now that there is some fancy syllogism!
....tries to figure this out....
P1. Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
P2. Love is the Law.
So the conclusion should be;
C. Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of Love.
which is different from saying that Love should be under Will, because if it was, "do what thou wilt" would be under Will as well, which doesn't make sense. So I don't think it is a syllogism.