degraded being
Sponsor
This thread comes about as a response to some of Kha Khan's thread: Why do YOU cling to the "Tech?"
I don't want to derail his thread by focussing on one issue.
After scientology - but not as a reaction against scientology - I got the idea that it would be good to get rid of all my delusions - to see the world as it is. I thought it would be good if everyone did this, but didn't push it on anyone.
To me, getting rid of delusions tied in with Eastern ideas as I interpreted them.
I did not pursue this in a very structured way. It was just one purpose or objective in ideas I was thinking about, trying to see the world as it is.
After some years, for some reason I came to think that although I was not free of delusions, I was a lot better at recognizing them in myself and others. I had a sort of ephiphany which was that "People NEED delusions".
I did not get too analytical beyond that. I did not start to think that delusions should just be accepted, more along the lines that you can't just rip away all delusions, because if that was done a person might go nuts. So I just decided that if they were there that was ok, but best to anylyze them, criticize them, investigate them and find out about them, and if they could be gotten rid of it would probably enable a much better view of the world.
I think all the BTs stuff, and the "good" BTs, AKA "spiritual teammates" and "angels" "guides" "entities" or a belief which is strong but cannot define them, are delusions. More so to the degree that they are given autonomy. I suppose there are lots of other things people would call delusions.
The type of delusion I have mentioned gets more popular everyday. I only see two things in it. One is a lack of ability to question things. The other is an unwillingness to question things. The first can be changed by some sort of education. The second often persists despite education.
What are the payoffs? What are the deficits? of delusions.
I don't want to derail his thread by focussing on one issue.
After scientology - but not as a reaction against scientology - I got the idea that it would be good to get rid of all my delusions - to see the world as it is. I thought it would be good if everyone did this, but didn't push it on anyone.
To me, getting rid of delusions tied in with Eastern ideas as I interpreted them.
I did not pursue this in a very structured way. It was just one purpose or objective in ideas I was thinking about, trying to see the world as it is.
After some years, for some reason I came to think that although I was not free of delusions, I was a lot better at recognizing them in myself and others. I had a sort of ephiphany which was that "People NEED delusions".
I did not get too analytical beyond that. I did not start to think that delusions should just be accepted, more along the lines that you can't just rip away all delusions, because if that was done a person might go nuts. So I just decided that if they were there that was ok, but best to anylyze them, criticize them, investigate them and find out about them, and if they could be gotten rid of it would probably enable a much better view of the world.
I think all the BTs stuff, and the "good" BTs, AKA "spiritual teammates" and "angels" "guides" "entities" or a belief which is strong but cannot define them, are delusions. More so to the degree that they are given autonomy. I suppose there are lots of other things people would call delusions.
The type of delusion I have mentioned gets more popular everyday. I only see two things in it. One is a lack of ability to question things. The other is an unwillingness to question things. The first can be changed by some sort of education. The second often persists despite education.
What are the payoffs? What are the deficits? of delusions.