The Daily Mail (xenu bless them) has been covering Cruise rather extensively lately. Here is their latest:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...pion-Jeff-Gordon-star-studded-Vegas-bash.html
The Daily Mail always has a lot of good photos.
In one photo, Cruise looks like he's towering over Jeff Gordon, when in reality Gordon (5'8") is probably a half inch taller, although probably not wearing heels.
I can't wait until Cruise is about 63 and his Botoxed souffle-face starts to collapse. When he smiles, his cheeks look like they're inflated or full of nuts.
So is Cruise there because Vegas is such a holy place for clams, or Cruise is pandering to the NASCAR fans and sponsors, or he's hoping to get the Dianutty car back into the game? It seems like with a lot of Cruise films, such as Top Gun or Days of Thunder, he has to pretend he has a huge interest in these things, for his image and as promotional tie-ins for the film. Yeah, he's a big supporter of the military, flying, cars, romance, bromance, and everything except for maybe cocktails. Even for Valkyrie, Cruise had to show how anti-Nazi he is, which means for him, anti-Scientology critic.
It makes you wonder if he ever considers why a successful movie can't be made based on either the fiction or scientific philosophy of L. Ron Hubbard. There can be no story of a Scientologist, or even have one introduced as a character in anything, or it would be a farce.
Scientology can't do a movie about David Miscavige and all his defecting family members, putting underlings in the Hole, and disappearing his wife. A real biography of Hubbard was not possible to produce, so they finally came out with the pictorial Nutterpedia. It wasn't possible to write about Hubbard's wives, family or important tomato research. So the most important thing about Scientology is Tom Cruise and the movies he makes and how big a star he is.