Disinfected
Patron Meritorious
Yes, I have been summarily declared by Marty. Is that an honor? Can I get Goldenrod on it?
Marty refused to post my somewhat tongue-in-cheek comment on the fact that perks for Cruise and COB align with LRH policy. That comment is posted below.
After deleting it two or three times, Marty did reply to my protest with "you are ncg."
"ncg" as most of us know here is "No Case Gain" and is somewhat of a shorthand for "Suppressive Person".
Marty and crew have no problem continuing the grand tradition of labelling and discarding anyone that will not toe the line. PTS, Type A - J, theety-weety, dilettante, middle-class, wog, db (degraded being), SP, ncg, out-ethics, nattery, etc., etc., etc. The list goes on ... and on ... and on ...
Here is my post regarding the perks for Cruise. I guess my crime is self-evident:
<post that won't see the light of day on Marty's blog>
This is all covered by LRH policy:
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 NOVEMBER 1966
Admin Know-How Series 7
EXECUTIVE FACILITIES
FACILITY DIFFERENTIAL
"When a senior executive has the ability to make money for the organization or greatly raise statistics, and when this ability has been demonstrated, that executive should have facilities. This ability is often discoverable by the absence of the executive from post for a period or when the executive is pulled off by emergencies. In such a time the income of the org may sink. The degree the income shrinks is the "facility differential" of that executive. It is worth that much to the org in facilities to have the executive on post.
...
Facilities normally include
...
e. Those that buy leisure
...
g. Those that extend longevity on the job.
One can think of many things that do each of these."
Now certainly, Tom Cruise, as "the most dedicated Scientologist" and someone who "reaches billions with Scientology" is entitled to a bit of "facility differential" from you Sea Org schlubs. COB, even more so, no? Or as Tommy puts it, "Whatever small economic benefit Mr. Cruise may have received from the assistance of Church staff pales in comparison to the benefits the Church has received from Mr. Cruise’s many years of volunteer efforts for the Church.”
</post that won't see the light of day on Marty's blog>
Marty refused to post my somewhat tongue-in-cheek comment on the fact that perks for Cruise and COB align with LRH policy. That comment is posted below.
After deleting it two or three times, Marty did reply to my protest with "you are ncg."
"ncg" as most of us know here is "No Case Gain" and is somewhat of a shorthand for "Suppressive Person".
Marty and crew have no problem continuing the grand tradition of labelling and discarding anyone that will not toe the line. PTS, Type A - J, theety-weety, dilettante, middle-class, wog, db (degraded being), SP, ncg, out-ethics, nattery, etc., etc., etc. The list goes on ... and on ... and on ...
Here is my post regarding the perks for Cruise. I guess my crime is self-evident:
<post that won't see the light of day on Marty's blog>
This is all covered by LRH policy:
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 NOVEMBER 1966
Admin Know-How Series 7
EXECUTIVE FACILITIES
FACILITY DIFFERENTIAL
"When a senior executive has the ability to make money for the organization or greatly raise statistics, and when this ability has been demonstrated, that executive should have facilities. This ability is often discoverable by the absence of the executive from post for a period or when the executive is pulled off by emergencies. In such a time the income of the org may sink. The degree the income shrinks is the "facility differential" of that executive. It is worth that much to the org in facilities to have the executive on post.
...
Facilities normally include
...
e. Those that buy leisure
...
g. Those that extend longevity on the job.
One can think of many things that do each of these."
Now certainly, Tom Cruise, as "the most dedicated Scientologist" and someone who "reaches billions with Scientology" is entitled to a bit of "facility differential" from you Sea Org schlubs. COB, even more so, no? Or as Tommy puts it, "Whatever small economic benefit Mr. Cruise may have received from the assistance of Church staff pales in comparison to the benefits the Church has received from Mr. Cruise’s many years of volunteer efforts for the Church.”
</post that won't see the light of day on Marty's blog>
Last edited: