MostlyLurker
Patron Meritorious
Any effort to reform the Church of Scientology has to hinge around transparency and accountability, which would by definition require termination of confidentiality of Tech and Admin issues, such that all Scientologists knew which policies and bulletins the Church was operating on. With that done, they could make intelligent decisions about which ones to keep, and which ones to toss out (anything advocating confidentiality would be a good place to start, and I'm not talking about PC folders, I'm talking about issues which are "confidential": sekrit).
Agree
I am not sure such a reform is possible, nor am I sure that there is a figure in the FZ or in the Church around whom people would rally if corporate dissolution occurred and a Reformed Church was attempted. Had Ken Ogger been around, a lot of people might have gone for that, twelve years ago. I can think of no FZ Scientology name that has the same power, right now, and am unaware if there is a leader in the Church that people might trust, "technically".
FZers may go for Marty. But does it have to be one person only?