000 for sevices--we are not sure we are going to allow you onto the next OT level until we judge whether you have contributed enough to Scientology."

What I like about Debbie's letter: She makes fellow parishioners aware of the criminal fraud surrounding the 3rd part of the Grade Chart (Donations).

What I don't like about Debbie's letter: She fails to make fellow parishioners aware of the criminal fraud surrounding the 1st and 2nd part of the Grade Chart (Auditing & Training).

Her letter would be perfect if it wasn't for that pesky detail that the entire Bridge to OT is a ridiculous and painfully obvious fraud.

I enjoyed doing some of the grades processes. NED was OK, but I always felt there was something missing. Then I watched Peter Green, Tory Magoo and the Barnes talking. Peter had been out the longest and had spoken with a psychologist who did past life regression who said that he never asked for an earlier similar because it put a suggestion in a persons mind that there was one. I actually agree.

Whilst there may be some value to people in Scientology, there comes a point where it's worth against it's losses are too great. How can you sacrifice the truth for a bridge to total freedom? It just doesn't work like that! Spiritual freedom in my opinion is measured in actions and that includes confronting immorality in anything that claims to be powerful. Scientology itself is like a test of a persons character in the scheme of things.

I know it's not the only tech and as Larry Anderson said 'it's not the only way out of the trap'. But Scientologists and probably even Ron believe that it is. There is so much to be discovered from living life! Life is too short to have enemies everywhere. It's stimulating to discuss texts and to challenge them, to adapt them to a changing world, to combine religion and spirituality with modern ethics, to have the choice to use only information that you feel has personal worth and to do away with the rest. It's also OK to walk away from something when you have what you need from it. The idea that you have to have bridge is an old occult idea or 'Anthar Kharana' (over the rainbow). Hubbard mixed his occult and spiritual ideas a great deal. He created a grade chart similar to the occult and masonry. He built a castle which is a little womb shaped. Most Scientologists don't see the symbols all arouond them, or just refuse to look.

I think now may be the time for DM to put this whole thing to bed. To tell
the REALLY BIG SECRET he has been holding in for all the past 65+ years.
To explain the REAL reason for the release of The Basics. The real reason why
Debbie Cook can go on citing what El Ron said till she turns blue in the face;
the reason why real, true, actual, genuine, Scientologists should ignore everything
El Ron ever wrote or said. You see, if you want to go to TRUE SOURCE, you
must go to Davey Miscaviage...NOT EL Ron Hubbard. L. Ron Hubbard
was the biggest SP in 76,000,000 years, biggest SP since Xenu!

You see, the real originator of Dianetics and Scientology was Davey Miscaviage.
In DM's life immediately prior to his current identity, he was none other than
Aleister Crowley. Crowley actually wrote DMSMH, and all the true genuine
Scientology Scriptures. Alas though, somehow Hubbard (a trusted neophyte
Black Magic student Crowley was generously mentoring) managed to treacherously
kill Crowley just before the Occultic Master was about to release his great
works to an eagerly waiting world. That happened in 1947.

Hubbard grabbed all of Crowley's unpublished manuscripts and notes. The next few
years he spent maliciously (but cleverly) changing the Master's words so that
later unsuspecting PC's could never realize the gains Crowley had intended.
These bastardized Crowley works were released by the SP Hubbard (underhis own name) over the
the next 30+ years.

Meantime, around 1960, Crowley picked up a new body...none other than
David Miscaviage. DM, being the first genuine OT the universe ever produced,
set to work at an early age restoring his legacy, a legacy dastardly cut short back
in 1947 by the conniving L. Ron Hubbard. DM soon got into Scientology, into
the Sea Org...indeed to the very inner circle of that Snake in The Weeds
who done him dirty back in '47. When the SP Hubbard finally kicked the
bucket (like SPs tend to do), DM lost no time in quickly taking the reins of the
organization which would never have been left in the hands of Hubbard and his
SP cronies had Crowley been more vigilant, more alert back in 1947.

So, now you know! The truth is out. Do you now see why "The Basics" were
so vital? Why Scientology has grown at such an astonishing pace since
COB has been at the helm? That when Debbie Cook refers to L Ron Hubbard's
deceptions to justify her scurulous, cowardly mutiny...she is asking us
to honor the biggest SP of all. Protect your Eternity, Stick with Source,
All The Way With COB!

On a serious note, I believe that Hubbards time with Crowley greatly influenced his outcome in life. Hubbard was serious about his Church, he took his own medicine, we know that from Otto Roos and David Mayo. But there is no acknowledgement to the Crowley connection other than what Terril once posted here; That uniformed SO members appraoched a former OTO/Scientologist and asked for information for upper level research. This goes to show that Hubbards OT discoveries are somehow connected to methods that Crowley used to 'get information'. Possibly drugs, chanelling, automatic writing and occult information held elsewhere. No suprise he didn't list his sources.

Debbie Cook's main complaint seems to be that Scientology is cannibalizing its own membership, and then taking the money from that and stashing it away. She feels that "fund raising" is out of control (apparently is unaware of Hubbard's money-sucking instructions not contained in the Green Volumes, and that ripping-off Scientologists is actually on-Source.). So, instead of sucking the existing membership dry, she proposes a revitalized dissemination program, and envisions a resulting flow of new people into the Orgs, where they can be subjected to all the "standard" Scientology handlings, including good old fashioned hard sell as it has existed since the 1960s.

She also expressed concern over "Clears" having their Clear status revoked, etc., but that situation dates back, at least, to Hubbard's decision that there were lots and lots of Clears - Dianetic Clears - and that these thousands of suddenly discovered Dianetic Clears should skip the middle grade chart and jump right into their upper Orgs (and out of the Missions that Hubbard was about to start looting).

For newbie lurkers, here's former C/S International, Class 12, Hubbard's personal auditor, David Mayo's views on the topic of Clear, from a 1991 article: http://www.ivymag.org/iv-01-02.html
_________________________________________________________________
START QUOTE

Clear

By David Mayo, USA.​

In late 1978, the state of "dianetic clear" was announced. Within a few months two other "states of clear" were introduced: the state of "natural clear" and the state of "past life clear".

This change had two immediate consequences:

1. The number of people attesting (correctly or falsely) to having attained the "state of clear" increased enormously.
2. During and after that period, there was a considerable amount of upset and confusion about the "state of clear".

There were those who considered that a dianetic clear was not a "real clear" and that the only "real clear" was one who (like them) had done the Clearing Course. Some felt that they had gone clear in their last lifetime. Some felt that dianetic clear explained why they had never been able to run dianetic auditing successfully. A large number of auditors, C/Ses, and others felt that there were a lot of people falsely attesting to the state of clear and either

a. Felt unethical about letting the person attest, or
b. Tried to handle it and ended up involuntarily invalidating the pc. No matter how this was "handled", it has persisted as a problem. So we can at least assume that there are aspects of it that haven't been taken into account and handled.

Let us examine more closely what happened in late 1978 and early 1979. LRH was being audited and concluded that one of the things wrong with his case was that he had been audited on dianetic auditing after he had attained the "state of clear" (which he at first thought had occured in objective processing). He then issued a bulletin forbidding the running of dianetic auditing on clears and made various other technical and administrative changes.

He cancelled the state of "keyed out clear" by stating that it was the same state as "clear". He changed the definition of "clear" (and subsequently changed it several more times). He order ed that the folders of pcs (and the pcs themselves) who might have gone clear in orgs and missions be routed to Advanced Orgs. This action resulted in an emptying out of the orgs and missions and a flood of people arriving at the AOs.

At first, people were being declared clear regardless of what they thought they had gone clear on or when this had occurred. More importantly, they were being declared clear regardless of the state of case or condition they were in. In fact, one bulletin went so far as to advise that case and ethics trouble could be caused by a person having attained clear without having the state acknowledged. As a result, many persons who were declared clear were actually in very poor condition. This practice reflected badly on the "state of clear" and the workability of the tech. It caused a great deal of upset and confusion on the subject of clear.

At that time there was a shortage of instructions on how to handle dianetic clear technically and a general lack of data on the new subject of "dianetic clear". However persons accused of mis-handling dianetic clear were handled with heavy ethics. The "invalidation of clear" was named a Suppressive Act, while permitting someone to attest falsely was also a serious ethics offense.

A step in the procedure for handling these new clears was to establish the date when the person went clear. Sometimes the date so found would be before scientology or even prior to the pc's lifetime. When LRH heard that some persons considered that they had attained the "state of clear" in an earlier practice such as Buddhism, he became very upset. He stated that the idea that a person could go clear through any other means than scientology was "suppressive". At a certain point, he also got upset at the fact that people were concluding that they had gone clear in scientology auditing. So he specified that a person can validly go clear only in dianetic auditing. He handled the "earlier than this life time" clears by deciding that they either went clear in their last lifetime in dianetic auditing (presumably if they were young enough for this to be possible) or had attained a new state he dubbed "natural clear". His new theory was that some people had never been anything but clear. However, he refused, thereafter, to issue any further clarification of what he meant by this assertion.

Throughout this period, the definition of clear and/or dianetic clear kept changing - in the direction of dilution. Thus people came to expect less and less from the "state of clear", while the number of new clears (and thus new arrivals at AOs and Gross Income) steadily increased. None of the new definitions of "clear", and none of the new techniques for handling clears or programming them for further actions, really solved any of the problems caused by the advent of dianetic clear.

It is of interest that the definition of "clear" had already been changed several times between its first definition in DMSMH (The book, Dianetics: Modern Science of Mental Health, 1950, by L. Ron Hubbard) and the time the idea of "clear" was put forth. In DMSMH, a clear was said to be 4.0 on the tone scale, with no aberrations (held down sevens), no psychoses, neuroses, nor psychosomatic illnesses. The clear was said to have eidetic recall and highly enhanced perceptions and creativity. Although this chappie didn't have any OT powers, he was definitely quite a phenomenon!

It is also significant that the attributes of a clear, as described in DMSMH, were never actually attained, although in reading DMSMH, one might be led to believe that they were. When people started attesting to clear, the definition was watered down to the vague generality "at cause over mental MEST as regards the first dynamic". This definition can mean many different things to many different people. Anyone is at least somewhat causative over his own mind. So anyone can find an interpretation of this definition of "clear" that he can attest to. The states of "MEST Clear", "Theta Clear", "Cleared Theta Clear", "Clearing Course Clear", "Clear-OT", and, finally, "Dianetic Clear", and "Word Clear" were equally absolutistic when first stated, but when people started attesting to them, the definition of each, or the criterion for allowing a pc to attest to each, was similarly watered down. This sequence has been repeated over and over throughout the history of scientology.

LRH correctly stated that absolutes are unattainable. And the notion of "clear" is an absolute. It's like the notion of "clean" or "pure". When is water pure? When it has only one part per million of arsenic and rat poop? Nowhere in the universe is there water which is 100% pure. To obtain complete Clarity would require a complete as-isness of any universe the thetan was in and a return to complete native state. Everyone does have a reactive mind - his own reactive mind. That's why one flies ruds and goes E/S and gets off BPC on anyone regardless of their point on the grade chart. The mechanics of the reactive mind continue to exist all the way up.

"Clears" have always had trouble explaining why they still act reactively at times, or a lot of the time, and why they still have problems in life and in getting along with people. The amount of mileage you can get from the notion of a "cleared Cannibal" is very limited. Even a cleared cannibal, if he were really clear, would get along wonderfully in life, never manifest misemotion, and love all his fellow beings, even as he was having their bodies for dinner!

The idea of "harmonics of clear" is quite accurate. The main reason why LRH blew up at the idea of "harmonics of clear", as expressed in the HCOB I wrote, was, as he told me, that this idea tended to leave him open to the charge that the claims he had made in DMSMH and elsewhere concerning the "state of clear" were fraudulent.

The truth appears to be that there are various stages of release, at each one of which you are clear-er than you were. A person experiencing the glee of insanity is clear-er than someone who is just completely unconscious. It was PR and marketing considerations that led Hubbard to decide that certain people were "clear" at a certain point, and that they therefore had no reactive mind. However this assertion is a lie, and a very destructive one, one that denies case gain to a great many people and provides a too-convenient rabbit button for pc's, auditors and C/S's who are having trouble with the pc's case. The claim that case and ethics problems can be caused by being clear was:

1. Absurd on the face of it.
2. A declaration of open rabbitting season.

Trying to define "clear" is difficult because it is being done over a lie. We either have to restore the meaning of clear to its original absolute meaning (which means that there aren't any clears in existence), or we have to say that what people have attested to as clear is actually only a state of release or reduction.

We can say that the purpose of auditing is to clear aberrations and that if all aberrations were cleared, a "state of clear" would be attained. The concept of "clear" is useful as an ultimate goal, like the goal of perfect happiness or of perfect anything. It is a direction in which to continue to progress. It is not an attainable state (at least given our present level of technology).

Another part of the problem is that the states of release and clear are only subjective. Asking an aberrated person to decide when he feels or thinks that he is no longer aberrated, is asking for a delusory "cognition" from the start. At one time [ca. 1959. Ed.], LRH postulated that the state of clear could be objectively proven by the presence of a "free or floating needle" and a TA position of 2.0 (Female) or 3.0 (Male). But this was an unverified guess that did not stand the test of time.

Perhaps what we have been calling "clear" is "no longer chronically affected by engrams" or "engrams no longer in chronic restimulation." As such, the state would be more accurately described as a state of release or as a state of reduction. In other words, it would mean that the majority of a person's aberrations had gone into abeyance.

Regardless of what the state is named, the recognition that a person can continue to be come clear-er, restores hope and makes progress possible again.


END QUOTE
________________________________________________________________


Debbie also states, "LRH personally turned over the upper levels to Ray Mitthof."

These would have been the many OT levels above OT 7, promised by Hubbard in January 1977. David Mayo had some observations about this, mainly that it consisted of mostly indecipherable session notes. So, I think that Debbie is going to have a rude awakening on this one.

If the extreme fundraising were to end, and those many upper upper levels were to exist or something pasted together as those levels and released, and the slave bracelets were to be loosened slightly so as to no longer chafe, and a show was made of "putting policy and tech back in," etc., perhaps Debbie's dream of a revitalized Scientology would be possible, and then we'd have Scientology circa the 1970s/1980s.

Hopefully she, and those who received her e-mail, will dare to consider something beyond a return to that "ideal scene."

Simply having some people shaken loose from the organization - at least to some extent - will free some of them to look further at previously forbidden information. And that's good.

She doesn't seem to protest the cost of courses either which are extortionate. It costs a LOT of money to be audited even in a Class V Org. Way out of the affordability of ordinary people.

I'm getting away from this Debbie Cook business for a couple of days. As intriguing as it is, I don't wish to be caught up in this like a puppet on a string.

 

[Kookaburra]

Some anon posted an image of an e-mail sent by "Wendy" about things wrong in the church. The mail contains a PDF of Blown for good, Marc Headley's book.

Until now no real dox.

http://forums.whyweprotest.net/thre...has-been-sent-to-scientology-followers.98430/

If it is real this might deserve it's own thread.

Wendy might be a newly escaped Scientologist, but that email won't necessarily impact on those in. The ones that have an effect are ones from what Scientology calls "opinion leaders", senior execs in the SO, OT 7s and 8s, very active local Scientologists. People like Debbie and Geir Isene.

The Scios are a bit too much brainwashed to respond to simple common sense or a suggestion that they take a look.

It might start to have an effect after many of their friends leave, though. At some point, the questioning must start. But it never ceases to amaze me how much it takes to initiate that process.

 

[Smilla]

Re: DC was a Corporate Officer as well as the Commanding Officer

I didn't realize that Debbie Cook was not just the CO for FSO but she was also on the Board of Directors as well for at least 14 years.

Statement from POB:

"For thirty years, Debbie Cook fooled us into believing that she was an upstat, highly productive, commited Scientologist, whilst secretly being an upstat, highly productive, commited Scientologist. This, of course, means that she is psychotic and a squirrel."

 

[SchwimmelPuckel]

Re: DC was a Corporate Officer as well as the Commanding Officer

Statement from POB:

"For thirty years, Debbie Cook fooled us into believing that she was an upstat, highly productive, commited Scientologist, whilst secretly being an upstat, highly productive, commited Scientologist. This, of course, means that she is psychotic and a squirrel."

Impeccable Scientology logic!

 

[Smilla]

Don't know if anyone caught/posted this already, but I noticed that in his blog, Marty called Debbie's letter and effort "Quixotic".

It would be soooooo cool if Debbie starts her own competitive Blog and started drawing some of the Indies over.

Then we'd have 3 kinds of Scientologist all competing for the same parishioners.

THE COS SCIENTOLOGIST

THE INDIE SCIENTOLOGIST

THE DECLARED BUT STILL IN GOOD STANDING WITH RON SCIENTOLOGIST
​

Yes, that jumped out at me too. Makes me think that he's not in communication with Debbie, and that he has no part in what she's doing. In his 'not very literate, but own's several dictionaries' style, 'quixotic' might well mean 'stupid.'