CNN Anderson Cooper Scn program!

Enthetan

Master of Disaster
There are three Verrrrrrrrrry Interesssssssssting 'Pink Elephants' that appear in these 'ex-wife's' stories....

1. They say that their husbands never came home with any signs of having undergone abuse, not even a scratch!


Hmmmmm.... I actually don't know ANYBODY who never comes home with a scratch!!! It's IMPOSSIBLE to live in this world without getting scratched, scraped, head bumpings, tripping, etc. But our little 'wifey poos' would have us believe that their husband came home for decades without even a scratch........

That little bit of investigative 'critical thinking' proves BEYOND A DOUBT that these ladies are LYING OUT THEIR ASS!

2. The 'wifey poos' (2 OR 3 of them) state that it was 'THEIR HUSBANDS' who were the one's who committed the 'beatings' on others; in the case of Rathburn having hit Rinder on occasions....

Wouldn't Rinder have come home with some evidence of having been hit by Rathburn??

OOPS! Second little snafu in these testimonies of 'never a scratch'.

3. The 'wifey poos' (2 OR 3 of them) who state that it was 'THEIR HUSBANDS' who were the one's who committed the 'beatings' on others... wouldn't their husbands (especially Rathburn who appears to have struck others the most- per the Co$ and ex-wife statements).... have come home with some type of self inflicted injury from having beaten on others????

Don't know about 'Terminators' but human flesh gets injured even when one is hitting somebody else!!

That right there is a zinger for flushing most of these ex-wives right down the liars toilet... where the filth and stench of the 'bearing false witness' group hangs out.

Think they are not lying?

Their very words tell you that what they have alleged is humanly impossible.

Part of Anderson Cooper's problem is that if he nailed the ex-wives on their inconsistencies, then the flow of SO members coming on the show to tell their side would have stopped before he was done. So he lets them say their inconsistent statements, gets it all on video, and then on youtube. After that's all done, the blogosphere does the rest of the job.
 

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
Part of Anderson Cooper's problem is that if he nailed the ex-wives on their inconsistencies, then the flow of SO members coming on the show to tell their side would have stopped before he was done. So he lets them say their inconsistent statements, gets it all on video, and then on youtube. After that's all done, the blogosphere does the rest of the job.

He reports.

We decide.
 

Enthetan

Master of Disaster
IMO "coerced abortion" is a whole lot more sensational, particularly when it's done by a so-called CHURCH, and particularly in the current political climate where pro-"life" and pro-"choice" factions already have such loud arguments going on. But fact is that in the USA abortion is legal, getting an abortion is not a crime, "suggesting" someone get an abortion is not a crime, and the decision to actually undergo an abortion is, ultimately, the choice of the affected woman.

The Sea Org's position on abortion is neither pro-life, nor pro-choice (since they apparently apply extreme coercion to make women get abortions, rather than having it be her free choice). Their position is most accurately described as "pro-death".
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
The Sea Org's position on abortion is neither pro-life, nor pro-choice (since they apparently apply extreme coercion to make women get abortions, rather than having it be her free choice). Their position is most accurately described as "pro-death".


Pro-death, pro-stats, pro-SO, pro-Hubbard.

Simple, huh?
 

AnonKat

Crusader
EpicNewsGuy.jpg
 
Top