What's new

Corrections and Advances in More Workable Tech

I told you I was trouble

Suspended animation
Yes. But more to the point - the guy will want to have handled all those things which impede the attainment of his present goal, and the more these things get handled the happier he will be. All well and good you might think, but what if he is following a non-life goal like acquiring heaps of money and smoking fat cigars? What then? All the auditing in the world will only serve to bolster the phoney beingness that underlies the said goal.


Lol, you really shouldn't keep talking about the OP like that Leon (oh, go on then).

Dianetics was only ever 'created' to make hubbard feel and appear superior way back in the 50's after he had been outed as a conman, a liar and a person with mental issues. He was anything but a person most would have placed their own physical, mental or spiritual health with had they known the truth back then (Veda posts dox regularly on hubbard from that time period) ... hubbard used his 'tek' as the basis upon which he built his business/cult, it was the glue used to suck people in and as soon as possible (after as much cash as possible had been extracted) these people were utilised elsewhere and their 'case' was flicked off as irrelevant, hubbard was 'acquiring heaps of money and (probably) smoking fat cigars' as miscavige now is, that's how cults work.

The 'tek' was and is more about hubbard, the auditor and his e-meter than it ever was about the 'PC' ... the 'PC' was needed to provide money and success stories for cult growth (staff very quickly learned that 'PC's' were a necessary pain in the arse).

These tekky threads would be fine (though a bit sad) if there were not people reading them here who are still caught up in the original con working at dissolving the glue that sucked them in, in the first place ... the 'tek'.

No-one is trying to stop these tekky threads though ... they're very useful (though perhaps not in the way they were intended).

Genuine warmth and caring and being heard when in need is important, very important ... hubbard (possibly by accident) hit on that very real human need and bastardised it and turned it into something nasty and I like to see it (now) being summarily trashed ... and replaced by something real, love.

:biglove:


 

Gadfly

Crusader
Study TROM.

I just read 3 or 4 pages from "THE PHILOSOPHY OF TROM AND LEVELS 2, 3 AND 4 RESEARCH NOTES", and so far my reaction is:

:puke2:

This guy actually WRITES like Hubbard, with all the vague generalities, posturing and repetitive BS. All of you out there, read this, and WHO does it come across as?

The other morning I heard on the radio there, I heard—they were talking about American society, and the chap he said that one thing about the Americans, he said…he said there they are, he said they’ve got…two per cent of the American population are winning, and they’re all billionaires; the other ninety-eight per cent of the society are losers and they haven’t got much at all, he says, and the whole society are armed to the teeth. Now, he said, what the Yanks can’t see is that that’s a recipe for disaster. Well, the man who said that is quite right. But the Yank can’t see it.

They still persist on running their society on the basis of two per cent winners, ninety-eight per cent losers and everyone carrying a gun. Well, it’s a recipe for disaster. You see that?

But only if you’re sane can you see it. If you happen to be fixated into the goals ‘to exploit’ and the goals ‘to profit’—and they’re all unerasable goals—, if you happen to be fixated on those goals, like the Yanks are, then you’ll never get your society straight, you see. The society just runs itself into the ground.


First, WHO says the billionaires are winners and the rest are losers? I live in America. I don't think that. I don't know ANYONE who thinks that!

I haven't got much, but I am very happy. I don't need or want "much".

Who persists on running the society "on the basis of two per cent winners, ninety-eight per cent losers and everyone carrying a gun"? I don't carry a gun. I don't know anyone else who carries a gun (except my neighbor who is a local cop). Cripes, "profit" and "exploitation" have been prime motives of various peoples in various countries since time immemorial. That is not at all unique to "America" (which is itself a HUGE vague abstract generality).

This guy already sounds too much like Hubbard and like a big ass clown to me. It seems some of you want more Hubbard, and found it with this guy. :ohmy:

But I will give him a chance. I will download and read ALL of it, as long as it is not over 200-300 pages long. I will read it carefully. I suppose I will have to try some of it too, to be fair.

Here is another random example. Read it. It is posturing noise just like Hubbard:

"Now that’s a very, very important philosophical datum, that is. It’s a survival datum. It’s more than just something that you sit around and idly talk about in the coffee shops, you know. It’s something which is raw survival in this universe. Basing your life upon an unerasable goals package is a death sentence in this universe. It’s a death sentence. It really is. I couldn’t stress it more strongly; couldn’t stress it more strongly."

This tendency to add all this extraneous commentary, that was so common with Hubbard, well, this guy does the same crap. I got annoyed with it with Hubbard, and after 3 pages I am already annoyed with it as far as this guy is concerned.

But, I might be wrong . . . . . :confused2:

Note: I immediately saw why and how people who are stuck with various Scientology notions would be attracted to this guy. My first impression is that he is a bullshitter just like Hubbard - of course, it seems that he learned from a master.

He goes on to say this:

"The goals package is ‘to reason’, ‘to not reason’, ‘to be reasoned’, ‘to not be reasoned. That is the ‘to reason’ goals package. Because that is a beautiful little goals package, and it should belong…it belongs on the main list, and you should add it to the main list; and it’s a specific one.

The whole subject of reason and logic becomes an absolute joy after you’ve erased that goals package, where prior to the erasure of that goals package logic and reason can be a very mysterious subject. But the whole subject of logic and reason becomes an absolute joy like poetry after you’ve erased that goals package."


That is fine and well, but what about all of the great many Scientologists and Scientology types who NEVER adequately studied logic or philosophy (reasoning) in the first place, and who don't feel any need to do so (since Hubbard alienated them from the subject). This is hogwash. If you want to get good at logic and reasoning, STUDY LOGIC & REASONING! That somehow you will magically understand it better with such a process is nonsense. This is like M1 crap, where you will "better understand subjects" after completing M1. Again, if you want to understand a subject well, STUDY THE SUBJECT WELL! :duh:

This crap just kills me. :omg:

And, yep, he is going to also make a better world! The world according to TROM.

"On an educational basis, we simply have to discover the unerasable goals packages, and we simply educate children in school, tell them that...and give them the technical reasons why, that you can’t get involved in this activity.

It’s no good—tell the kids—it’s no good going around and hating; no good going around and destroying; it’s no good going around and exploiting; it’s no good going around and profiting. All these are unerasable things; they’ll kill you.

We can’t run a society that way. And we can prove it. And here it is—teacher writes it all up on the blackboard. He teaches them TROM. There it all is. The children can test it in their own minds, and see it’s all there. You see that?

There’s the philosophy on an educational level. You could teach this to people. It could be taught at schools.

Then our society would start to come off it."


Don't you just love the Hubbard-type METAPHORS . . . .

"Then our society would start to come off it."

Can anyone say VAGUE and ABSTRACT? Okay, PROVE IT! You said you can prove it, so please do so. Gawd, this guy tosses out claims and assertions in pure Hubbard style. Endless yap-yap-yap.
 
Last edited:

Spirit

just another son of God
Gladfly,
TROM is less than 100 pages long. Dennis Stephens may come across as more Hubbard, but I think once you read it over you will see the simplicity of it. Scn is a maze, a clusterfuck without a map. TROM is based on 4 postulates that are addressed after mastering timebreaking. It is faster and better than Scn and it is always run solo, requiring no one but oneself and it is FUN and FREE.
 

Gadfly

Crusader
Gladfly,
TROM is less than 100 pages long. Dennis Stephens may come across as more Hubbard, but I think once you read it over you will see the simplicity of it. Scn is a maze, a clusterfuck without a map. TROM is based on 4 postulates that are addressed after mastering timebreaking. It is faster and better than Scn and it is always run solo, requiring no one but oneself and it is FUN and FREE.

Like I said, I will check it out.

I wasn't talking so much about the details of WHAT he was saying, but HOW he says it. Lots of posturing, vague generalities, claims, etc.
 

Leon

Gold Meritorious Patron
Gladfly,
TROM is less than 100 pages long. Dennis Stephens may come across as more Hubbard, but I think once you read it over you will see the simplicity of it. Scn is a maze, a clusterfuck without a map. TROM is based on 4 postulates that are addressed after mastering timebreaking. It is faster and better than Scn and it is always run solo, requiring no one but oneself and it is FUN and FREE.

OK? Just for a start?
 

Spirit

just another son of God
The one thing nearly all of us have in common is that we're ex-members of the Church of Scientology, and that's why we're here; because we have a shared experience that affected us in one way or another and which we want to talk about.

Beyond that, we're a disparate bunch with widely divergent views on a lot of things, including the Scientology tech itself, and that's inevitably going to be reflected in the discussions we have here.

A confession on my part; my experience of the CoS was doing a couple of courses at a smallish and comparatively insignificant org at the back end of beyond. I'd never heard of most or indeed any of the Scn bigwigs who get discussed here at great length (not even David Miscavige, though he was head honcho during my time there) and so I admit I find a lot of the discussion here about them almost insufferably tedious. Marty Rathbun - who the hell was he? Why should I even care what he does or doesn't do?
Just an addendum there; on a more general level I am glad about the fact that people who have participated in and even enabled some of the CofS's abuses and ripoffs are beginning to wake up and speak out about what they witnessed and were a part of; beyond that though, it's like following daily events inside the Vatican, of intense interest to a few people but very little to most of us.
I can relate to what you are saying. It is not that I do not have empathy for the victims, but I have no personal experience of such incidents.The only abuses I witnessed were some out of control reg cycles, which pale by comparison to other abuses. Could not care less about Marty, DM and the CofS bigshots.
 

Cat's Squirrel

Gold Meritorious Patron
Lol, you really shouldn't keep talking about the OP like that Leon (oh, go on then).

Dianetics was only ever 'created' to make hubbard feel and appear superior way back in the 50's after he had been outed as a conman, a liar and a person with mental issues. He was anything but a person most would have placed their own physical, mental or spiritual health with had they known the truth back then (Veda posts dox regularly on hubbard from that time period) ... hubbard used his 'tek' as the basis upon which he built his business/cult, it was the glue used to suck people in and as soon as possible (after as much cash as possible had been extracted) these people were utilised elsewhere and their 'case' was flicked off as irrelevant, hubbard was 'acquiring heaps of money and (probably) smoking fat cigars' as miscavige now is, that's how cults work.

The 'tek' was and is more about hubbard, the auditor and his e-meter than it ever was about the 'PC' ... the 'PC' was needed to provide money and success stories for cult growth (staff very quickly learned that 'PC's' were a necessary pain in the arse).

These tekky threads would be fine (though a bit sad) if there were not people reading them here who are still caught up in the original con working at dissolving the glue that sucked them in, in the first place ... the 'tek'.

No-one is trying to stop these tekky threads though ... they're very useful (though perhaps not in the way they were intended).

Genuine warmth and caring and being heard when in need is important, very important ... hubbard (possibly by accident) hit on that very real human need and bastardised it and turned it into something nasty and I like to see it (now) being summarily trashed ... and replaced by something real, love.

:biglove:



But is warmth and caring enough, as opposed to also knowing what to say and when?

You must have known in your own life (as I have in mine) people who tried to listen and help when you had a problem but weren't able to, and you ended up feeling no better (or even worse) than you did before. Quite often what comes over is their own fear of the situation you're describing to them, so you both end up in the same quagmire as you alone were in before. Or, you can talk on and on and feel worse because your attention isn't being directed to the root of the problem or a remedy for it.

On the other hand, as I've said before on here I had a housemate at university who was Catholic and had a big win once on going to confession. That priest (whoever he was) most likely hadn't studied a word of Ron's Tech, but nevertheless he clearly did something right, and I'd like to know what.

My only interest in participating in these discussions is to help figure out what works and what doesn't, by sharing ideas and experiences with others. Love, warmth and caring are great but they're not the whole story IMO.
 
Last edited:
Don't be a grumpy Ant, Ant .... just go to 'settings' then 'edit profile' and finally 'custom user title' and type what you want directly into the little box ... (or try just leaving it blank?) and remember to hit 'save changes' at the very bottom of the page.
:)

Wow! I ain't grumpy no more. Thanks. See what I am now? (I hope it appears to the left of this message.)
a happy Ant

Result of later editing. I changed from Patron with Honors, to Commoner without manners. When I discovered that this went on previous post I tried to change to the more neutral sign for a thetan, but when could not produce Symbol text I settled for just Commoner. What a waste of time when there is an interesting exchange of views and viewpoints going on . Ant
 
Last edited:

I told you I was trouble

Suspended animation
But is warmth and caring enough, as opposed to also knowing what to say and when?

You must have known in your own life (as I have in mine) people who tried to listen and help when you had a problem but weren't able to, and you ended up feeling no better (or even worse) than you did before. Quite often what comes over is their own fear of the situation you're describing to them, so you both end up in the same quagmire as you alone were in before. Or, you can talk on and on and feel worse because your attention isn't being directed to the root of the problem or a remedy for it.

On the other hand, as I've said before on here I had a housemate at university who was Catholic and had a big win once on going to confession. That priest (whoever he was) most likely hadn't studied a word of Ron's Tech, but nevertheless he clearly did something right, and I'd like to know what.

My only interest in participating in these discussions is to help figure out what works and what doesn't, by sharing ideas and experiences with others. Love, warmth and caring are great but they're not the whole story IMO.


No, of course they're not the whole story but what story are you trying to address? It sounds as if therapy may be what you're looking for.

Many people don't have major issues to handle when they get involved in scientology, but they're very quickly given some ... they're handed a whole bridge to climb only to find that they 'mocked it all up' at a couple of key levels ('clear' being the first). They didn't 'mock it all up' though ... hubbard did.

Real problems need real solutions and I'm not trying to downplay that but most everyday issues can be resolved without therapy and that's what I meant earlier.

Auditing isn't therapy, ask any auditor (they don't like to be called therapists ... or faux therapists either, funnily enough). Auditing is one on one attention though, which I think is what many people get addicted to ... and whatever 'cognitions' the 'PC' has are acknowledged and 'validated' ... who wouldn't like that (lol)? It isn't therapy though, it's just someone talking and being listened to and made to feel 'right' about whatever realisations or solutions they come up with ... good friends and family do that for each other every day so things don't build up and become too serious and we learn to take care of things ourselves.

I know I'm simplifying ... but I'm not making nothing of people that have issues, we all have them, I just believe they're a normal part of life and true character is built while going through them.

After all the stories and documented facts that have now been exposed ... you're not still a believer in the hubbard concept of 'clear and OT' ... are you?


:)

 

Gadfly

Crusader
These are arbitrary terms, but surely such states of beingness are obtainable.

You can't, or at least shouldn't, say that they are arbitrary terms, and then say that "surely such states of beingness are obtainable".

PLEASE, OH PLEASE, define each first, and then tell me where and how it is obtainable.

I know you believe that something related to these ideas is obtainable.

The state of Clear. Define it.

The state of OT. Define it.

Say clearly what each is, and what each isn't. If these are real things, to even any degree, that exist outside of your own imagination, doing so should be possible

Then let's talk about how, why, and where such might be obtainable.

Otherwise this is all vague and abstract sloppy thinking about who knows what. :confused2:

Or, discard the arbitrary terms, "clear" and "OT", and define and describe these "obtainable states". And, then we can discuss whether or not such states, as defined and described, are obtainable - and to what degree, stability and consistency.
 
Last edited:

Spirit

just another son of God
Defining arbitrary:
Adjective

  1. Based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.
  2. (of power or a ruling body) Unrestrained and autocratic in the use of authority.mply



I do see that I used the wrong term. I should have simply stated that they are labels and left it at that, or said "yes" or, even better, I should have simply left it alone.
 

I told you I was trouble

Suspended animation
Defining arbitrary:
Adjective

  1. Based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.
  2. (of power or a ruling body) Unrestrained and autocratic in the use of authority.mply



I do see that I used the wrong term. I should have simply stated that they are labels and left it at that, or said "yes" or, even better, I should have simply left it alone.


If you had said 'yes' (meaning that you do still believe in the hubbard concept of clear and OT) what is it that you believe they are?
 

PirateAndBum

Gold Meritorious Patron
Like I said, I will check it out.

I wasn't talking so much about the details of WHAT he was saying, but HOW he says it. Lots of posturing, vague generalities, claims, etc.

I suggest you read the book first, not the lecture transcripts. TROM, in my view, is a way of taking the 1st path you posted about a few pages back - to handle all goals. Cut Dennis some slack Gad, he didn't start a cult, he never charged anyone a dime for TROM, he gave it freely to anyone that wished to use it.
 

Gadfly

Crusader
Defining arbitrary:
Adjective

  1. Based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.
  2. (of power or a ruling body) Unrestrained and autocratic in the use of authority.mply



I do see that I used the wrong term. I should have simply stated that they are labels and left it at that, or said "yes" or, even better, I should have simply left it alone.

I am all for discussing such things, as I have an interest in them.

Just define what you are talking about, otherwise, we can't really talk about anything at all.

What are some of these "states"? How would you describe some of them? You don't even need a label. Call them "state 1", "state 2", and so forth, and simply describe each one.

Okay, I will show you what I mean.

I had this experience, which we can call "state 1".

State 1: Viewing the physical universe from a spot, from a point, looking out and "hearing out" from this point, with 360-degree perception. This occurs with no body, and occurs from what we might call "mind" or "spirit". Or, without using any label, this occurs without the aid of any physical sense, yet "you" are "aware", just as you are when associated with a physical body.

So, does this exist? Can it exist? Can it be brought about consistently in people? How often does any person experience this? Can it be controlled? And, on and on.

It happened to me. I am sure of it. I didn't imagine it. It lasted about 15 seconds or so, and it never happened again. I know of many other people who have done LOADS of Scientology services, who NEVER had this experience.

Now, back to definitions. The term "operating thetan" includes the word "operating". That means, when understood along with a great many other things Hubbard said about the state, that this "awareness" that exists invisibly in MEST, yet that can perceive with all the usual sense types as experienced through a body while placing attention on the physical universe, has the ability to LOCATE ITSELF AT WILL within MEST, and to "look out" from that point.

Obviously, most OTs can't even just be there at the point, and perceive clearly and accurately with similar senses as defined by a body. Much less, then move this point around from here to there, perceiving anywhere it wills. I propose that the IDEA ITSELF is lame. I am not saying that somebody might not be able to do it, sooner or later, somewhere, possibly with great amounts of work, but that when fully looked at from all angles, the ability is meaningless! It would ONLY have value to some bozo trying to get an upper edge at beating others in some game where the others did NOT have the same ability (to roam about and acquire MEST information invisibly).

I want to add something here, that displays the notion of OT itself to be ABSURD (at least without various qualifiers). To perceive the world as we do, with the senses we do, requires a certain relative "size" to everything around us in physical terms. We can't perceive the atomic activity of atoms and molecules because in the form we exist as a body, it is all "too big" in comparison. This "in comparison" is a VITAL ingredient, because it is the RELATIONSHIP that defines what and how you see what you see. In a very real sense, a "thetan" (as an awareness unit without a body with the ability to move about and perceive) would have to sort of mock itself up at the gross level of a human body to have the same sort of relationship with the physical universe as it does in a body.

Otherwise, as certain mystics have described, the thetan could or might instead experience the universe on the smallest resolution of atomic activity, or pull out and pervade the entire physical universe and "feel it" at the zoomed out level of resolution (or at any of the infinite gradations in between).

See, it IS all relative. A thetan would have to do a great deal of drilling to be able to "change its own size or nature", so as to be able to "tune into" different levels of resolution of just this physical universe. We aren't even talking yet about the mental universe, the univrese of imagination, or any of a great many OTHER universes.

I could go on and on about this. But lastly, a "spirit" itself has no component of space or time, yet can supposedly position itself or consider itself to exist in some way within some mock-up of space and time. From the viewpoint of a thetan exterior, the possibilities are infinite and any attention or concern for this one ARBITRARY physical universe would be representative of a sort of "mental illness" (obsession on MEST).

I can see the world and universe, and all the worlds and universes, as a spirit, out of time and space, to some degree, and to a large degree I give no added importance to this one current MEST universe. So also, I have little attention on gaining some ability to exist within it, yet without any of it!!!!!!!!! :duh:

For THAT is what the aim to exist "exterior with full perception" involves. One wants to exist in MEST, and to experience (perceive) MEST, yet without the association with a physical body and without any MEST sensory organs. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Plus, it is just a really dumb notion, once you can actually view all of this from the viewpoint of a SPIRIT!

What this involves is mocked up significance. Or as a TROMer might say (I did read a bit), this involves self-created importances. All values and importances are self-created thingies, and they determine HOW you see and experience the world. You consider some of these important, but from the viewpoint of pure spirit, it involves "just another arbitrary self-created importance".
 
Last edited:

Gadfly

Crusader
I suggest you read the book first, not the lecture transcripts. TROM, in my view, is a way of taking the 1st path you posted about a few pages back - to handle all goals. Cut Dennis some slack Gad, he didn't start a cult, he never charged anyone a dime for TROM, he gave it freely to anyone that wished to use it.

I am reading it.

But, as you know, I AM a ruthless "critic" (of all things). :confused2:
 

Spirit

just another son of God


If you had said 'yes' (meaning that you do still believe in the hubbard concept of clear and OT) what is it that you believe they are?
I believe that higher states of being are possible.

Like I said, I should have left this alone...

I am interested in restoring my native spiritual abilities. I am not very concerned with labels such as OT and such and have no desire to defend LRH's terminology.

As for validation of state of clear, that would depend on whether the reactive mind exists. I believe it does and that is erasure or being brought under control is favorable. I know many here will disagree.
 

Spirit

just another son of God
I am all for discussing such things, as I have an interest in them.

Just define what you are talking about, otherwise, we can't really talk about anything at all.

What are some of these "states"? How would you describe some of them? You don't even need a label. Call them "state 1", "state 2", and so forth, and simply describe each one.......
What this involves is mocked up significance. Or as a TROMer might say (I did read a bit), this involves self-created importances. All values and importances are self-created thingies, and they determine HOW you see and experience the world. You consider some of these important, but from the viewpoint of pure spirit, it involves "just another arbitrary self-created importance".
I am on Level 2 of TROM so I have not addressed these importances, yet I do not consider them to be important. I am trying to increase whatever abilities I have and regain those that I have lost and defining them is of little significance or interest to me.
must
EDIT: Along with Level 2, I have been working with the Repair of Importances in Level 1 of TROM. Must be working, for at one time things such as these were of much significance.
 
Last edited:
Top