Auditing Recalls with 56 perceptics. I'm wondering if there's
a tech. terminal with experience who will give a round up on
the percentage of people who can run basic Dianetics processes,
running out locks, secondaries and engrams against those
who are not up to it. This I believe is sorted out on the Bridge,
with ARC Straightwire. Can you reveal your experiences as
a PC, and what you experienced when you recall an event in an
auditing session, i.e. what do you perceive.
What percentage of people out of the general populace do you think
have the ability to be run on basic Dianetics technology; and does ARC
Straightwire sort this out?
My guess is that less than 10 percent of people can recall past events,
to the extent of having charge release. Also that ARC Straightwire,
(which is the running processes out of the book Self Analysis) would work
on that same percentage to any appreciable degree, and only slight
improvements over 100's of hours are possible.
Has anyone experienced a huge ability increase to recall life events on
the lower levels Scientology?
The "56 (55?) perceptics" - so I was told - was the result of posting a list of "perceptics" and inviting others to add to it. The book, 'Self Analysis' uses a far shorter (and more realistic "perceptics" list), and "ARC Straightwire" is a simple recall process that doesn't necessary involve a set list of "perceptics."
It's easier to "run locks" (unpleasant "key ins"), than it is "secondaries" (loses, which could be said to be a kind of heavy "lock"), and "engrams" would be the most difficult, as these (per theory) would contain pain, threat to survival, and (degrees of) unconsciousness, and even these "engrams" would be a kind of "lock" on the "basic engram," which was (1950) supposed to be around birth, or the prenatal area, or even conception, then became (with Hubbard attempting to upset his former business partner Don Purcell) ("basis basic") from "trillions of years" ago.
There are some who do not have "mental imagery" in their "recall." In Dianetics, it's common practice to ask the person, "What do you see?" and for these folks that's a problem. They have other senses ("perceptics") in recall but not the visual, so cannot see "mental image pictures," and were usually regarded as difficult cases, that is until Hubbard decided that almost everyone was already "Clear" and should exit the "Missions" and flock "up lines" with their checkbooks in hand, at which point having any sort of difficulty "running Dianetics" usually meant the person was probably already "Clear." Being "Clear," the person could be placed on a program, at an "upper org," where Hubbard had easier access to the money - that is prior to his looting the "Missions".
I've no idea what percentage of the populace can "run Dianetics," but the percentages would likely dwindle as one went from "lock" to "secondary" to "engram" to "basic engram," then "basic basic engram" to super-engram, etc. (It goes on and on, potentially, just turn up the sensitivity on your e-meter).
I can't say that I, personally, "experienced a huge ability increase to recall life events" on the "lower levels," as my ability to recall was already pretty good.
As for "PCs," it varies. In Scientology/Dianetics, under the pressure of expectation to recall past lives, PCs will indeed recall "past lives," and much of that, IMO, is imagination. (I know one could check for "dub in," but that's seldom done, and pretty much anything is accepted, with the auditor usually delighted that the e-meter is behaving as expected (needle falls, TA rises, TA blows down, PC has cognition, "VGIs," needle floats, etc.)
Having looked at a fair amount of PC folders (in $cientology), a lot of the "past life incidents" ("engrams") are pretty "light," and appear to be re-cycled Hubbardian "whole track" ('History of Man', etc) tales, or scenes from movies, etc. Only a small percentage appear to be actual intense occurrences.
Away from $cientology, IMO, there can still be some benefit to the auditing experience but, as the Xenu-people of the Scientology Freezone have demonstrated, that initially potentially beneficial early auditing can lead to the land of Hubbardian Grimm-fairy tales rather quickly. So beware.
Located this post which describes auditing 'Self Analysis' (somewhat informatively) outside $cientology. Hope this helps.
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=94279&postcount=25