What The Senate wants
The other side of the coin is that this isn't just about the cult from the Oz Senate's point of view.
Folks who have a view on the issue of who should benefit from charitable tax benefits and who should not, and on what basis, should also submit their views.
Using the Cult as an example is one option, but what other rip-offs of the system are you aware of?
The question being asked by the Senate committee is: should we enact new legislation to deal with fraudulent tax avoidance/evasion by pseudo charities?
I see one of the submissions which argues that the Senate should not pass this measure based on "this one exception to the rule" -- viz: the CofS is a bad actor, but we should not pass new law "just to handle it."
This sort of twoddle should be argued against.
My argument is that it is precisely because there are exceptions to good and honest conduct that law needs be passed to prevent such bad conduct becoming the common accepted occurrence . . a la the recent financial scandals which have gone on for too long without new law to contain them.
And on this basis I will be making ANOTHER submission to argue this view to counter the position that we don't need new law
One submission posted (from a lawyer) states that there is already sufficient law on the books to handle "the CofS situation"
. . . in my view, the big question becomes: if so, why has the government not acted?
So, the issue is beyond just this cult of the CofS and other pseudo religions . . . it is about giving our government all the tools needed to prevent and to curtail any and all abuses in our society as exemplified by the CofS.
Get your thinking gear working folks, and make submissions.
Rog