I don't get it.
If you don't think much of "Encyclopedia Drammatica" being substantial, why do you want to relate yourselves to Anonymous??
If you don't, then you aren't. - It's that simple.
Do you believe in Wikipedia, then?
I feel myself a moron amongst you, highly educated pricks (and bitches) who deal only with *true* sources of data.
Sense. This doesn't make it.
Dramatica, is blabber for the most part and whether one thinks much of it or not, has nothing to do at all whether one wishes to remain or associate or relate to Anon or call themselves thusly.
As well, 'Do you believe in Wikipedia?' , huh? What in the world has that got to do with anything? Wiki is an open source encyclopedia and as a concept and way of gathering information via their sources etc. it is a
concept I can 'believe' in, but as with anything, to blindly accept it as a be-all-end-all source would be foolish, which is amongst one of the reasons that to quote it as a source on its own is generally not accepted in most academic environments.
To compare the two of these is like comparing Monty Python's 'Meaning of Life' to a high school biology text imho.
Deriding yourself then insulting others, hm, kinda heading off the thread's origional topic much? anyway, the ONLY post of importance in this thread is post #1.
End of my bit o' derailin'.