ESMB has entered archive mode. All posts and threads that were available to the general public are still readable. The board is still searchable. 

Thank you all for your participation and readership over the last 12 years.

If you want to join in the conversation, please join the new ESMB Redux at

Debbie's lawyer looking for help from Dave's victims

Discussion in 'Debbie Cook' started by Mimsey Borogrove, Mar 4, 2012.

  1. Smurf

    Smurf Gold Meritorious SP

    The DBZ has initiated some strict guidelines prohibiting "doxing". Miranda probably removed it because the $$ spent on legal fees is not for public consumption. The cult has already ordered Debbie's attorney to retain all documents pertaining to the fundraising incurred for Deb's defense fund.

    Marty, who started the fund, told the cult to fuck off, that he would not release the name of the donors & how much money each contributed to the fund. As far back as I can remember, the cult paid particular attention to who was contributing money to people in cases adverse to the cult, so they could track down & harass those contributors.

    At my hearing with the City Attorney last year, when Kirstie Alley & her Scilon friends tried to have me charged with harassment for filming the Grand Opening of her failed endeavor, Organic Liaison, Moxon demanded, and threatened to get a court order, to know how much I was paying my attorney to defend me. I told him if he got on his knees and blew me, I'd tell him.

    I don't ever recall a judge demanding a defendant in a civil case adverse to Scientology, to surrender their list of contributors.
  2. Lulu Belle

    Lulu Belle Moonbat

  3. TheRealNoUser

    TheRealNoUser Patron with Honors

    If Debbie really wants to prove that Scientology held her against her will and intimidated her, all she has to do is to reveal the truth of what she knows about Lisa McPherson.

    Lisa was held against her will for 17 days until she died. Debbie Cook knows exactly what went on that led to Lisa's death. She could prove that Scientology has a history of holding people against their will, and that Lisa's story made her fearful for her own life. This would open up the Lisa story again and allow the truth to finally come out in a court of law. (Even though we all know what that truth is already)

    Does Debbie Cook really have the personal integrity that she purports to have? Or is this appeal for help really just another selfish Scientologist out to save their own skin, and gather even more free money from others?
  4. RogerB

    RogerB Crusader

    Then if all that's true . . .and I don't have the time nor interest to get into your kind of nit-picking shit . . . then R&R should make it plain what they are trying to accomplish and not put out a misleading dictate that has lead to one person, at least as shown above, to decline to contribute because she/he "does not match all the points" of the R&R prescription.

    I am pointing out that Miscavage is currently not part of the proceedings . . . no matter how much we wish he were . . . .

    If R&R want to embroil him in it, then they would be wiser to declare that strategy by announcing "here is our opportunity" so let's use it.

    But instead they are silly enough to put it as part of an emphasis that ought or must be included in submitted depositions . . . . that is dull because it tends to KO valid submissions.

    But here you are again intellectualizing about what you "suspect" . . . why can't you just stick to the simple facts of the issue at hand?

    My statement that all who have evidence to back up Debbie's case should submit it regardless of whether or not it implicates Miscavage directly, contrary to R&R's verbiage, is ignored by you . . . . well I suppose that is one way of ignoring proper orders of importance :duh:

  5. Lone Star

    Lone Star Crusader

    Regardless of details or speculation, I have had a gut feeling for a while now that Marty is going to somehow screw up this case for Debbie. Hopefully not in a critical way, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least if he creates a setback that Debbie's lawyer will have to overcome. That's the last thing her lawyer will need. He's got enough on his plate.

    After Marty came out with his call for people to step forward and write testimonials, my gut feeling got stronger. Especially when I read that he wanted these people to send their testimonials to either himself or Rinder. I just see potential trouble with this. A footbullet in the making.

    Now I may be off base and DC's attorney either asked MR to do this, or he approved it after MR offered to help. We'll see...
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2012
  6. Terril park

    Terril park Sponsor

    There is this:-

    J. Swift | March 4, 2012 at 9:52 pm | Reply

    In a 2008 article on Andrew Morton’s book on Tom Cruise, a question was asked if TC was second in command of the Church. Elliot Abelson replied:

    “Mr Abelson denied the actor was ‘second in command’.

    “He is a parishioner, a well respected parishioner, but that’s what he is. The only person who runs the Church and makes policy decisions is David Miscavige.”


    Elliot Abelson has already admitted that DM is in charge. Any affidavits that document duress are buttressed by Abelson’s own remarks.
  7. Lone Star

    Lone Star Crusader

    That is a great quote...potentially damaging. Forward it to Marty, er, I mean Debbie's attorney.
  8. Mark A. Baker

    Mark A. Baker Sponsor

    So? Don't. Just because my mind works that way is no reason you have to respond in kind. I find it useful. Not everyone shares that view.

    I doubt there will be much plain speaking from Rathbun & Associates, at least not of the 'truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth' variety. It doesn't seem to be their forte. They appear to prefer expurgated versions.

    Well, absent transcripts of any strategy planning sessions involving the lawyers, rathbun & cook, facts on hand such as they are are remarkably scant. As you have indicated what facts there are indicate that they wish to corral Miscavige specifically into this case. You already pointed out that raises the question of 'why' since for the simple purpose of making Cook's case it appears to be a bit of a side issue. That question invites speculation based on what is known. My remarks were clearly labeled as speculation on that point.

    As you indicate what matters for her case is the fact of coercion by church representatives. Direct implication of Miscavige as having been personally involved is not essential to achieving that purpose.

    Hardly ignored. I simply had nothing to add to your remark. I regarded it as quite apt. A failure to comment on my part need not denote disagreement.

    My prior remarks in response to yours serve only as one hypothetical interpretation of events. Nothing more. Time & circumstance may chance to illuminate more.

    Mark A. Baker
  9. HelluvaHoax!

    HelluvaHoax! Platinum Meritorious Sponsor with bells on

    Agreed. But as you well know, there is often the case proper and ALSO le grande subtext of jockeying for position in the likelihood of a settlement prior to trial.

    The leverage in favor of Debbie's case vs COS is two-fold:

    * proof of coercion (which does involve Miscavige directly and indirectly)

    * the terror factor (which would compel Miscavige to do anything to avoid getting pulled into discovery or testifying under oath in a trial, where cross-examination and impeachment documents/witnesses are forthcoming.) ​

    A safe assumption is that the obligatory motion for Summary Judgment will be dismissed for obvious reasons. What then remains is the path leading to trial and the opening of Pandoras "Case" so to speak.

    Ultimately, history teaches that the downfall of despots and demons is often playing their own strengths against them, in Jujitsu fashion. Miscavige's billion dollar bullying has inexorably led him into this ill-fated showdown. Whether or not Debbie/Marty orchestrated it intentionally in order to bait COB into an ambush is not clear.

    But either way, I would expect Miscavige cut bait and dock his boat at the nearest port and safely walk ashore. How he will try to save face in doing so should be quite fascinating.
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2012
  10. Rene Descartes

    Rene Descartes Gold Meritorious Patron

    After seeing this I would insane cackle for 5 minutes except I value my gonads and will have to suppress the insane cackle till tomorrow as my wife is sound asleep and to wake her with an insane cackle would be the same as a self inflicted gonad bullet upon both mine own 'nads.

  11. Boomima

    Boomima Patron with Honors

    So, Marty who is on record as admitting that he was physically abusive to staff and Sea Org while he was in the CoS is gathering proof of abuse to give to Debbie's lawyers? But this proof is only to be about DM?

    So, if someone had testimony that say...Marty abused them but said that DM told him to would he be interested in that?

    Aside from a pathological desire to be the center of attention while proving that he's better than anyone with the initials DM, is there a good reason why Marty is the one gathering these statements?

    Indie Scientologists are more confusing that the other kind. I think that I will go examine Ron Org instead.
  12. HelluvaHoax!

    HelluvaHoax! Platinum Meritorious Sponsor with bells on

    A quizzical anomaly, ain't it?

    I find it hard to plot them on the map, exactly.

    To be (do/have) KSW or not, that is the question.

    Perhaps, I need to solve a Zen Koan to understand Indies:

    "What is the sound of one foot(bullet) flapping?"
  13. scooter

    scooter Gold Meritorious Patron

    You are presuming there is some sanity in what Pope Dave does.:omg:

    I don't believe that the events of Debbie's trial support such a supposition.:coolwink:

    Debbie's lawyer AND Rathbun publicly say what Debbie's gonna talk about prior to the hearing, yet Pope Dave goes ahead. Then pulls the pin at the end of the first day bawwwwwing about how Debbie has hijacked His courtcase against her.:duh:

    Now an appeal for a Summary Judgement that is pretty likely to fail AND bring up even more evidence against that that Pope Dave doesn't want to see the light of day PLUS it's given Rathbun the chance to ask for anyone abused by DM to come forward and sign an affidavit about it which will just enlarge the scope of the case against DM:happydance:

    None of this is the mark of a person possessed with any hinderance of sanity in Their quest for Planetary Domination ... er Clearing.:no:

    Dave doing the sane thing and cutting and running? :roflmao:

    Hoaxie, this is one of the best jests you've ever pulled. :hysterical:

    Dave will be thinking about that just around the time He's being bent over and having His orange jumpsuit removed by several large inmates - and He'll be trying to find someone else to blame for Him not taking that option.:dieslaughing:

    Hey Dave :shark: - get used to the feeling.
  14. Mark A. Baker

    Mark A. Baker Sponsor

    I wouldn't make too much of the church having filed a Request for Summary Judgement, Scoot. They are pretty routine tactically whether an attorney considers it likely the judge will grant or not. It's regarded as a low risk, quick, quiet way to seek a 'win'. There's no real penalty if its not granted and relatively cheap to file.

    Not much down side, reasonable prospect for success. It would be more surprising if the church had withheld from filing it.

    Mark A. Baker
  15. Rene Descartes

    Rene Descartes Gold Meritorious Patron

    Let's compare two scenarios with a cost to beenfit analysis

    Scenario 1. File a Summary Judgement. Cost? estimate 33 pages of paper at $800 per hour. Estimate 10 hours to prepare such statement. Cost to file? estimate $400 Court costs for sumary judgement hearing? $500. Lawyer fees for Summary Jugment Hearing? $2,000.Expected probability of win? Comservative Estimate 1 out of a trillion.

    Scenario 2. Buy a Powerball ticket. Cost $2, no estimate, true cost. Expected probability of win. approx. 1 in 80 million.

    Expected loss

    Scenario 1 $ 10,899.99999999999999999999999

    Scenario 2 $1.999999999999

    Ahh the old Master Card punchline


    I'm not goign to say they should not have filed but if the Pope on a Rope is hoping for something goodto come out of it he better be making plans for the next step.

    If I could find the right sports scenario to use as an analogy I would write it but thsi is difficult because sports involves some elements of luck that a courtroom probably can't locate.

    The only way a sports analogy might stand up is if we enter the word "payoff" into the foray.

    Last edited: Mar 6, 2012
  16. Freeminds

    Freeminds Bitter defrocked apostate

    To KSW, somebody will first have to GSW... and nobody ever has got Scientology working. Unless it's meant to be nothing more than a pyramid scam, that is. In that case, it's still working... sort of.
  17. Jump

    Jump Operating teatime

    Funny movie parody from wwp...

  18. LA SCN

    LA SCN NOT drinking the kool-aid

    A good shoop is worth a thousand words! :hysterical:
  19. LA SCN

    LA SCN NOT drinking the kool-aid

    To dream the impossible dream...

    (Davey, big ol' boy Cletus, prison bars, bent over, white knuckles gripping, "double or nothing, bitch"...) :coolwink:
  20. HelluvaHoax!

    HelluvaHoax! Platinum Meritorious Sponsor with bells on

    That is so perfect.

    This is the granddaddy of all "assumptive closes".

    Nobody ever thinks to ask when it is going to start working because Hubbard drills it into people 24/7 that they must keep it working. LOL

    That is a stage illusion, personified, with misdirection and the audience thinking that real magic has happened.

    Then the audience applauds Hubbard for defrauding them and taking their money.

    Finally the audience leaves the theater, laughing & congratulating each other about how they are the top 1% of all the people in the world who were able enough to find that magician and witness a miracle.

    Nice trick.