ESMB has entered archive mode. All posts and threads that were available to the general public are still readable. The board is still searchable. 

Thank you all for your participation and readership over the last 12 years.

If you want to join in the conversation, please join the new ESMB Redux at

Concerning the Ethiers and Blackmail

Discussion in 'General Scientology Discussion' started by Tanstaafl, Apr 8, 2011.

  1. AnonyMary

    AnonyMary Formerly Fooled - Finally Free

    Oh, my misunderstanding on the photo. Maybe she did that to let you know that you could be identified by it in order to be served legally? IIRC, she was the one threatening legal if you didn't remove the posts.

    Thanks, Emma
  2. Terril park

    Terril park Sponsor

    "and then the "Apology"

    "I believe that Terril got her to write this, based upon what she told him her upset was. Frankly, it was Oracle who was upset about the child being mentioned ( and never providing links to substanciate that there were 'terrible posts on ESMB' about the child"

    I've had many mails from Ekaterina for maybe a couple of years. Ignored them.

    They made no sense with her command of english, and just antagonised me.

    Until she made her apology to Emma yesterday. Then I responded.
    I copied her apology here.

    In her field of expertise her english is probably good enough. Must
    be really.

    Said I'll try and help her get what she wants and she's pushing me faster
    than my computer skills can keep up with.

    Its my opinion that she is willing to give more apologies.

    I'm happy people are showing compassion. I'm a dinosaur and can't keep up
    very well. I'll try though.
  3. Alanzo

    Alanzo Bardo Tulpa

    So... what?

    We don't get to go over Tansy's session worksheets?
  4. CarmeloOrchards

    CarmeloOrchards Crusader

  5. CarmeloOrchards

    CarmeloOrchards Crusader

  6. MrNobody

    MrNobody Who needs merits?

    Correct, you can't delete posts from usenet, since there will always be servers which do not process delete requests. Servers you will never even know about, let alone being able to tell where they are and who their Admin is.

    You're not running a usenet server, so you probably don't need to know this, but a highly decorated systems integrator with a bunch of impressive sounding degrees under her belt, should know. That much realism is to be expected from someone in her alleged position. If she can't deliver: Boo fuckin' hoo, it's her job on the line, not yours.

    Even Google Groups doesn't really delete such posts. They just set a "don't display, don't include in search results" flag. I don't know the current status of things, but there were ways to circumvent this flag. Again: E.E. should already know this.
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2011
  7. Emma

    Emma Con te partirĂ² Administrator

    Oh the irony!

    So I went over to Terils forum to warn the FZers over there that their session data might not be as safe as they thought if they were being audited or C/Sed by Pierre Ethier.

    I got a very nasty reception from Dexter who excels in recreating history, and various other strange posts (but that is not the story here).

    I got warned by Terril because I said that Dexter was dilusional and that's just too mean for that forum. Terril warned me that unless I play nicer I'd have to go on a "pre moderated status".

    Then it came up that I was unfair because I had disallowed Terril's success stories on ESMB. The exact quote was:

    I typed my reply as follows:

    But guess what? I'm already on a pre moderated status and so my post is waiting to be approved!!!

    Yes thats right....not only does Terril expect to be allowed to promote Scientology on an Ex Scientology forum, but I cannot do the opposite on a pro Tech forum. And to make sure I don't, I'm having to have my posts approved first!

    This makes me so grateful that I no longer see the world through the narrow insane view available to Scientologists.
  8. TheSneakster

    TheSneakster Guest


    I got banned from there almost immediately for posting that whilst I was a supporter of Hubbard's Scientology Tech, I was still mad at Hubbard for some of his policies and actions and that if I were to be sure I had met him in a new body, I would first punch him out then buy him a beer.

    That didn't go over very well, as I am sure you can imagine.

    I was told I could reapply for membership there, but I would have to promise never to say anything like that again. Naturally, I declined after telling Dexter that only the entire and complete truth about Ron Hubbard and Scientology was ever going to resolve the current "3rd Dynamic Engram" of Co$ and that if they would not allow this on their board, their purpose of saving Scientology was doomed.
  9. I told you I was trouble

    I told you I was trouble Suspended animation


    If would be tragic if it wasn't so funny.
  10. Veda

    Veda Sponsor

    Behind the "handling" with "acceptable truths" (apparent agreement), the love-bombing, the schmoozing, and the faux "ARC"-ifying with emphasis on affinity, by outside the CofS Scientology PRs, the dark little secret is that Ex-Scientologists are seen by Scientologists, including outside the CofS Scientologists, as "failed Scientologists."
  11. jenni with an eye

    jenni with an eye Silver Meritorious Patron

    Thanks Veda for letting the secret out.

    It's a bit :screwy:

    Makes me feel a bit :furious:

    But what the hell :hysterical::hysterical:
  12. Emma

    Emma Con te partirĂ² Administrator

    Ok, so it looks like I'm not "pre moderated" yet. It seems my post just took ages to be processed through Yahoo.

    That might change when Terril wakes up and sees what trouble I've made though! :lol:
  13. I told you I was trouble

    I told you I was trouble Suspended animation

    He's awake!

    He's just trying to work out how to sort this out with ARC (and shit).

  14. Panda Termint

    Panda Termint Cabal Of One

    Despite all his faults, real or imagined, I really like Terril... I can't help it! :)
  15. Mick Wenlock

    Mick Wenlock Admin Emeritus (retired)

    :yes: alas, moi aussi!!
  16. Mick Wenlock

    Mick Wenlock Admin Emeritus (retired)

    quick question

    are tits actually going to make an appearance on this thread or not? I have been following this faithfully and with great hope given that Tansy started the thread and then having to read through endless angst about driveling ethiers and so far - bupkis on the tits front.

    Tansy - let's get to the knockers !
  17. Dulloldfart

    Dulloldfart Squirrel Extraordinaire

    Perhaps the supposedly non-Scio Mrs. E assumed the TITS she glimpsed were of the anatomical variety rather than the acronymic.

  18. Mick Wenlock

    Mick Wenlock Admin Emeritus (retired)

    Is it just me or is this woman a bit of a head banger?
  19. Terril park

    Terril park Sponsor

    Hi Emma,
    As far as I can see you're not on moderated status and have
    posted in fact. I wrote to you in fact and asked you not to describe scn as insanity on my board. Didn't mention anything about Dexter. So you're bitching about each other. Nothing new.
  20. Terril park

    Terril park Sponsor

    Hi Sneaks,
    You can join again if you wish. I have a somewhat similar view to yourself. I didn't even know you joined and were then unsubscribed.

    Its the case that there is no open or public forum connected to scn
    that dosn't have a lot of critical opinion of COS, Scn and Hubbard. The only places free of heavy criticism are some private freezone forums.

    Anyone who wants to look at critical areas will have no problem finding such. I'd even recommend doing that. However the people on Freezone forums don't want such stuff on their forums, and I must respect that.