In terms of Anti-Scientologists who are under the radar, I don't think anti-Scientology is totalitarian enough.
I think that people close to Tony Ortega, for instance, need to push down his version of "command intention" in order to let the ninnies beneath him know what they should think, who they should link to, what ideas should be discussed - even what friends they should allow to be known publicly.
But it is easy for under the radar anti-scientologists to express their personal opinions privately - as long as the people they express their opinions to swear never to tell anyone - which is usually the beginning of every back-channel Anti-Scientology phone call ever.
This probably happens in every human group and social network - including those in totalitarian countries.
I'm just saying that I've discovered that the phenomena of "under the radar" occurs in Anti-Scientology - just like it does in Scientology.
It was surprising to me.
For Veda, my writing about this was an attempt to create rumors of disloyalty among the ranks. Like a Sea Org member seeking out "external influences" causing PTSness.
But it's actually just human nature.
I think even Hannah Arendt described all of this as the 'banality of evil'.
Given the plain human moral cowardice I've witnessed in both Scientology and Anti-Scientology, the 'banality of evil' much more closely describes my experiences in and out of Scientology than "layers of an onion".