What's new

Debbie Cook responds to SP times (Tampa Bay Times)

Emma

Con te partirò
Administrator
Debbie has sent an email to the SP times, clarifying her New Years Eve email.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/scientology/article1209547.ece

Debbie Cook, the high-profile Scientologist who on New Year's Eve launched a surprise effort to reform the Church of Scientology's aggressive fundraising practices, has renewed her call for action but insists she's not picking a fight with the church.

In a letter released to the Tampa Bay Times, Cook again rallies individual Scientologists, calling on them to do their part in restoring the church to the way its founder L. Ron Hubbard wanted it to run.

"This is the responsibility that every Scientologist has," she wrote.

Cook referred to her Dec. 31 e-mail, which urged thousands of Scientologists to stand up against incessant demands for money common in today's church. The e-mail said the church under leader David Miscavige was too focused on posh buildings and was keeping more than $1 billion in reserve instead of spending it to spread the religion.

It also said Miscavige had effectively dismantled the internal checks and balances that were supposed to prevent the church from being led by a single person.

The church's intense focus on fundraising was detailed by the Times in November in a four-part investigative series titled "The Money Machine.'' It revealed church leaders pressure staffers to meet weekly fundraising targets. As a result, many resort to coercive and deceitful tactics and many parishioners go deeply into debt so they can pay the church.
Cook's e-mail and follow-up letter constitute one of the most significant challenges to Miscavige's authority since he took power in 1986 after Hubbard's death. But Cook said she intended only to help the church.

Cook, 50, was the top authority for 17 years at the Clearwater church, the most revered Scientology spiritual center anywhere.

She became a Scientologist as a teenager in her native North Carolina and joined the church staff in Clearwater at age 17.

Today, she and her husband, former church staffer Wayne Baumgarten, live San Antonio, Texas, where they own and run a business services company. They left the church's religious order in 2007 but remain devoted Scientologists.

In her New Year's Eve message, Cook portrayed herself as a fellow parishioner in good standing who became so deeply concerned about the direction the church was taking she felt compelled to act.

Numerous media organizations in the U.S. and abroad have carried her story.
Church officials did not respond to the Times' requests for comment on Jan. 1. But in statements to media organizations who picked up the story later, they say Cook is not a church insider.

In statements to USA Today and Good Morning America, the church said Cook is a "disgruntled defector," an "apostate" who can't be believed and a "squirrel," a Scientology term for heretic.

On Friday, the Times provided portions of the letter to the church. Asked to respond, church spokeswoman Karin Pouw said, "The church cannot respond to a letter it has not seen ... nor would it ever be appropriate to do so via the Times."

Cook's latest communication appears directed to practicing Scientologists as well as media. She makes clear she misjudged media reaction to her e-mail. She also seeks to amplify her devotion to Hubbard and her support for the church, even as she pushes for reform.
Here is Debbies Email:

My name is Debbie Cook. Your publication just wrote about my New Year's Eve email to some of our Scientologist friends – church insiders – and included the full text of the email.

Someone else turned around and sent this letter to thousands of Scientologists – news articles are reporting 12,000 – and from there, you published it and other media outlets sensationalized it further. My email was no doubt tough reading for outsiders, as it quoted liberally and invoked duties from our own church policies and organizations.

Such matters are of paramount interest to Scientologists, but of no interest to the general public. Unfortunately this left various media to seize upon certain points that might titillate a public without a real understanding of the church, while downplaying the main point, which is my love for Scientology and my passion for it as laid out in the pure principles and guidance from L. Ron Hubbard.

I am not trying to pick a fight with the Church, nor am I bitter, or blasting or any of the other things concocted by other media outlets. I am simply asking my friends to do their part, the part that Mr. Hubbard asked of all Scientologists, which is to make sure that they only follow the workable technology laid out in policy and bulletins written by Hubbard exactly as he wrote them. This is the responsibility every Scientologist has – to keep it unadulterated.

This is the very reason I didn't want this in the press. All you got wind of was some internal group pressure to keep things on the straight and narrow. It was clearly intended as a communication amongst Scientologists.

I have been a Scientologist for 36 years. My experience of meeting and working with Scientologists all over the world is that they are truly good-hearted, ethical and caring people.

The staff of Scientology organizations work very hard, long hours to service and help anyone who walks in their doors.

Scientology organizations provide services that help people with their problems and improve conditions in one's life. Whether that is drug addiction or alcohol abuse, marital problems, school problems, kid problems, work related stress or pretty much any of life's twists and turns.

In most cases the reason Scientologists donate to the Church or even dedicate their lives to working for the Church is because their lives have been truly touched and they have been profoundly helped through the application of technology laid out by Mr. Hubbard.

Scientologists are active in community service, with community clean-ups, Winter Wonderland, adopting streets, planting trees, working with the Fire Dept as emergency response. At pretty much any natural disaster anywhere in the world you will find Scientologists as Volunteer Ministers there on the scene helping in any way they can. These and many other incredibly good things that Scientologists are involved in are the reason we care so much.
 
G

Gottabrain

Guest
Sounds like she's regurgitating a PR statement from COS. Not that anyone from OSA has been in contact with her or anything... :shark:

But they've already labeled her a squirrel and heretic, the media splash has been done, doubts have been planted and only a small percentage of Deb's FB friends have practiced disconnection. It doesn't appear other networks are interested in her watered down, now-I'm-promoting-Scientology-like-a-good-girl follow-up to the original email, either.

Business as usual, folks.

2012 has gotten off to a good start. Anons & Ex's got every bit of mileage out of her original email and the world is much more aware of the scam of Scientology. :clap::clap::clap: Ex's and Anons ROCK. :rock:

I'm onto exposing the financial scams of COS & the IAS and some of its key IAS
supporters here http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?25831-WHO-is-Donating-These-Huge-Sums-to-IAS-Info-Needed. Anyone with an RE license in Calif that wants to help me with research, please pm me. Anybody who has some scammy factual background on any of the big IAS supporters or wants to research one of the names, please PM me as well. Links to the lists of IAS supporters are on that thread. Just pick one. :yes:

Not sure what we'll do this coming week to top the Debbie Cook email, but we'll come up with something. We always do. :coolwink:

:carryon:
 

teadreamer

Patron
I think that it would be great if Scientologists could be asked to vote for who they want to lead the church, DM or Debbie. Then when Debbie gets the winning vote she could put everything back on policy as per the original email and maybe DM could spend some time on the RPF.
 

Type4_PTS

Diamond Invictus SP
I think that it would be great if Scientologists could be asked to vote for who they want to lead the church, DM or Debbie. Then when Debbie gets the winning vote she could put everything back on policy as per the original email and maybe DM could spend some time on the RPF.

Teadreamer,
Welcome to ESMB! :thumbsup:

What policy is it where Hubbard speaks about the members voting for who they want to run their organization? :unsure:
 

Mystic

Crusader
My Gawhd! Ms. Cook confesses to having been a "Scientologist" for 36 years. Thirty-six years and she still suffers from Hubbardosis, a dissociative disease of personality. How many incarnations to evolve out of that dissociative, vampire-victim level of personality?
 

RogerB

Crusader
Seems to me she is playing a masterful hand in all of this :biggrin:

How can the innies fault her based on that email? :no:

Yet, she is on course to bring significant changes to the cult . . . . even if those changes are only getting innies sticking to "standard tech" and refusing to cough up $$$'s and getting pissed at abuse and leaving.

Yum, Yum.

I like this girl more and more

RogerB
 

Free to shine

Shiny & Free
Your publication just wrote about my New Year's Eve email to some of our Scientologist friends – church insiders – and included the full text of the email.

Someone else turned around and sent this letter to thousands of Scientologists – news articles are reporting 12,000 – and from there, you published it and other media outlets sensationalized it further.

I'd like to know what that's about....is this just a cover-up from OSA having 'handled her" or is it true?
 

Lulu Belle

Moonbat
Seems to me she is playing a masterful hand in all of this :biggrin:

How can the innies fault her based on that email? :no:

Actually, I agree with Roger here.

I don't think her response has anything to do with OSA (not that they haven't been working her over, I'm sure).

I think that her original intent was to address on-line Scientologist OTs and this is her way of reiterating that.
 

Sindy

Crusader
IMHO she should have left well enough alone but, whatev. She shouldn't look like she is groveling, wavering, apprehensive, concerned, worried, or anything else -- not even slightly.
 

Mirele

Patron
Reposting to a more appropriate thread (so yeah, you may have seen this previously).


This second letter is interesting. Here's a few thoughts, not necessarily in any order.

1) It appears that there might be some butt-covering going on. Debbie is trying to give the impression that she sent the original e-mail to "some" people, but certainly not "12,000" people. She's trying to give the impression that the e-mail got spread around, but not by her. There's a couple of things that don't seem to fit.

* The letter hit a lot of Scientologists at once, it was not spread through the grapevine as one might have expected. The impact was in a matter of hours, not days or weeks.

* The letter asks people to forward it on to other Scns, but not to send it outside. (Personally, I think Debbie was highly naive if she thought there wasn't one or more Scns who wouldn't spread the letter far and wide.)

I'm half thinking that Debbie might be engaging in some plausible deniability here. She \recruited people to send the letter to originally, with the expectation that these recipients would, in turn, send it out to others, but she didn't (and doesn't) have the information (e-mail addresses) that her original recipients had. There are legal reasons why she might want to give this impression.

2) This letter is obviously NOT an amends project.

* She doesn't apologize for her harshness in getting down on the excesses of regging for everything except services.

* She doesn't apologize to Little Napoleon.

* She still holds the same position as before and she wants to go back to the purity of LRH's religion.

Given that the (unnamed) cult attorney quoted on GMA today stepped up the attack on Debbie by calling her an apostate, short of absolutely crawling back to DM, she's not going to get back into DM's Scn. And then she'd be sent to the Hole.

I think the letter, while addressed to the press, and while referring to "Mr. Hubbard", actually has a second audience, those Scns who might be on the fence but are offended that Scn dirty laundry is being aired in public. However, as I am a never Scn, never been in a Church of Scientology, I could be totally wrong.
 

Smilla

Ordinary Human
She'd have to be totally ignorant about the way that the internet works, to believe that her original email wouldn't go viral, and I don't think she is. So what is she up to? Restating her love of Hubbard, Scientology, and Scientologists, yes, but what else?
 

Sindy

Crusader
She'd have to be totally ignorant about the way that the internet works, to believe that her original email wouldn't go viral, and I don't think she is. So what is she up to? Restating her love of Hubbard, Scientology, and Scientologists, yes, but what else?

Forcing the issue? Forcing the C of S to continue to make themselves look like irrational idiots? :confused2:
 

lotus

stubborn rebel sheep!
Dont't forget she has to manage the whole situation and medias
accordingly to not be in breach with her legal agreement with CO$

She makes herself appear as not wanting this media attention and being not reponsible for this media coverage- but uses the opportunity to reinforce her message to current members while praising the scientology religion and it's founder.

Well done.

I am certain she is getting very good help as any moove she made is carefully and wisely prepared.
 
Dont't forget she has to manage the whole situation and medias
accordingly to not be in breach with her legal agreement with CO$

She makes herself appear as not wanting this media attention and being not reponsible for this media coverage- but uses the opportunity to reinforce her message to current members while praising the scientology religion and it's founder.

Well done.

I am certain she is getting very good help as any moove she made is carefully and wisely prepared.

Yes, but she is now getting into the area of "Everytime I open my pure saintly mouth I get deeper in the shit. How is that happening, when I am so theta in my postulates"? IMO :)
 

Boojuum

Silver Meritorious Patron
OMG Debbie, Debbie, Debbie...get a frigging life.

She's now in the phase: "it's just bad management that is making Scientology horrible."

No Debbie, you area re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, you are trying to polish a turd.

LRon loved that you have devoted 37 years of your life to him and would eagerly let you devote the next billion or so years to him.


Scientology is heavy regging.
Scientology severely punishes any percieved mistakes.
Scientology sucks the life and money out of it's most dedicated followers.


The public that reads the St. Pete Times thinks that you and your fellow Scientologists are wacko, deluded, nuts, crackers. I concur.
 
Top