What's new

Bugs in the Brain

Zinjifar

Silver Meritorious Sponsor
Without seeming to support the pseudo-science inherent in the concept <g> the point of the 'zapper' seems to be to generate a 'frequency' or pulsed voltage, which, in the case of 'tapping' is just the most primiitve method.

Since we're just talking 9 volts, all you need to make a better one yourself is a variable resistor, a capacitor and some wire.

Here's an example:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Electronic/relaxo.html#c2

Go to the library and look for any circuit diagram for a 'blinker' circuit. You should be able to vary the frequency with the variable resistor. Naturally, if you want some *specific* frequency, things get more complicated :)

Zinj
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
Without seeming to support the pseudo-science inherent in the concept <g> the point of the 'zapper' seems to be to generate a 'frequency' or pulsed voltage, which, in the case of 'tapping' is just the most primiitve method.

Since we're just talking 9 volts, all you need to make a better one yourself is a variable resistor, a capacitor and some wire.

She gives a complete circuit diagram in the book I referenced, along with Radio Shack part numbers.

She is adamant about things that do and don't work with regard to zapper circuits: some work and others might make the bugs stronger. :)

Just any old make-and-break circuit doesn't work. Since we don't really know the mechanism behind its workability, it's kinda hard to improve on it without doing a bunch of empirical research.

If its "workability" is in doubt, that's fine, I'm not particularly trying to convince anyone.

Paul
 

Zinjifar

Silver Meritorious Sponsor
She gives a complete circuit diagram in the book I referenced, along with Radio Shack part numbers.

She is adamant about things that do and don't work with regard to zapper circuits: some work and others might make the bugs stronger. :)

Just any old make-and-break circuit doesn't work. Since we don't really know the mechanism behind its workability, it's kinda hard to improve on it without doing a bunch of empirical research.

If its "workability" is in doubt, that's fine, I'm not particularly trying to convince anyone.

Paul

Well, I'm just saying that *any* basic blinker circuit would be superior to 'tapping' for creating a pulsed voltage, from once every few seconds to hundreds of times a second, but, I'm not even qualified to recommend variations in OCD rituals, much less anti-parasite frequencies :)

Zinj
 

Mick Wenlock

Admin Emeritus (retired)
http://www2.nau.edu/%7Ebah/BIO471/Reader/Sapolsky_2003.pdf

Back in 1994/5, I built and used a "zapper", as described by Hulda Clark. One of the most profound changes I noticed was in my mental attitude to things. Seven minutes into my first zap I was walking around in the twenty-minute lull before the next "session" and I was amazed at how quiet and calm it seemed in my head. I later told several people the feeling was very similar to the one I had when I attested Clear in 1978. (I heard later that remark almost got me declared.)

On other occasions I noticed that my usual resentment at being told off or given orders completely disappeared every time I zapped, and gradually returned over the next week or so.

Since the zapper suppposedly kills bugs (viruses, bacteria, worms etc.) in the body, I simply assumed that some of these bugs had been chomping around in my brain, some effects of which were various attitudes, and killing them removed these added attitudes. I didn't recall Hulda Clark saying much (if anything) about these mental changes, but what I experienced was what I experienced, and I didn't particularly care if anyone else went along with that theory or not. The zapping also fixes my arthritis twinges and other such things, and again, I don't particularly care if someone thinks that is impossible. It works for me. :)

Today I came across the referenced article, about the exact phenomenon of bugs in the brain hijacking some of the normal neural processes. I smiled.

I still use a zapper every couple of weeks, and have done so since I first started except for the six months I was on the RPF and couldn't.

Your turn Mick. :)

Paul


actually Paul I like you too much to go picking on you every time you say embrace something I consider ridiculous. Part of my New Years Resolutions was to live and let live.

I will not promise not to laugh though.
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
actually Paul I like you too much to go picking on you every time you say embrace something I consider ridiculous. Part of my New Years Resolutions was to live and let live.

I will not promise not to laugh though.

But I like you picking on what I say, Mick, both you and Zinj. Because just as you think some of what I say is twaddle, I think some of what you say is twaddle.

It's real dull here if there aren't contrary views on things.

Especially dumb ones. :)

Paul
 

Zinjifar

Silver Meritorious Sponsor
But I like you picking on what I say, Mick, both you and Zinj. Because just as you think some of what I say is twaddle, I think some of what you say is twaddle.

It's real dull here if there aren't contrary views on things.

Especially dumb ones. :)

Paul

Here's hoping that my twaddle includes actual 'workable' suggestions for rube-goldbergianizing the unicorn in the closet; even if I don't believe in unicorns :)

I do try (sometimes) to take paradigms at their own measure and work with them. In fact, it's one of the more interesting things to do with Hubbardism, since it isn't even *internally* consistent.

Zinj
 

Romuva

Patron Meritorious
Still I admire Paul's cost-effective alternatives.



Free Scientology=Not worth spending any money on.
 

Mick Wenlock

Admin Emeritus (retired)
But I like you picking on what I say, Mick, both you and Zinj. Because just as you think some of what I say is twaddle, I think some of what you say is twaddle.

It's real dull here if there aren't contrary views on things.

Especially dumb ones. :)

Paul

But the trouble is, Paul, that arguing back and forth where neither party is there to learn, is worthless. I enjoy a good fight - probably too much. I have realized that if I get into an argument where I am merely trying to beat down the opposing view, I am not arguing, just bullying.

I respect you too much to just go off on every idea you post about. Even if I disagree with almost everything you post about. Plus - I don't have that much time. :)
 
Top