I found this to be a very comprehensive post and really helped me understand it so much better. The history of it, the progression of it and oh, the alteration of it to what it is today.....a control mechanism just as I was beginning to suspect when this started to crack in my universe.
So much of what you say is what was hard for me to reconcile especially in regards to ethics removing the counter intention from the environment. The greatest good for the greatest number ALWAYS seemed to end up in favor of the 3rd and 4th Dynamics. I had a hard time trying to convince any EO or MAA that they were
my dynamics. Mine, not Scientology's.
I really appreciate your post. Oh and you won't have to worry about me ever reading on that staff qual question ever again.
Thanks, Immortal.
I realized after I wrote that post that I missed something completely. And that is SP declares. When I first learned about SP's and declares, it didn't seem so bad. After all, SP's were super bad, bad,
baaadd people. I had even spotted that I had known one in the past. Totally evil and destructive person. So labeling one if found wasn't such a bad idea, I thought. You would certainly be better off without someone like that around.
Anyway, next thing that happened was the policy on declaring blown staff came out. Well, that was a bit closer to home. My boyfriend was a blown staff member. But he had blown before the policy came out, so he was spared the ax. Later on I joined staff. The policy on Leaving and Leaves came out. So now you could get declared for just saying you wanted to leave, or even go on a holiday! So what is that? It's a cut comm line. Someone who is having a rough time dare not let anyone know. So the people being targeted here are people who have inside knowledge of the workings of an org, and particularly the not so savoury bits of the inner workings of an org. They are
NOT suppressive people.
They are people who know too much and must be silenced! That is half of it.
The other half is the control it puts in on people still in. You cannot talk to people who have walked your path before you. You cannot find out what happened to them. You cannot find out what they discovered, or conclusions they came to. (You're probably discovering this in a big way, right now) You also know that it is not that hard to get declared, and if you do you will lose all your friends and acquaintances in one fell swoop. You will likely have to move house (if you live with other Scios). You will lose your job if you work for or with other Scios. And worst of all, you will likely lose your spouse, boyfriend, possible your children or parents if any of them are Scientologists. And you may, at the time, agree to this if you have bought into the idea that their bridge is their salvation and pulling them out with you would be a ginormous overt. Now this all adds up to one very big stick! It does give HCO far more clout than any human being should ever have over another.
Gone is any concept of granting beingness, of finding one's spiritual path, of confiding in friends, of working out the problems within the group, or any of the normal interactions that occur in normal groups.
Immortal, I must say you have a very understanding and patient family, to keep their mouths shut while you went all the way to OT VIII!
Next thing that happened was the 1982 fiasco, when some of my friends left and went to Mayo's group. As friends they simply vanished from my world. I never had a chance to sit and talk and find out what went down. The rollback tech came out. Any criticism of Scientology was considered an enemy line. So a person voicing it would be given a metered interview and who said this criticism to them would be tracked down, that person brought in and interviewed and so on till the source was found. Now that sure got people not talking! Any outpoint duly noted became and enemy line and an ethics offence to speak about. This time period, btw, was a major turning point in Scn, where it began to get more and more oppressive and controlling. Little wonder...any acknowledgement of anything wrong, much less and attempt to handle it, was severely dealt with!
But even worse than that, the comm line between friends, between spouses, and between family members became very superficial. You never knew when someone would be getting an ethics interview or sec check and your private conversation would be dragged out of them and you would be punished for it. So you just tended not to voice what was really going on with you, or your innermost thoughts. Neither could you say them to your auditor. Auditing had been largely replaced with HCO sec checks, especially for staff. Alltogether, a VERY unhealthy situation. And diametrically opposed to what is supposed to happen in Scientology, theoretically, that is.
This all doesn't sound very ethical, does it?
Sounds more like the third reich, or the KGB getting schoolkids to report on their parents.
I honestly thing that Scn ethics is it's downfall, mostly based on the above points. It is ultimately what will bring Scientology crashing down in a storm of lawsuits, criminal charges and government anti-cult legislation.
Oh, and did I mention Jokers and Degraders policy? That was another one that landed like a small bomb in the org. Humour is defined as ability to spot an outpoint (paraphrased). But spotting an outpoint in the org was suppressive? I guess so. :confused2:
Someone with withholds wrote that PL. (sacrilege)
Gee, if they were still giving out goldenrod, HH would be able to wallpaper his entire house!
Now quite a number of people on this board are declared SPs. And per ethics policy, the rest of us should be. Not to mention that other crowd of 10,000 Anonymous. They are all SPs too! So what does that mean? It very simply means that those inside are not allowed to hear or read what we say. And the only point to that is that they would learn the truth, and they would start questioning and under the current regime, they would leave Scientology.
See, simply a control mechanism.