To give him the benefit of the doubt, is he just gun shy because Debbie Cook got sued? She certainly got the best of the cult, but for people who can't afford someone like Jeffrey the prospect of being sued could be frightening.
I'd imagine Brian Culkin is in shock about the consequences of his actions right now. I think he got played by the CofS. BIG TIME. I think we'll eventually find out more about how it all went down. Right now the room is full of smoke, once that settles we might learn more about it. I'm not making excuses for him but would need to know more about what actually went down. I may be seen as being Pollyanna about it that's what I see on a quick scan of the dox. I'm reluctant to tar and feather anyone for the simple crime of being stupid.
How "stupid" to be paid $350,000 at no real cost to himself, but at great cost to numerous other people. I weep for him.I'm reluctant to tar and feather anyone for the simple crime of being stupid.
PreferToBeAnon2 • 26 minutes ago
Culkin was NOT naive. At the least, he got an earful from Rinder BEFORE this went down. At the most, he was an OSA plant trying to get info on the case Rinder was putting together. Paragraphs 12-14 of the Sarah Heller Declaration nail it. Rinder told Brian that he was jeopardizing the Garcia case and told him not to go to arbitration. He wasn't swayed in the moment by a silver-tongued $cientology serpent. He actually communicated with Rinder about it BEFOREHAND. I also suspect his attorney chatted with him about it. And, he also knew that there are at least 10 other folks who are working to file cases against the church. He participated in conference calls with them. Culkin knew exactly what he was doing. And he knew that doing the refund arbitration and doing a declaration could throw a wrench into it. That is why I actually think he might have been a spy.
I don't think he was stupid. I don't think he was conned. I don't think it was about the money--he could have filed the case and got his money--all while helping others to set precedent. I think he did precisely what he did with forethought. May he go into one of his pretzel poses and stay that way.
I also think it highly suspect that he asked David Love to take down the video. This was planned. He may or may not have been a spy when Tony did his article but OSA did get to him.
Those paragraphs to me also SCREAM that the arbitration settlement was offered because of the Garcia case--that the declaration was "bought." I don't understand why they would want this in their declaration... but hey... who the hell said that they make sense.
I haven't read any of the Dox yet, but my first response to your post is; Signed when? dated when? witnessed when? under what threat or coercion? Notarized when? Which of ANY this is FABRICATED? In other words, this brings to mind the fact that ANY and each SINGLE WORD and stated connection issued by the Cult needs to be gone over with a fine toothed comb, 'cause there are lies and or misdirection in there somewhere.
Since I posted, I've asked at least 100 additional questions (including the ones you've raised above) about all of the docs posted by Mr. Ortega...for much the same reason as you've pointed out above. IMO, after having read/researched here and elsewhere, there is little to trust at face value when Co$ is involved - too many people have told too much truth (or tried to) about what this cult's done for me to ever accept their version of anything.
JB.
People who know me, know fully where i stand on this issue. There is nothing in that declaration that was secret in any way, shape, or form.
I am truly sorry if I hurt or offended anyone on this blog.
I want nothing to do with Scientology, independent, the church anything.
I just wanted to move on with my life.
Again. I am incredibly upset by this and I feel extremely angry and upset. My hands are shaking typing this.
I never thought for a second I was selling anyone out. And if you put emotion aside and read it closely -- I hope you see the same thing.
-Brian
How "stupid" to be paid $350,000 at no real cost to himself, but at great cost to numerous other people. I weep for him.
I don't understand - the person paid $350k over a year's time at no cost to himself?
Meaning it was selfish for him to take his money and run and not sacrifice a bit and cooperate with the existing lawsuit but instead throw other people under the bus.
Brian Culkin.
What a pussy.
TG1
Brian Culkin.
What a [STRIKE]pussy[/STRIKE] no talent ass clown.
TG1

I don't know that Brian did such a bad thing by settling.
1. If there is a problem with Bob Johnson now working with Babbitt on the case after spending years representing FSO, well that's not Brian's fault. If the org didn't know about the working relationship yet, they would have found out anyway, so it's better to get that cleared up immediately.
2. There are more people waiting in line behind Garcia with a lot more $ at stake than Brian, so in a dollar sense, he's small potatoes.
3. Brian dev-t'ed Mike Rinder. Big whoop! If Mike is out there being a wrangler for the lawyers, he has to know that everything he touches does not turn into gold - he's not OT after all.
4. Brian was only in a very short time, a couple years. Although the intensity level was high for him, it still isn't the decades and multi generational commitment many of us experienced, so it doesn't seem fair to me that I insist that he grasp a transference of my outrage to his own bosom. He's not Christ.
5. Think about the money for a minute. Let's say he got his whole $350k back. Had he not taken it, he would be waiting for an uncertain outcome to his case. Even if he won (or settled - a likelihood?), he'd be giving 40% or so to the lawyers, so there goes about 150k.
6. How much happier would I be if he ended up with an undisclosed settlement a la Debbie? Not much.
I'm glad he got out and got his money.
Garcia, on the other hand, has lots of Latin outrage! I love that. But if Babbitt gets past this speed bump and the case keeps moving forward, settlement offers might appear for Garcia too.
Then what? Are we going to start dumping on Garcia?
How did Brian jeopardize Garcia's case? And who says he was "supposed to be supporting and helping it?"
I don't know that Brian did such a bad thing by settling.
1. If there is a problem with Bob Johnson now working with Babbitt on the case after spending years representing FSO, well that's not Brian's fault. If the org didn't know about the working relationship yet, they would have found out anyway, so it's better to get that cleared up immediately.
2. There are more people waiting in line behind Garcia with a lot more $ at stake than Brian, so in a dollar sense, he's small potatoes.
3. Brian dev-t'ed Mike Rinder. Big whoop! If Mike is out there being a wrangler for the lawyers, he has to know that everything he touches does not turn into gold - he's not OT after all.
4. Brian was only in a very short time, a couple years. Although the intensity level was high for him, it still isn't the decades and multi generational commitment many of us experienced, so it doesn't seem fair to me that I insist that he grasp the transference of my outrage to his own bosom. He's not Christ.
5. Think about the money for a minute. Let's say he got his whole $350k back. Had he not taken it, he would be waiting for an uncertain outcome to his case. Even if he won (or settled - a likelihood?), he'd be giving 40% or so to the lawyers, so there goes about 150k.
6. How much happier would I be if he ended up with an undisclosed settlement a la Debbie? Not much.
I'm glad he got out and got his money.
Garcia, on the other hand, has lots of Latin outrage! I love that. But if Babbitt gets past this speed bump and the case keeps moving forward, settlement offers might appear for Garcia too.
Then what? Are we going to start dumping on Garcia?
To give him the benefit of the doubt, is he just gun shy because Debbie Cook got sued? She certainly got the best of the cult, but for people who can't afford someone like Jeffrey the prospect of being sued could be frightening.