Go grab an old (i.e. prior to 2007) copy of 8-8008. Look at the chapter divisions/headings. They are clearly wrong. Clearly. "Chapter 4" on ARC contains over half the book, with subsequent (intended) chapters as sections. If that was proof-read by anyone important they must have been stoned at the time.
This is funny. Just remembered. I, myself, proofread 8-8008 for Pubs DK around 1982 as a moonlighting action. They paid me for it. Unfortunately, I don't recall if I commented on the chapter headings or not. Possibly not. Heh!
Since clearly you are important, should we take this as a tacit admission that you were routinely stoned at the time?
Mark A. Baker