Gold Meritorious Patron
You went to the smear sites ... of course. And you found lots of stuff that agrees with your beliefs. Of course." Of course, you either didn't get or wish to ignore my point that "Climate Change" advocates are disparaging, denigrating and trying to destroy all who question their dogma"
There you go again, Bill. I looked at the "lots of sources" you provided, and just found a list of climate change deniers who have financial backing from the fossil fuel mob. I did not find anything disparaging, denigrating or destructive, apart from one opinion columnist who spoke of depravity.
How about getting off your high horse and discussing evidence without all the emotional jargon.
But you didn't go to the "evil denier sites" I provided links to.
You want to "discuss evidence" without reading any sites that might have, you know, evidence.
You expect me, or anyone, to explain things in a few simple sentences where experts have written extensive papers refuting the alarmist creed.
If you really want facts, you might start here: Four Reasons Alarmists Are Wrong on Climate Change
And here is a nice list of articles refuting some alarmist claims one by one: Category Archives: Climate Change
And, of course, those "evil denier sites" I mentioned before.
Then we'd have something to discuss.
EDIT: And, if you detect I'm a little annoyed, it's because I hate hypocrisy. You say "I am always interested in facts" and say you want to "discuss evidence" but categorically refuse to even look at skeptic sites.