ESMB has entered archive mode. All posts and threads that were available to the general public are still readable. The board is still searchable. 

Thank you all for your participation and readership over the last 12 years.

If you want to join in the conversation, please join the new ESMB Redux at

Child of Scientologists: hi

Discussion in 'New Member Introductions' started by learningconcern, Jun 20, 2019.

  1. Alanzo

    Alanzo Bardo Tulpa

    Tribal Narrative?


    Ways of explaining minority religious recruitment, adherence, and leave-taking?
  2. strativarius

    strativarius Inveterate gnashnab & snoutband

    I don't need you to tell me how I should interpret my time spent in scientology, I'm quite capable of doing that for myself.

    Why does it bother you personally if other people are 'hysterical' (I haven't noticed any hysteria here myself, and this group is obviously who you are aiming your remarks at) about scientology and cults and brainwashing?
  3. Alanzo

    Alanzo Bardo Tulpa

    Hi there, Strati.

    You can definitely interpret your time in Scientology any way you want.

    I was just telling @learningconcern that there are alternatives to the way you interpret things. And I think those alternatives are more productive, constructive, and reflect the truth better, too.

    Hystericism is not good for a person. Especially over time.
  4. Dotey OT

    Dotey OT Cyclops Duck of the North - BEWARE

    Hystericism is not good for a person.

    After inspecting the disaster that is the Facebook group "Scientology Deprogramming", and looking into the various cabals that are being ranted about, I had to go outside and get a breath of fresh air. Seriously. I don't think I would want to visit that group for any reason in the future. I wonder how anyone can take that level of noisy, people bashing racket. Talk about hysterical, there never was a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. Maybe the people are ok, but they certainly are a hateful and very excited group. I wonder what is happening there? How did it come to that? ESMB can have it's moments, but I believe rationality prevails, at least from my perspective.
  5. strativarius

    strativarius Inveterate gnashnab & snoutband

    I try and steer clear of Facebook most of the time. Not for any particular reason other than I can't figure out how to work it, it's completely beyond me, but having read your post I think I might take a wander over there and see what's going on.
    Enthetan and Dotey OT like this.
  6. Dotey OT

    Dotey OT Cyclops Duck of the North - BEWARE

    Your homework is to find the definition of Rinder Ninnie.
  7. Alanzo

    Alanzo Bardo Tulpa

    You do realize that, in one side of your mouth, you are saying that you wonder how anyone can take noisy, people bashing, while in the other side of your mouth you are bashing those people as "scum"?
  8. Dotey OT

    Dotey OT Cyclops Duck of the North - BEWARE

    Well, actually I was making a play on words from Star Wars episode 4, but you are correct that I do wonder how people could survive in that.

    And I will note that you pointed it out.

    But you did not refute that it indeed was going on.
    Enthetan likes this.
  9. Alanzo

    Alanzo Bardo Tulpa

    Yes. It is one of the very few places on the Internet where Ex-Scientologists are allowed to express this kind of criticism.

    It's an Open group, not a closed one. And it allows all kinds of viewpoints - from never ins such as Angry Gay Pope and others, to freezoners, to Ex & Antis.

    I believe that the trend of stifling free speech and banning people for criticizing the wrong people (because criticizing people goes on all the time in the closed groups, too) is very bad for Exes after Scientology.

    Who the hell would get out of a cult and put up with that kind of information control?

    I sure don't.
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2019
  10. TheOriginalBigBlue

    TheOriginalBigBlue Gold Meritorious Patron

    The Hubbard as Science Fiction Writer narrative is 100 degrees inverted the way Scientologists think.

    Non-Scientologists point to this as a negative explaining that Hubbard is only using his imagination to exploit people as part of a deliberate con.

    But Scientologists believe that Hubbard and other science fiction writers are simply subconsciously tapping into bits and pieces of past life recall and to the degree that they are naturally OT they can do this better than others. LRH was so OT that he could deliberately draw on his past life recall to make enough money selling Sci-Fi which financed his early research into Dianetics and Scientology and therefore made a vital contribution to their philosophy in it's infancy.

    This is part of the larger problem with Scientology indoctrination. Once you operate on the basis (stable datum) that anything can be explained in the context of past lives anything becomes possible and any rationalization for the resulting behavior becomes justifiable. One thing that Scientologists dare not do is honestly question the possibility that past lives do not exist or at least that they do not exist the way Hubbard says they exist. KSW essentially makes that kind of doubt a crime and because they want this to be true so much they accept that as well so now to challenge their doubts about past lives and Sci-Fi is to challenge their sense of ethics, justice and discipline and to confirm the existence of SPs and the long list of other enemies of spiritual freedom.
    Enthetan, Dotey OT and Wilbur like this.